Overview

Title

An Act To amend the Coastal Barrier Resources Act to create an exemption for certain shoreline borrow sites.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to let some beach projects take sand from special areas if they have done it before in emergencies, between 2008 and 2023. It is now being looked at by a group in the Senate to see if it's a good idea.

Summary AI

H.R. 524 proposes an amendment to the Coastal Barrier Resources Act to allow certain federal coastal storm risk management projects to use sand from a restricted area for beach nourishment. This applies to projects or their predecessors that have used sand from these areas at least once between December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2023, due to emergency situations. The bill was passed by the House of Representatives on April 11, 2024, and is now under consideration by the Senate's Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Published

2024-04-15
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Referred in Senate
Date: 2024-04-15
Package ID: BILLS-118hr524rfs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
245
Pages:
2
Sentences:
9

Language

Nouns: 79
Verbs: 14
Adjectives: 8
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 28
Entities: 25

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.03
Average Sentence Length:
27.22
Token Entropy:
4.66
Readability (ARI):
14.60

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

House Bill 524 proposes an amendment to the Coastal Barrier Resources Act. The main purpose of this amendment is to create an exemption that allows certain Federal coastal storm risk management projects to use sand from protected coastal areas. This amendment applies only if these projects or their predecessors have used sand from these areas for beach nourishment in response to an emergency at least once between December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2023.

Summary of Significant Issues

One significant issue with the bill is the potential ambiguity in the language concerning which projects are eligible to use the sand resources. Specifically, it mentions "Federal coastal storm risk management projects or their predecessor projects," but does not clearly define these terms. This lack of clarity could lead to challenges in determining project eligibility.

Additionally, the specified timeframe—from December 31, 2008, to December 31, 2023—may limit the applicability of the amendment. This restriction could favor established projects that have already utilized these resources, potentially preventing new projects from taking advantage of the exemption.

The bill also references historical legislation, such as the "Flood Control Act of 1941," without providing sufficient context. This could lead to confusion among those unfamiliar with these prior laws, making it difficult to fully understand the implications.

Lastly, the amendment does not specify what constitutes "an emergency situation," leaving room for broad or inconsistent interpretation, which could impact how and when the exemption is applied.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, especially those living in coastal areas, this bill could mean enhanced protection against storm events. By allowing certain projects to access sand resources from protected areas, shorelines that are vulnerable to erosion and storm damage might receive necessary support more efficiently, potentially safeguarding homes and infrastructure.

However, the limitations imposed by the eligibility criteria and timeframe might mean that some vulnerable areas could miss out on these benefits if they do not qualify under the amendment's specific terms.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For federal agencies and contractors involved in coastal storm risk management, this amendment could provide a tangible benefit by facilitating access to sand resources necessary for beach nourishment, thus enhancing their ability to implement vital erosion control projects.

Local governments and communities situated near protected coastal areas might witness positive impacts if eligible projects in their regions are greenlighted due to this amendment. These projects could help mitigate storm risks, preserve local ecosystems, and support tourism-dependent economies.

Conversely, environmental advocacy groups might have concerns about the potential ecological impact of increasing access to protected coastal areas for sand extraction, worrying that it could disrupt habitats and wildlife.

Overall, while the bill aims to offer a practical solution to storm risk management, it presents several complexities and ambiguities that need resolution to ensure equitable and effective application.

Issues

  • The language regarding 'Federal coastal storm risk management projects or their predecessor projects' in Section 1 could lead to ambiguity and misinterpretation about which projects qualify to use the sand sources, potentially excluding deserving projects or including non-qualified ones.

  • The specification of the timeframe from December 31, 2008, to December 31, 2023, in Section 1 might limit the amendment's applicability, potentially favoring established projects over new ones that could also benefit from the resources.

  • The amendment's reference to historical legislation like the 'Flood Control Act of 1941' without detailed context may obscure understanding for stakeholders not familiar with these laws, leading to confusion about its application.

  • Section 1 lacks specificity in defining what constitutes 'an emergency situation,' possibly resulting in broad or inconsistent applications of the exception, affecting legal clarity and project eligibility.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Federal coastal storm risk management projects Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 6(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act has been updated to allow Federal coastal storm risk management projects to use sand from certain protected areas if they have done so at least once between December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2023, in response to an emergency.