Overview

Title

An Act To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide or assist in providing a vehicle adapted for operation by disabled individuals to certain eligible persons, to pay expenses associated with the delivery of such vehicle, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 522 is a bill that wants to help disabled veterans by giving them special cars they can drive and making sure the cars get to them without them having to pay for it. It also makes a small change about when a fee for a house loan needs to be paid.

Summary AI

H. R. 522, known as the "Deliver for Veterans Act," aims to amend current laws to assist certain disabled veterans. The bill allows the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to help provide vehicles adapted for operation by those with disabilities and covers the costs of delivering these vehicles to the veterans. Additionally, it makes a minor adjustment to the timetable for certain housing loan fees under the Department of Veterans Affairs. This legislation was passed by the House and is currently being considered by the Senate.

Published

2024-09-25
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Referred in Senate
Date: 2024-09-25
Package ID: BILLS-118hr522rfs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
279
Pages:
2
Sentences:
9

Language

Nouns: 87
Verbs: 27
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 16
Entities: 22

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.28
Average Sentence Length:
31.00
Token Entropy:
4.49
Readability (ARI):
17.74

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The "Deliver for Veterans Act" proposes amendments to title 38 of the United States Code, aiming to support certain eligible veterans by facilitating the delivery of adaptive vehicles. Specifically, it authorizes the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to not only cover the purchase of such vehicles but also the associated delivery costs. Additionally, the bill makes an adjustment to dates regarding loan fees related to veterans’ housing.

Summary of Significant Issues

Within the bill, several potential issues could arise due to the lack of specificity in its language:

  1. Undefined Shipping Costs: Section 2 of the bill does not set any limits or guidelines for the shipping costs of adaptive vehicles. Without these parameters, there is a risk that government funds could be used inefficiently if the shipping costs are excessively high.

  2. Criteria for 'Adaptive Vehicle': The bill does not provide a clear definition of what constitutes an 'adaptive vehicle.' This omission could result in inconsistencies when determining which vehicles qualify for the benefits outlined.

  3. Lack of Shipping Provider Constraints: The absence of competitive guidelines or restrictions on shipping providers raises concerns about favoritism. Without a structured process, there could be an ethical risk of choosing certain companies over others without fair competition.

  4. Unclear Date Change Rationale: In Section 3, the amendment updates loan fee validity dates with no contextual explanation. This lack of transparency could lead to questions regarding the necessity and implications of this change.

  5. Ambiguity in Short Title: Section 1 provides a short title without further elaboration on the act’s intent or provisions, making it difficult to grasp the full purpose and expected outcomes.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The bill potentially affects various stakeholders differently:

  • Veterans: If appropriately implemented, the bill could significantly benefit veterans needing adaptive vehicles by reducing the financial burden associated with purchasing and delivering these essential adaptations. However, without clear definitions and limits, the intended benefits could be undermined by administrative challenges.

  • Government Spending: From a fiscal perspective, the lack of shipping cost guidelines and constraints might lead to unnecessary spending. This could cause concern among taxpayers if funds are not utilized efficiently.

  • Shipping Providers: The bill, as currently written, may inadvertently benefit specific shipping companies if no competitive process is established. This could lead to an imbalance in the market and raise ethical concerns regarding fair business practices.

  • Financial Institutions and Homebuyers: While the change in dates for housing loan fees might seem procedural, it can affect planning for those utilizing these services. Without a clear reason for this shift, financial stakeholders might face uncertainty.

In conclusion, while the "Deliver for Veterans Act" seeks to provide much-needed assistance to disabled veterans, the effectiveness of its implementation could be hindered by the vague and unspecified details surrounding key logistical and financial aspects. Addressing these issues with clearer guidelines and definitions could enhance the bill's potential benefits and minimize risks.

Issues

  • Section 2 does not specify any limits or guidelines on the shipping prices for adaptive vehicles, which might lead to potential wasteful government spending if the shipping costs are unnecessarily high. Without defined constraints, there is a financial risk involved.

  • Section 2 lacks explicit criteria regarding what constitutes an 'adaptive vehicle.' The absence of a clear definition could lead to inconsistencies and disputes in determining eligibility for this benefit.

  • Section 2 does not address whether there are any constraints or requirements on the shipping provider, which could potentially favor certain companies over others. The lack of a competitive bidding process or guidelines could lead to ethical concerns regarding favoritism or lack of fair competition.

  • The amendment in Section 3 updates loan fee date specifics but does not provide a rationale for extending the date from 'November 15, 2031' to 'November 29, 2031'. This lack of transparency might raise political or procedural concerns regarding the necessity or impact of this change.

  • Section 1 merely provides a title for the act without offering insight into content, objectives, or provisions, making it challenging to evaluate the bill's overall intent and effectiveness. This lack of detail might lead to legal or political ambiguity about the act's application.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the act will be referred to as the “Deliver for Veterans Act.”

2. Eligibility for department of veterans affairs coverage of costs associated with delivery of an adaptive vehicle Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed amendment to Section 3902(a) of title 38 in the United States Code changes the way the Department of Veterans Affairs covers costs for veterans. Now, not only will they cover the purchase price of an adaptive vehicle, but they will also cover the shipping costs to deliver the vehicle to the veteran.

3. Modification of certain housing loan fees Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section modifies the loan fee table in section 3729(b)(2) of title 38 of the United States Code by changing the date from “November 15, 2031” to “November 29, 2031.”