Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rules for postponing certain deadlines by reason of disaster.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 517 is about changing the rules so that people have more time to file their taxes if there's a big storm or disaster, like a fire or flood. It lets the government give people an extra 120 days to finish their taxes when these things happen.
Summary AI
H.R. 517 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to change how deadlines can be postponed due to disasters. The bill allows the Secretary of the Treasury, with input from FEMA, to extend tax deadlines in response to disasters declared by states. It broadens the definition of disasters to include natural catastrophes and other events, such as fires and floods, that cause significant damage. Additionally, it extends the mandatory extension period for tax deadlines from 60 to 120 days following such disasters.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Its primary aim is to adjust the rules that allow for postponements of federal tax deadlines due to disasters. The bill provides the Secretary of the Treasury, in coordination with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the authority to delay tax deadlines when a state declares a disaster. Additionally, it proposes extending the existing 60-day mandatory extension period for taxpayer relief to 120 days. These changes will apply to any disaster declarations made after the bill's enactment.
Significant Issues
One key issue with this bill is the ambiguity surrounding the term "qualified State declared disaster." The bill allows for postponements based on a disaster's severity as determined by a state's Governor or, in the case of the District of Columbia, the Mayor. This could lead to inconsistent application across different states and territories, as it lacks specific criteria for determining what constitutes "sufficient severity and magnitude."
Another concern is the extensive discretion granted to the Secretary and state or local officials. This could lead to favoritism or unequal application of the rules, raising ethical and legal concerns about the potential for abuse of power. Additionally, the complex legal language used in the bill could hinder public understanding and compliance, particularly among those without legal expertise.
Impact on the Public
The bill has the potential to broadly benefit the public by allowing for more flexibility in tax filing during disaster situations. By extending the deadline for filing taxes to 120 days after a disaster declaration, individuals and businesses affected by unforeseen natural events may find it easier to comply with tax regulations during challenging times. However, the bill's lack of precise definitions and criteria might lead to confusion and uneven application, which could erode public trust and create disparities in who receives relief.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
State Governments and Officials: The bill empowers Governors and Mayors to initiate requests for postponements based on their assessments of disaster impact. While this allows for swift local responses, it also places the burden on state and local leaders to make potentially contentious determinations about disasters.
Taxpayers in Disaster-Affected Areas: For individuals and businesses affected by natural disasters, extended deadlines could provide much-needed relief and help them manage tax obligations during recovery periods. However, inconsistencies in declaring what qualifies as a disaster could lead to some affected areas receiving benefits while others do not, depending on the interpretation by state officials.
Federal Agencies: The Treasury Department and FEMA are involved in the consultation process for granting tax deadline extensions. This collaboration may improve coordination in disaster response but also requires these agencies to manage additional responsibilities, potentially affecting their resources and operations.
Overall, while the bill aims to provide crucial flexibility in disaster situations, the issues of discretion, clarity, and consistency need to be carefully addressed to ensure fair and equitable implementation.
Issues
The term 'qualified State declared disaster' in Section 2 could be ambiguous, leading to inconsistent application across states because it relies on the subjective determination of the Governor or Mayor. This lack of clear criteria for what constitutes sufficient severity and magnitude can create discrepancies and potential unfair treatment, raising legal and political concerns.
The delegation of authority to the Secretary and the Governor/Mayor in Section 2 to apply these disaster-related rules may lead to excessive discretion, which could result in favoritism or unequal treatment. This raises ethical and legal concerns about the potential for abuse of power.
The complexity and legal jargon in Section 2 could be overwhelming for individuals without a legal background, affecting public understanding or compliance. This issue is significant because it might impede informed participation by the public and affected parties in the legislative process.
The brief nature of Section 1, 'Short title', provides no substantive context or details about the 'Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act', potentially creating confusion about the bill's scope and intent. While it may not pose significant legal issues, it may impact public and stakeholder understanding of the legislation's objectives.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section specifies the name of the legislation, allowing it to be referred to as the “Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act.”
2. Modification of rules for postponing certain deadlines by reason of disaster Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill allows the Secretary of the Treasury, after consulting with FEMA, to delay federal tax deadlines in response to natural disasters declared by states. It also extends the mandatory deadline extension for such delays from 60 to 120 days, and these changes will apply to any disaster declarations made after the bill is enacted.