Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rules for postponing certain deadlines by reason of disaster.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 517 wants to let the people in charge of taxes give everyone more time to pay their taxes if bad things happen because of storms or other big problems in their area, even if the problem wasn't declared by the big government. It also gives them more days, from 60 to 120, to do this.
Summary AI
H.R. 517 is a bill aimed at amending the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to change how deadlines can be postponed due to disasters. The bill allows the Secretary of the Treasury to extend federal tax deadlines for disasters declared by states, not just those declared by the federal government. It defines what qualifies as a state-declared disaster and includes territories like Puerto Rico and Guam. Additionally, the mandatory extension for these deadlines would be increased from 60 to 120 days.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
House Bill 517, titled the "Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. This bill proposes modifications to the rules that allow for the postponement of federal tax deadlines in the event of a disaster. It expands the Secretary of the Treasury's authority to extend these deadlines when requested in writing by a state governor or the mayor of the District of Columbia. Furthermore, it extends the period for mandatory tax deadline extensions from the current 60 days to 120 days in case of qualifying disasters. Additionally, it clarifies that U.S. territories, such as Puerto Rico and Guam, are included in the definition of "State" for these purposes.
Significant Issues
One notable issue with the bill is the broad definition of what constitutes a "qualified State declared disaster." The criteria involve various natural catastrophes or severe incidents which are determined by a governor or a mayor as causing sufficient damage to necessitate tax deadline extensions. However, such broad definitions could lead to inconsistent applications across different states. This inconsistency might allow for varied interpretations and, potentially, misuse of the provision.
Additionally, the bill lacks specific accountability mechanisms to ensure that the determination of a disaster is made accurately and free from external pressure or bias. Another concern is that the process for a governor or mayor to submit a written request to extend tax deadlines lacks detail regarding the format, timing, or content of such requests, potentially resulting in inconsistencies.
The bill's proposal to extend mandatory deadline extensions from 60 to 120 days raises concerns due to the absence of analysis or justification for the chosen duration. While extrended relief can be beneficial in extended recovery times for certain disasters, it may be considered excessively long in other situations, potentially delaying federal tax revenue collections without necessity.
Moreover, the language of the bill references specific subsection numbers from the Internal Revenue Code, which might be confusing and less accessible to the general public unfamiliar with legal contexts.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, particularly in disaster-affected areas, this bill could provide crucial relief by allowing more time to file taxes amidst challenging circumstances. It reflects an understanding of the disruptions natural disasters can cause in individuals' lives and the complexities involved in recovery. However, broad federal oversight and clear guidelines should accompany such provisions to ensure equitable and justified application of these extensions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
State Governments and Residents: State governments, especially the governors and mayors, would have the significant responsibility of determining when a disaster qualifies for these allowed tax extensions. Residents in disaster-affected areas would experience direct benefits, as they would have extended time to address more immediate concerns before managing tax responsibilities.
Federal Government: The federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, must be prepared to handle increased administrative duties and manage potential revenue delay resulting from 120-day extensions. These extensions could complicate financial planning, emphasizing the need for balanced oversight to avoid excessive or unneeded extension requests.
Tax Preparers and Legal Professionals: This bill would impact tax preparers and legal professionals, as they would need to navigate the new extended deadlines and ensure that clients are informed about and in compliance with any applicable postponements.
In conclusion, while the "Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act" seeks to ease the burden of meeting tax deadlines following significant disasters, ensuring consistent application and accountability is crucial. The bill requires careful consideration and potential revisions to address concerns about broad definitions, lack of explicit processes, and clarity in communication to the public.
Issues
The broad definition of 'qualified State declared disaster' in Section 2 could lead to varied interpretations by governors or mayors, resulting in inconsistent application across states. This inconsistency might allow for misuse of the designation, leading to unjustified tax deadline extensions and potentially impacting federal tax revenue.
Section 2 lacks clear accountability mechanisms for ensuring the accuracy of a 'qualified State declared disaster' determination by a Governor or Mayor. This absence could allow external pressures or biases to influence decisions, leading to potential misuse or overuse of the provision.
The process for a Governor or Mayor to make a 'written request' to the Secretary, as described in Section 2, lacks detail regarding format, timing, or content, potentially resulting in inconsistent requests and administrative inefficiencies.
The extension of mandatory tax deadline extensions from 60 to 120 days in Section 2 does not provide analysis or justification for the increased duration. This extension could be seen as overly generous in certain situations, leading to delays in tax revenue collection without clear evidence of necessity.
The bill's language referencing subsection numbers from the Internal Revenue Code, particularly in Section 2, might be confusing to those not familiar with the legal context, making it less accessible to the general public and potentially hindering public understanding of the changes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section specifies the name of the legislation, allowing it to be referred to as the “Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act.”
2. Modification of rules for postponing certain deadlines by reason of disaster Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, changes are made to allow the Secretary of the Treasury to extend federal tax deadlines for up to 120 days if there's a disaster declared by a state governor. This applies to various natural catastrophes or other severe incidents that cause significant damage, and it now explicitly includes U.S. territories like Puerto Rico and Guam as states for this purpose.