Overview

Title

An Act To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rules for postponing certain deadlines by reason of disaster.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 517 is a plan to let people have more time to file their taxes if there's a big storm or disaster, like a hurricane. This means they can wait a little longer, up to four months, to do their taxes if something bad happens where they live.

Summary AI

H. R. 517, also known as the "Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to adjust the rules for postponing certain tax deadlines due to disasters. The bill allows the Secretary of the Treasury, after consulting with FEMA, to extend these deadlines to cover State-declared disasters, which can include natural events like hurricanes or earthquakes, as well as fires and floods. The bill also increases the mandatory deadline extensions from 60 days to 120 days for such situations. These changes will apply to declarations made after the bill becomes law.

Published

2025-04-01
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Referred in Senate
Date: 2025-04-01
Package ID: BILLS-119hr517rfs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
612
Pages:
4
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 173
Verbs: 41
Adjectives: 21
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 23
Entities: 48

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.89
Average Sentence Length:
61.20
Token Entropy:
4.64
Readability (ARI):
30.65

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act is a legislative proposal aimed at modifying the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Specifically, this bill focuses on altering the regulations surrounding the postponement of federal tax deadlines when natural disasters occur. It empowers the Secretary of the Treasury to extend these deadlines after consultation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), following a state's declaration of disaster. Additionally, it extends the mandatory deadline extension from 60 to 120 days, providing more time for affected taxpayers to file their taxes in the wake of such events. These modifications are set to apply to any disaster declarations made after the bill's enactment.

Summary of Significant Issues

Ambiguity and Discretion

One of the central issues with the bill is the ambiguity in defining what constitutes a "qualified State declared disaster." The decision rests heavily on the subjective judgment of state governors or district mayors, potentially leading to inconsistent applications across different states. The absence of specific criteria for what qualifies as "damage of sufficient severity and magnitude" could exacerbate this problem.

Financial Implications

The extension of the filing deadline to 120 days can have notable financial implications for federal tax revenue. While it provides relief to those impacted by natural disasters, it also means a potential delay in tax revenue collection, impacting federal cash flow.

Comprehension and Compliance

The complexity of the legal language and procedural requirements may overwhelm individuals or smaller entities without legal expertise. This could hinder their ability to utilize the relief provisions effectively, thereby affecting their financial recovery post-disaster.

Limited Scope

Moreover, the act is limited in scope, particularly due to the lack of detailed context or description in the "Short title" section. This may lead to confusion or misunderstanding about the overall purpose and application of the legislation.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broad Impact

For the broader public, this bill aims to provide crucial relief during unprecedented times by offering additional time to manage tax filings during disasters. This added flexibility could significantly aid individuals and businesses in focusing on immediate recovery efforts, without the added stress of impending tax deadlines.

Specific Stakeholders

State Governors and Mayors: These officials gain considerable decision-making power regarding disaster declarations and their subsequent federal tax implications. While this could ensure swift responses tailored to local conditions, it might also introduce bias or unequal treatment across regions.

Taxpayers in Affected Areas: For those directly impacted by natural disasters, the extended deadline is undeniably a positive benefit, granting more time to meet financial obligations without penalties.

Federal Government: On a federal level, the increased extension period could challenge cash flow management and budget planning. However, it also reflects a humanitarian approach, acknowledging the realities and disruptions caused by natural calamities.

In conclusion, while the Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act holds promise for providing essential relief, it raises pertinent questions about fairness, consistency, and the potential financial impact on both state and federal levels. As always, careful consideration and thoughtful implementation will be key to ensuring the legislation benefits those who need it most.

Issues

  • The broad discretion granted to the Secretary and the Governor/Mayor in determining what qualifies as a 'qualified State declared disaster' (Section 2) could lead to inconsistencies and potential favoritism, as it relies heavily on their subjective judgment without clear criteria or thresholds for severity and magnitude.

  • The amendment of Section 7508A to extend mandatory extensions to 120 days (Section 2) could have significant financial implications for federal tax revenue collection and cash flow, as it allows for a longer period before taxes must be filed during natural disasters.

  • The definition of 'qualified State declared disaster' (Section 2) is ambiguous, as it does not provide specific guidelines or thresholds for what constitutes 'damage of sufficient severity and magnitude,' which might lead to unequal application across different states or territories.

  • The legal complexity and lack of clear criteria in Section 2 might render it difficult for the general public or smaller entities to comprehend and comply with the procedures for postponing deadlines, potentially affecting their ability to benefit from the relief provided by the act.

  • The act is limited in scope and does not provide additional context in the 'Short title' section (Section 1), which could cause confusion or a lack of understanding about the overall purpose and application of the 'Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act.'

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section specifies the name of the legislation, allowing it to be referred to as the “Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act.”

2. Modification of rules for postponing certain deadlines by reason of disaster Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill allows the Secretary of the Treasury, after consulting with FEMA, to delay federal tax deadlines in response to natural disasters declared by states. It also extends the mandatory deadline extension for such delays from 60 to 120 days, and these changes will apply to any disaster declarations made after the bill is enacted.