Overview

Title

To establish a fund to promote the inspection and consumption of shrimp and products containing shrimp or shrimp parts.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 512 is a plan to use money from taxes on shrimp from other countries to make sure the shrimp is safe to eat and to help more people in America want to eat shrimp. Half of this money will check the shrimp for yucky things, and the other half will help tell people about how tasty shrimp is!

Summary AI

H.R. 512 seeks to create a fund in the U.S. Treasury called the "Inspection and Consumption of Shrimp and Shrimp Products Fund." This fund will consist of 70% of specific duties collected on imported shrimp products and will be used to support two main activities. First, half of the fund's money will support the inspection and testing of shrimp for contamination and ensure that imported shrimp does not come from illegal or unethical sources. Second, the remaining half will promote the domestic consumption of shrimp. The fund's resources will be available until fully spent and are intended to enhance, not replace, existing federal funding for shrimp purchases.

Published

2025-01-16
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-16
Package ID: BILLS-119hr512ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
814
Pages:
5
Sentences:
15

Language

Nouns: 257
Verbs: 65
Adjectives: 41
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 30
Entities: 65

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.46
Average Sentence Length:
54.27
Token Entropy:
4.91
Readability (ARI):
30.46

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled the “Imported Seafood Safety Standards Act” seeks to create a special fund called the "Inspection and Consumption of Shrimp and Shrimp Products Fund." This fund would be financed by using 70% of the duties collected on imported shrimp and products containing shrimp. The bill proposes two main uses for these funds: half would be allocated to the Department of Health and Human Services to ensure that shrimp imports are inspected for safety and legal compliance, while the remaining half would go to the Department of Agriculture to encourage the consumption of shrimp within the United States.

Summary of Significant Issues

One major issue with the bill is the lack of a financial cap on the amount of money that can be transferred yearly to the new fund from shrimp import duties. This could potentially lead to a significant diversion of federal financial resources, raising concerns about financial prioritization. There is also an ethical question about whether it is appropriate to allocate such a high percentage of duties to this specific purpose when there could be other pressing funding needs.

Another concern is the proposed allocation of 50% of the fund towards promoting domestic shrimp consumption. The bill lacks clarity on how this portion will be used effectively without unfairly distorting the market or influencing consumer behavior.

Moreover, the bill's establishment of a multi-agency framework for shrimp inspection and import regulation introduces potential bureaucratic inefficiencies. If not managed properly, this could lead to overlaps with existing programs and result in redundant spending of federal funds.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

From a public perspective, the bill aims to protect consumers by ensuring that imported shrimp are safe and legally sourced. If implemented correctly, it could improve seafood safety standards, benefiting everyone who consumes shrimp.

However, the economic implications might be mixed. If the fund's strategy to boost domestic shrimp consumption leads to market distortions, this could raise concerns about fairness and competition within the seafood market.

For shrimp importers and foreign suppliers, the bill could introduce more stringent inspection protocols, possibly raising their costs and operational complexities. Conversely, domestic shrimp producers may benefit from initiatives to promote shrimp consumption, potentially boosting their sales and market share.

The lack of built-in evaluation mechanisms means the fund's long-term effectiveness is uncertain, which might affect its capability to continue achieving its objectives. Stakeholders, including government agencies, might face challenges in navigating a new bureaucratic framework that could overlap existing seafood inspection programs if not adequately streamlined.

Issues

  • The bill establishes a fund using 70% of duties collected on shrimp imports without specifying a cap or yearly limit (Section 2). This lack of limitation could potentially divert significant financial resources, raising concerns about proper allocation and potential misappropriation of federal funds.

  • The bill allows for shrimp import duties to be prioritized for the fund over other possible uses for this revenue (Section 2). This may cause concerns regarding fiscal prioritization and the appropriateness of allocating such a high percentage to this specific fund, especially if other areas require funding.

  • The allocation of 50% of the Fund towards encouraging domestic consumption of shrimp (Section 2(c)(2)) may require further clarification on how funds will be used effectively without causing market distortions or unfairly influencing the market, thus potentially raising ethical questions.

  • The establishment of a complex, multi-agency framework for coordination (Section 2(c)(1)(C)) may introduce bureaucratic inefficiencies if not adequately streamlined or regulated, potentially leading to overlaps or redundancies in existing seafood inspection programs.

  • While the bill specifies that funds will remain available until expended (Section 2(d)), it lacks provisions for evaluating the fund's effectiveness and necessity over time, which could lead to long-term inefficiency if the fund does not achieve its objectives.

  • The designation of duties towards the Fund without aligning with existing programs (Section 2(c)(1)) could result in redundant spending and inefficiency if the new allocations overlap with current inspection and regulatory frameworks.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act specifies that its short title is the “Imported Seafood Safety Standards Act.”

2. Inspection and Consumption of Shrimp and Shrimp Products Fund Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

A fund called the "Inspection and Consumption of Shrimp and Shrimp Products Fund" is set up to use money from import duties on shrimp for two main purposes: half of the funds will go to the Department of Health and Human Services for inspecting shrimp imports to ensure they are safe and legally sourced, while the other half will go to the Department of Agriculture to promote the consumption of shrimp in the United States.