Overview
Title
To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to approve or deny spend plans within a certain amount of time, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The FISHES Act is a rule that aims to make sure help money for fishermen who have faced a big problem gets approved faster. It says once they know there's a problem, the people in charge have a set number of days to say, "Yes, we can give you the money now."
Summary AI
H.R. 5103, also known as the "Fishery Improvement to Streamline untimely regulatory Hurdles post Emergency Situation Act" or the "FISHES Act," aims to expedite the review and approval of spending plans related to fishery resource disasters. The bill mandates that after an affirmative determination of a fishery disaster, a spend plan must be submitted within 120 days. It requires the Secretary of the Office of Management and Budget to review the plan and ensure that funds are made available within 90 days of receiving a complete plan. This legislation seeks to address inefficiencies in the allocation of disaster relief funds to affected fisheries.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled the "Fishery Improvement to Streamline untimely regulatory Hurdles post Emergency Situation Act" (FISHES Act), is designed to expedite the process for allocating funding assistance in response to fishery resource disasters. Under this legislation, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) must approve or deny spending plans within a set time frame. The objective is to ensure that financial aid reaches affected stakeholders in a timely manner and without unnecessary bureaucratic delays.
Summary of Significant Issues
A key issue with the bill lies in its lengthy and complex title, which might be difficult for the general public to understand or remember. The acronym "FISHES Act" does not clearly reflect the specific intentions of the legislation, potentially leading to public confusion.
Another significant concern is the stringent timeline imposed for the disbursement of funds. Once a requester's spend plan is deemed complete, funds must be made available within 90 days. However, this strict deadline might prove challenging if complications arise during the review process, potentially delaying financial assistance.
Furthermore, the bill does not clearly define what constitutes a "complete" spend plan, leaving room for varying interpretations and possible delays. The lack of detailed guidance on remedying "incomplete" plans also introduces the risk of further procedural hindrances.
The legislation allows the OMB Director to review complete spend plans, but it does not provide clear guidelines or constraints for this review process. This omission could create ambiguity about the roles and responsibilities of involved officers, leading to administrative inefficiencies.
Impact on the Public
If effectively implemented, the FISHES Act could positively impact communities dependent on fisheries by providing rapid financial aid following a declared fishery disaster. This support could help mitigate economic losses and aid in the recovery of affected areas, ensuring the livelihood of individuals and businesses reliant on these resources.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders directly involved in fisheries, such as fishermen and associated businesses, the bill promises timely access to crucial funding. This could facilitate quicker recovery and help prevent long-term economic setbacks. The swift processing of aid could also serve as a confidence-building measure, reassuring these stakeholders of government support in times of crisis.
However, any lack of clarity or delays in the funding process might negatively affect these stakeholders, leaving them vulnerable during the interim. A complex or ambiguous approval process could also increase administrative burdens, impacting the efficiency of aid distribution.
Overall, while the bill has the potential to provide significant benefits, its success largely depends on the clarity of implementation guidelines and the ability to navigate potential procedural hurdles.
Issues
The long and complex title of the Act ('Fishery Improvement to Streamline untimely regulatory Hurdles post Emergency Situation Act') might make it difficult for the public to understand the purpose of the legislation. The acronym 'FISHES Act' may also lead to confusion about its intent. (Section 1)
The deadline of providing funds within 90 days after receiving a complete spend plan is strict and could be challenging to meet, especially if issues arise during the review process. The legislation does not address potential delays in funding if additional deliberation is required. (Section 2)
The section on spend plans does not specify any criteria for what constitutes a 'complete' spend plan, potentially leading to differing interpretations and delays in processing. (Section 2)
The process for handling an 'incomplete spend plan' only includes providing a description of missing information, which might not be sufficient guidance for resubmission, causing further delays. (Section 2)
The text allows for the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to review completed spend plans but lacks clear guidelines or constraints for this review, introducing ambiguity around the roles of different officers and possibly leading to inefficiencies. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section specifies the short title of the Act, which can be called the "Fishery Improvement to Streamline untimely regulatory Hurdles post Emergency Situation Act" or "FISHES Act."
2. Spend plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 2 of the proposed amendments to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act requires requesters of fishery disaster funds to submit detailed spend plans within 120 days, outlining objectives, work statements, and budgets, for review by the Secretary. It mandates funds be granted within 90 days of receiving a complete plan, with an option for budget oversight, ensuring swift access to financial support without delays from budget reviews.