Overview
Title
To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 by requiring preclearance quarantine inspections for all movement to or from the State of Hawaii by either domestic or international travel, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 487 is a plan to help keep Hawaii safe from bugs and plants that don't belong there by checking bags and packages when people travel to and from Hawaii. It also talks about charging a little money to pay for these checks.
Summary AI
H.R. 487, known as the "Hawaii Invasive Species Protection Act," proposes changes to the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002. This bill requires preclearance quarantine inspections for all travel to and from Hawaii, both domestic and international, to prevent the spread of high-risk invasive species and agricultural materials. These inspections will involve various government departments and agencies and will take place at airports, ports, and postal service facilities. The bill also allows for the collection of user fees to cover the cost of these inspections.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Hawaii Invasive Species Protection Act," seeks to amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002. The primary aim of this bill is to mandate preclearance quarantine inspections for all transit to and from the State of Hawaii, whether by domestic or international travel. These inspections, which include visual, x-ray, and canine checks, are intended to prevent the spread of invasive species and harmful agricultural materials. The bill outlines that these inspections would occur at airports, ports, and specific postal facilities. Additionally, it stipulates that high-risk items identified during inspections can be seized and disposed of in a manner consistent with existing legal frameworks.
Summary of Significant Issues
A major issue with the proposed legislation is its requirement for extensive coordination between various federal and state agencies, including the Departments of Agriculture, Interior, Homeland Security, and others. This collaboration could potentially lead to bureaucratic inefficiencies and jurisdictional disputes that might compromise the effectiveness of inspections. Another significant concern is the lack of detailed funding strategies to support these activities, which might strain budgets and hinder implementation.
Furthermore, the bill's language regarding the identification and management of "high-risk invasive species and agricultural materials" is complex and redundant, which may create opportunities for legal challenges or inconsistent enforcement. Financial implications are another area of concern; for instance, the introduction of inspection fees might disproportionately affect small businesses and specific individuals involved in the transport of plants or other materials.
Impact on the Public Broadly
If implemented effectively, the bill could positively impact public welfare by protecting Hawaii’s unique ecosystems from invasive species that can cause extensive ecological and economic harm. Such protection might preserve biodiversity and prevent the encroachment of species that threaten Hawaii's agricultural productivity and natural resources. However, the potential delays and inefficiencies resulting from bureaucratic coordination could stress logistical operations and lead to increased wait times or costs for travelers and businesses.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders such as agricultural businesses, and those involved in import and export activities, this bill could represent a double-edged sword. On one hand, it could protect local agricultural economies by safeguarding them against potentially devastating invasive species. On the other hand, the additional inspections and associated fees could impose operational burdens, particularly on smaller enterprises with fewer resources to absorb these costs. Travelers may experience delays and increased scrutiny during their transit to and from Hawaii, which could affect tourism and business travel negatively.
In conclusion, while the Hawaii Invasive Species Protection Act has the potential to offer significant environmental benefits, particularly for Hawaii, it faces critical challenges in execution and clarity that need addressing to ensure it does not unfairly burden certain sectors or lead to complex bureaucratic issues.
Issues
The bill requires large-scale coordination among federal and state agencies for preclearance inspections as mandated in Sections 2 and 10811, which could lead to bureaucratic inefficiencies and jurisdictional disputes. This could result in delayed or ineffective inspections, impacting agricultural trade and invasive species control in Hawaii.
Sections 2 and 10811 of the bill lack clarity and specificity on the funding and resource allocation for the preclearance quarantine inspections, potentially causing budgetary strain or inadequate implementation of the inspection process.
The language in Sections 2 and 3 concerning 'high-risk invasive species and agricultural materials' is repeated and could be simplified, reducing redundancy and improving clarity. The definitions and criteria for these terms are vague, which could lead to legal challenges or inconsistencies in enforcement.
Section 4, which deals with the collection of fees for inspection services, raises concerns about financial impact, particularly for businesses engaged in import/export to Hawaii. The lack of clarity on how costs will be covered may result in increased fees for stakeholders without proper justification.
Section 5 prescribes user fees to cover the cost of inspections, but there is no clear guideline on what constitutes 'full cost,' potentially imposing financial burdens on small businesses or specific individuals involved in plant exporting or transiting.
The publication timeline in Section 10811(d) requires the Secretary of Agriculture to publish a list in the Federal Register within 180 days. This may not be realistic given the complexity of cooperation required, potentially leading to inspection delays and operational challenges.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act provides its name, stating that it can be called the “Hawaii Invasive Species Protection Act.”
2. Requiring preclearance quarantine inspections for all movement to or from the State of Hawaii Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a requirement for preclearance quarantine inspections on all movements to and from Hawaii to prevent the spread of invasive species and harmful agricultural materials. These inspections, including visual, x-ray, and canine checks, will be performed at various locations like airports and ports, and there will be a published list of items subject to inspection; any high-risk items found may be seized and disposed of.
10811. Preclearance quarantine inspections Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that quarantine inspections for invasive species and agricultural materials be conducted before travel to or from Hawaii. These inspections, which can include visual, x-ray, and canine methods, will be carried out by several government agencies at specified locations such as airports and postal facilities, and any high-risk items found can be seized and disposed of according to the law.
3. Preclearance quarantine inspections for plants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 421(b) of the Plant Protection Act involves adding language to ensure that inspections of plants before entering the United States pay special attention to high-risk invasive species and agricultural materials, particularly those entering Hawaii, aligning with specific guidelines from the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002.
4. Collection of fees for inspection services Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends a law to include the costs of inspection services for invasive species when arriving in Hawaii, ensuring that screenings are covered for import, entry, and export related to high-risk species according to the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act.
5. Fees for inspection of plants for exporting or transiting Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944, requiring the Secretary of Agriculture to set and collect fees that cover the full cost of inspecting plants for export or transit to comply with the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002.