Overview

Title

An Act To direct the Consumer Product Safety Commission to establish a pilot program to explore the use of artificial intelligence in support of the mission of the Commission and to direct the Secretary of Commerce and the Federal Trade Commission to study and report on the use of blockchain technology and tokens, respectively.

ELI5 AI

The Consumer Safety Technology Act wants to use new technology to keep people safe by checking if products are safe and stopping fake things on the internet. It asks some important people to test using smart computers and special internet tools to see if they can help keep us safe from bad products and scams.

Summary AI

H. R. 4814, known as the "Consumer Safety Technology Act," aims to explore and study new technologies to enhance consumer protection. The bill directs the Consumer Product Safety Commission to pilot the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for improving product safety by identifying hazards and monitoring recalled products. Additionally, it mandates the Secretary of Commerce and the Federal Trade Commission to study the use of blockchain technology and digital tokens in preventing consumer fraud. The results of these initiatives will be reported to Congress with findings and recommendations.

Published

2024-05-15
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Referred in Senate
Date: 2024-05-15
Package ID: BILLS-118hr4814rfs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
9
Words:
1,674
Pages:
10
Sentences:
50

Language

Nouns: 543
Verbs: 126
Adjectives: 102
Adverbs: 13
Numbers: 67
Entities: 117

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.44
Average Sentence Length:
33.48
Token Entropy:
4.93
Readability (ARI):
19.72

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The Consumer Safety Technology Act, known as H.R. 4814, proposes a legislative measure introduced to harness technology to improve consumer safety. It directs several U.S. agencies to engage with new technological tools like artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain. The bill outlines three main initiatives:

  1. Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Product Safety: The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) must initiate a pilot program to explore the integration of AI into its consumer safety mission.

  2. Blockchain Technology Innovation: The Secretary of Commerce is tasked with studying blockchain technology to determine its potential benefits in consumer protection, particularly against fraud.

  3. Token Taxonomy: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will report on issues related to transactions involving digital tokens, aiming to identify and curb unfair or deceptive practices.

Summary of Significant Issues

Lack of Financial Details: A prominent concern is the absence of budget specifications for both the AI pilot program and the blockchain study. Without clear financial guidelines, there is a risk of unchecked spending which might lead to inefficiencies or resource misallocation.

Ambiguity in Definitions: Terms like "tokens" are insufficiently defined across the bill's relevant sections, creating potential ambiguity. Such lack of clarity might result in confusion as these terms can encompass a wide range of digital assets.

Timeline and Criteria Concerns: There are concerns about the adequacy of the timelines set for comprehensive studies and reports, such as the one-year timeline for the FTC's report on digital tokens. Additionally, the criteria for evaluating the success of AI implementations lack specificity, which could hinder objective assessment.

Complex Language: Some sections, particularly those outlining requirements for the blockchain study, use complex language. Simplifying these sections could improve understanding and allow more stakeholders to engage meaningfully with the legislation.

Impact on the Public Broadly

The proposed Act has the potential to significantly influence everyday consumers by enhancing the regulatory framework ensuring product safety. With AI aiding in rapid hazard identification and blockchain technology providing more robust fraud prevention mechanisms, consumers could experience a higher level of protection. However, the effectiveness of these measures depends heavily on the thoroughness and transparency of execution, which, as noted, faces certain challenges due to unclear budgeting and timelines.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Government Agencies: Agencies like the CPSC, FTC, and the Department of Commerce will bear the responsibility of executing these programs. This could necessitate additional training and resource allocation, as they adapt to newfound technological paradigms.

Technology and Retail Sectors: Tech companies, especially those specializing in AI and blockchain, may find new opportunities to partner with the government on these initiatives. Meanwhile, retail businesses might see changes in compliance requirements, especially concerning the monitoring and sale of consumer products.

Consumers: Consumers stand to benefit from the enhancements in security and protection against hazardous products and fraudulent activities. However, clear communication around these initiatives will be essential to build trust in the new technologies being used.

Legal and Regulatory Professionals: Professionals in this sector might find new opportunities to shape the implementation of these technologies in a regulatory context. This could involve developing standards and practices to ensure these tools are used ethically and effectively.

In conclusion, while the Consumer Safety Technology Act opens up avenues for technological advancement in consumer safety, it comes with myriad challenges concerning financial clarity and precise execution. The outcomes will largely depend on how well these challenges are addressed in practice.

Issues

  • The bill does not specify a budget or cost estimate for the pilot program for using artificial intelligence by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (Section 102). This lack of financial details might lead to unregulated spending, making it crucial for budget oversight and accountability.

  • The term 'tokens' is not clearly defined across relevant sections (Sections 302 and 303), which could lead to confusion and ambiguity regarding digital assets, impacting legal clarity and enforcement.

  • There are no specific guidelines for monitoring AI technologies for accuracy and bias in the pilot program by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (Section 102), which are crucial for ensuring the reliability and fairness of AI applications.

  • The bill mandates a study on blockchain technology for consumer protection without providing a specific budget or cost, leading to potential concerns about wasteful spending (Section 202).

  • The timeline for the Federal Trade Commission to conduct a thorough report on unfair or deceptive acts or practices in transactions relating to tokens is set at 1 year (Section 303), which may not be sufficient for a comprehensive analysis.

  • The lack of specificity on the consequences or follow-up actions if unfair or deceptive acts are identified in the token transactions report (Section 303) poses potential gaps in enforcing consumer protection.

  • The language used in some sections, such as those detailing the blockchain study requirements, is complex and might benefit from simplification to improve understanding and clarity (Section 202).

  • The bill's lack of indication of how the findings regarding tokens will be acted upon, potentially causing confusion about the purpose and impact of the report on unfair or deceptive acts or practices (Section 1).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Consumer Safety Technology Act introduces various titles aimed at enhancing consumer safety through technology. It includes initiatives like using artificial intelligence in product safety, studying blockchain for consumer protection, and investigating unfair practices related to digital tokens.

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines key terms used in the Act: “consumer product” as per the Consumer Product Safety Act, “Secretary” as the Secretary of Commerce, and “token” as a digital representation of information on a blockchain or similar technology.

101. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides the short title of the legislation, which is called the “AI for Consumer Product Safety Act.”

102. Pilot program for use of artificial intelligence by Consumer Product Safety Commission Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Consumer Product Safety Commission is required to start a pilot program within a year to test how artificial intelligence can support its mission to ensure product safety. The program will explore using AI for tasks like tracking injuries, identifying hazards, and monitoring recalled products, with input from experts and industry stakeholders. A report on the program's findings must be submitted to Congress and made publicly accessible.

201. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill states that the official name for this title is the "Blockchain Innovation Act".

202. Study on blockchain technology and its use in consumer protection Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section mandates the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study within one year on how blockchain technology can be used for consumer protection, such as reducing fraud. The study will include exploring the current and potential uses of blockchain, its benefits and risks, and possible regulatory changes, with opportunities for public input. A report with the findings will be submitted to Congress and made publicly available.

301. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the title of this part of the legislative bill is the "Digital Taxonomy Act."

302. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress emphasizes the importance of the United States leading in innovation and notes the growing significance of tokens and blockchain technology. It highlights the role of the Federal Trade Commission in protecting consumers from deceptive practices involving these technologies and suggests enhancing training and resources for staff to effectively enforce regulations.

303. Report on unfair or deceptive acts or practices in transactions relating to tokens Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is required to create a report, available to the public, detailing actions and efforts to address unfair or deceptive practices involving tokens and suggesting potential legislation to better protect consumers in this market. This report is to be submitted to both the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation within one year of the Act's enactment.