Overview

Title

An Act To direct the Consumer Product Safety Commission to establish a pilot program to explore the use of artificial intelligence in support of the mission of the Commission and to direct the Secretary of Commerce and the Federal Trade Commission to study and report on the use of blockchain technology and tokens, respectively.

ELI5 AI

In this bill, they want to try using smart computers and special tech to keep people safe from bad products, and they are also studying how new internet money ideas might help.

Summary AI

H.R. 4814, also known as the “Consumer Safety Technology Act,” seeks to enhance consumer protection using new technology. It directs the Consumer Product Safety Commission to initiate a pilot program that explores the use of artificial intelligence in its safety efforts. The bill also instructs the Secretary of Commerce to study how blockchain technology could be used to protect consumers and asks the Federal Trade Commission to report on transactions involving tokens. The findings and recommendations from these studies and programs will be reported to Congress to help improve consumer safety and address related challenges.

Published

2024-05-14
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed in House
Date: 2024-05-14
Package ID: BILLS-118hr4814eh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
9
Words:
1,731
Pages:
12
Sentences:
55

Language

Nouns: 565
Verbs: 126
Adjectives: 103
Adverbs: 15
Numbers: 69
Entities: 117

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.42
Average Sentence Length:
31.47
Token Entropy:
4.92
Readability (ARI):
18.56

AnalysisAI

The Consumer Safety Technology Act is a legislative proposal aiming to integrate modern technologies into the realm of consumer protection in the United States. It outlines initiatives across three distinct areas: the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) for consumer product safety, the use of blockchain technology for enhancing consumer protection, and the regulation of digital tokens in commerce.

General Summary of the Bill

This proposed legislation comprises three primary components. First, it authorizes the Consumer Product Safety Commission to embark on a pilot program exploring AI applications to better track product-related injuries, identify potential hazards, and monitor the market for recalled products. Second, it mandates a study on the potential applications of blockchain technology for consumer protection, particularly in combating fraud. Lastly, the bill requires the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to report on deceptive practices in the digital token marketplace and consider legislative measures that enhance consumer protection in this rapidly evolving sector.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues arise with the proposed legislation. The AI pilot program lacks a clear budget, raising concerns about unregulated spending. Furthermore, the program does not specify success metrics or guidelines on monitoring AI for biases, which is critical from a legal and ethical standpoint. Likewise, the blockchain technology study could lead to financial concerns due to the absence of a detailed cost outline. The complex language and undefined terms, such as "token," create ambiguities that could lead to legal misunderstandings. Additionally, the timeline for the FTC's comprehensive report on token transactions seems tight, potentially affecting the depth and quality of the findings.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this bill could have profound implications. The successful incorporation of AI into consumer safety could enhance the efficacy of monitoring and mitigating product-related hazards, leading to improved public health and safety. The study into blockchain technology could also elevate consumer protection by potentially reducing fraud, an ongoing issue in digital transactions.

However, concerns about financial oversight and lack of clarity in certain provisions might lead to inefficient implementation of these initiatives. The public may express apprehension regarding government transparency and accountability due to undefined budget specifics and stakeholder engagement guidelines.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, such as technologists and data scientists, might view this legislation as a promising opportunity to apply their expertise in a practical, impactful manner, particularly through the AI pilot program. However, they might also be concerned about the lack of detailed outcomes and success metrics, which could hinder clear assessments of the program's effectiveness.

In the blockchain and digital token space, this bill could lead to increased scrutiny from the FTC, possibly resulting in more stringent regulations. Companies operating in this sector might need to adapt quickly to new regulatory environments, impacting their operations. On the other hand, consumers could benefit from enhanced protections against unfair or deceptive practices in digital transactions.

In conclusion, the Consumer Safety Technology Act presents potential benefits through technological integration in consumer protection, but it also raises significant issues concerning financial oversight and clarity. Its impact will depend heavily on the implementation details and how they address the concerns of both consumers and industry stakeholders.

Issues

  • The pilot program for artificial intelligence use by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (Section 102) lacks a specified budget or cost estimate, which could lead to unregulated spending and financial concerns for the public.

  • The lack of specific metrics, criteria for evaluating success, and guidelines on monitoring accuracy and bias in the AI pilot program (Section 102) raises legal and ethical issues regarding the reliability and fairness of AI applications.

  • The study on blockchain technology in consumer protection (Section 202) could involve significant spending without a specific budget or cost outline, raising concerns about potential wasteful spending and lack of financial oversight.

  • The use of complex language and lack of clearly defined terms, such as 'token' and 'public-private partnerships' (Sections 202 and 302), contributes to ambiguity and possible legal misunderstandings.

  • The one-year timeline for the Federal Trade Commission to compile a comprehensive report on unfair or deceptive acts related to tokens (Section 303) may not be sufficient, potentially undermining the quality and thoroughness of the investigation.

  • Potential modifications to Federal regulations without specifics (Section 202) may cause public concern about the scope and impact of regulatory changes, particularly if they affect consumer protection laws.

  • The absence of detailed guidelines for engaging diverse stakeholders in the AI pilot program (Section 102) raises issues of transparency and inclusivity in governmental decision-making processes.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Consumer Safety Technology Act includes various sections aimed at incorporating technology into consumer protection. It consists of three main titles: the first addresses the use of artificial intelligence for safety by the Consumer Product Safety Commission; the second explores blockchain technology's role in consumer protection; and the third discusses token-related transactions and their regulations.

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines key terms used in the Act: “consumer product” as per the Consumer Product Safety Act, “Secretary” as the Secretary of Commerce, and “token” as a digital representation of information on a blockchain or similar technology.

101. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides the short title of the legislation, which is called the “AI for Consumer Product Safety Act.”

102. Pilot program for use of artificial intelligence by Consumer Product Safety Commission Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Consumer Product Safety Commission is required to start a pilot program within a year to test how artificial intelligence can support its mission to ensure product safety. The program will explore using AI for tasks like tracking injuries, identifying hazards, and monitoring recalled products, with input from experts and industry stakeholders. A report on the program's findings must be submitted to Congress and made publicly accessible.

201. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill states that the official name for this title is the "Blockchain Innovation Act".

202. Study on blockchain technology and its use in consumer protection Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section mandates the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study within one year on how blockchain technology can be used for consumer protection, such as reducing fraud. The study will include exploring the current and potential uses of blockchain, its benefits and risks, and possible regulatory changes, with opportunities for public input. A report with the findings will be submitted to Congress and made publicly available.

301. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the title of this part of the legislative bill is the "Digital Taxonomy Act."

302. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress emphasizes the importance of the United States leading in innovation and notes the growing significance of tokens and blockchain technology. It highlights the role of the Federal Trade Commission in protecting consumers from deceptive practices involving these technologies and suggests enhancing training and resources for staff to effectively enforce regulations.

303. Report on unfair or deceptive acts or practices in transactions relating to tokens Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is required to create a report, available to the public, detailing actions and efforts to address unfair or deceptive practices involving tokens and suggesting potential legislation to better protect consumers in this market. This report is to be submitted to both the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation within one year of the Act's enactment.