Overview

Title

An Act To provide for the imposition of sanctions with respect to illicit captagon trafficking.

ELI5 AI

The "Illicit Captagon Trafficking Suppression Act" is a plan to stop people in other countries from making and selling a bad drug called captagon, mostly coming from Syria, by punishing those involved, like blocking their stuff and not letting them visit the U.S. It also makes sure there are special rules to help people if they really need it.

Summary AI

H. R. 4681, known as the “Illicit Captagon Trafficking Suppression Act of 2023,” directs the U.S. government to impose sanctions on foreign individuals and groups involved in the illegal production and distribution of captagon, a dangerous stimulant commonly made in Syria. It holds accountable those connected to the Syrian regime and Hizballah who participate in producing and spreading captagon internationally. The bill outlines specific penalties, including blocking property and denying visas for violators, while also allowing for waivers under specific humanitarian circumstances. The act aims to dismantle criminal networks tied to this illicit drug trade and bolster regional and global security.

Published

2024-04-16
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed in House
Date: 2024-04-16
Package ID: BILLS-118hr4681eh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
6
Words:
2,276
Pages:
14
Sentences:
48

Language

Nouns: 654
Verbs: 155
Adjectives: 128
Adverbs: 28
Numbers: 96
Entities: 131

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.37
Average Sentence Length:
47.42
Token Entropy:
5.21
Readability (ARI):
26.36

AnalysisAI

The "Illicit Captagon Trafficking Suppression Act of 2023" outlines measures to combat the production and distribution of captagon, a harmful stimulant primarily associated with the regime of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria and supported by the group Hizballah. This legislation aims to impose sanctions on foreign entities and individuals engaged in the illicit captagon trade, which threatens both regional stability and global security. The Act empowers the President to block assets and deny U.S. entry to those involved in these illegal activities, while allowing for certain exceptions and waivers.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the primary concerns stemming from the bill is the latitude given to the President to waive sanctions, particularly under the guise of national security. This broad discretion might result in unwarranted exemptions without rigorous oversight, raising issues about checks and balances and accountability. Moreover, the criteria for determining who is complicit in illicit captagon activities are not clearly defined, which could lead to inconsistent enforcement and legal challenges over due process. The section mandating presidential determinations lacks specified oversight and accountability mechanisms, potentially allowing for arbitrary or inconsistent sanctions application.

Further complicating matters, the humanitarian waiver process features ambiguous language on what qualifies as a necessary humanitarian need, which might lead to inconsistency in its application. Importantly, the bill does not detail consequences if the President fails to submit timely reports, thus weakening transparency and compliance. Additionally, terms like "significant risk" could be subject to varying interpretations, potentially leading to inconsistent enforcement.

Lastly, the technical nature of the captagon definition might hinder public understanding and complicate enforcement if not carefully explained.

Impact on the Public

The potential impact of this bill on the general public may be multifaceted. On a broad scale, by addressing illicit captagon trafficking, the legislation seeks to enhance global and regional security, indirectly safeguarding U.S. national interests. However, the bill's ambiguous language in key areas could result in ineffective enforcement or unintended legal challenges that hinder its implementation. This ambiguity might reduce the bill's effectiveness in achieving its goal of curbing illicit drug trafficking.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Several stakeholders could be directly affected by this legislation. Governmental authorities tasked with enforcing the bill may face challenges given the undefined criteria and broad waiver exemptions. They may struggle to consistently interpret and apply sanctions given the subjective language within the bill. Non-governmental organizations engaged in humanitarian work might be caught in regulatory crossfire if their activities inadvertently fall under the bill's broad definitions.

On the other hand, the bill could positively impact regions destabilized by captagon trafficking if effectively implemented. Targeting those involved in illicit drug production and distribution may undermine criminal networks and reduce drug-related violence and corruption. This, in turn, could bolster regional stability and promote lawful social structures.

In conclusion, while the "Illicit Captagon Trafficking Suppression Act of 2023" endeavors to tackle a significant international challenge, its potential success heavily relies on the clarity of its definitions and the robustness of its enforcement and oversight mechanisms. Without addressing these gaps, the bill could lead to inconsistent applications and potentially undermine its core objectives.

Issues

  • The section allowing the President to waive sanctions due to national security interests (Section 4, Waiver) might be seen as overly broad and could potentially allow undue exemptions without stringent criteria, raising concern about checks and balances and accountability.

  • The criteria for determining who is involved in illicit captagon activities are not clearly outlined (Section 4, Imposition of sanctions), leading to potential inconsistencies in enforcement and legal challenges regarding due process.

  • The lack of specified oversight or accountability mechanisms for the determination and reporting process within the sanctions framework (Section 5, Determinations) could lead to arbitrary or inconsistent application of sanctions.

  • The broad definition of 'illicit proliferation' (Section 6, Definitions) could lead to overreach in legal interpretation, affecting individuals or entities that engage in legitimate activities without clear guidelines.

  • The waiver process for humanitarian purposes (Section 4, Humanitarian waiver) features ambiguous language on what qualifies as 'important to address a humanitarian need,' potentially leading to inconsistent humanitarian assistance applications.

  • The bill does not define clear consequences for the President's failure to provide the required report on time (Section 5, Determinations), which could undermine compliance and transparency.

  • Terms such as 'significant risk' (Section 4, Imposition of sanctions) are subjective and might allow for varying interpretations and enforcement actions, resulting in legal uncertainties.

  • The definition of 'captagon' (Section 6, Definitions) is technically detailed, which could complicate public understanding and enforcement if not thoroughly explained in practical terms.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act states that it can be officially referred to as the "Illicit Captagon Trafficking Suppression Act of 2023."

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress acknowledges that the production and trafficking of the drug captagon, largely managed by the Syrian Government and supported by groups like Hizballah, is becoming more advanced. This illegal trade threatens both regional and global security by supporting various criminal and militant groups.

3. Statement of policy Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The policy of the United States aims to target and weaken individuals, groups, and networks linked to the Syrian government in order to break down criminal organizations involved in activities like drug trafficking, particularly those connected to President Bashar al-Assad's regime and Hizballah.

4. Imposition of sanctions with respect to illicit captagon trafficking Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes sanctions against foreign individuals involved in illegal activities related to the captagon drug, allowing the President to block their assets and deny them entry into the U.S. However, exceptions and waivers are available for humanitarian, intelligence, international obligation, and law enforcement purposes, with the President holding the authority to implement and regulate these sanctions.

5. Determinations with respect to the government of syria, hizballah, and networks affiliated with the government of syria or hizballah Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the President to decide within 180 days if certain foreign individuals connected to the government of Syria or Hizballah should face sanctions. The President must report to Congress about these individuals, detailing whether sanctions are imposed and explaining any decisions not to impose them, and provide a justification if applicable.

6. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, several key terms are defined. These include the committees considered "appropriate congressional committees," substances categorized under "captagon," the meaning of "foreign person" and "illicit proliferation," and the definition of "United States person."