Overview
Title
To award 3 Congressional Gold Medals to the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men’s Ice Hockey Team, in recognition of their extraordinary achievement at the 1980 Winter Olympics where, being comprised of amateur collegiate players, they defeated the dominant Soviet hockey team in the historic Miracle on Ice, revitalizing American morale at the height of the Cold War, inspiring generations and transforming the sport of hockey in the United States.
ELI5 AI
The bill proposes to give special medals to the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team to celebrate their big win against the Soviet team, and these medals will be shown at important places related to hockey and sports in the U.S.
Summary AI
H.R. 452 authorizes the awarding of 3 Congressional Gold Medals to the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team. This recognition is for their remarkable achievement at the 1980 Winter Olympics where they, as amateur collegiate players, defeated the Soviet Union in the famed "Miracle on Ice." The medals will be displayed at the Lake Placid Olympic Center, the United States Hockey Hall of Fame, and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Museum. Additionally, bronze duplicates of these medals may be sold to help cover costs.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The legislation titled the "Miracle on Ice Congressional Gold Medal Act" seeks to honor the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team. This team achieved a historic victory at the Lake Placid Winter Olympics by defeating the Soviet Union in a game popularly known as the "Miracle on Ice." To commemorate their achievement, the bill proposes awarding three Congressional Gold Medals to be displayed at specified institutions: the Lake Placid Olympic Center, the United States Hockey Hall of Fame, and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Museum. The bill also allows for the creation and sale of duplicate bronze medals to cover production costs and stipulates that these medals be recognized as national and numismatic items.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the proposed legislation:
Expenditure Concerns: The awarding of three gold medals could be considered unnecessary expenditure if not shown to provide sufficient public or diplomatic benefits.
Selection of Institutions: The designation of specific locations for displaying the medals may appear biased if the selection criteria are not transparent.
Ambiguity and Clarity: Certain phrases like "shall be displayed as appropriate and made available for research" and terms like "overhead expenses" are vague, leading to potential inconsistencies or misuse.
Production and Sales of Duplicates: The bill does not limit the number of bronze duplicates nor clarify how their sale price will be determined, which could lead to financial inefficiencies.
Use of Public Funds: The bill authorizes the use of funds from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund without setting clear limits, which could result in unchecked expenditures.
Impact on the Public Broadly
The bill celebrates a key moment in American sports history, potentially boosting national pride and recognizing a victory that was significant during the Cold War era. However, the public might question the financial prudence of the bill, especially if the allocation of funds for the medals does not align with broader public interests.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Members of the 1980 Ice Hockey Team & Historians: The team members and those interested in sports history stand to benefit significantly from this recognition, as it immortalizes their achievement in prominent locations.
Institutions Receiving Medals: The selected institutions could gain increased attention and visitor engagement through the display of these medals. However, the choice of these institutions might raise questions about favoritism or regional biases.
Taxpayers and Fiscal Watchdogs: Individuals concerned with government spending might see the bill as frivolous in light of unclear justifications for the medal awards and associated costs.
Overall, while the bill honors a historic event in American sports, ensuring financial accountability, transparency in institutional selection, and clarity of language will be crucial for gaining broader public support and avoiding potential controversies.
Issues
The awarding of three gold medals might be perceived as an unnecessary expenditure of taxpayer funds if not demonstrated to provide significant public or diplomatic value. This issue is encapsulated in Section 3.
The lack of specific criteria or justification for selecting the Lake Placid Olympic Center, United States Hockey Hall of Fame, and U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Museum to receive the gold medals could be seen as favoritism, as noted in Section 3.
The ambiguity in the phrase 'shall be displayed as appropriate and made available for research' in Section 3 could lead to inconsistencies in how the gold medals are handled by the recipient institutions.
Section 4 does not specify a limit on the number of duplicate bronze medals, leaving potential for overproduction and misuse, which raises ethical and financial concerns.
The term 'overhead expenses' in Section 4 is vague, which might lead to financial misinterpretation or misuse of funds related to the production of duplicate medals.
Section 4 lacks clarity on how the price for duplicate bronze medals will be determined, potentially leading to financial inefficiencies and misunderstandings about pricing criteria.
There is no information about how or where the bronze duplicates will be sold in Section 4, potentially impacting transparency and oversight.
The absence of auditing or reporting requirements in Section 4 could compromise accountability in the production and sale process of duplicate medals.
Section 6 authorizes the use of funds without specifying a limit, potentially leading to unchecked financial expenditures from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.
The term 'such amounts as may be necessary' in Section 6 lacks specificity, creating potential for vague determination of spending limits and uses.
A lack of detail on how proceeds from the sale of duplicate medals will be used, as noted in Section 6, could lead to questions about financial transparency and accountability.
The designation of medals as 'national medals' and 'numismatic items' in Section 5 lacks explanatory context, which might leave both the public and stakeholders unclear about the practical significance of these terms.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the official name of the bill, which is called the “Miracle on Ice Congressional Gold Medal Act.”
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress finds that the 1980 USA Olympic men's ice hockey team famously won the gold medal at the Lake Placid Winter Olympics by defeating the Soviet Union in what is known as the "Miracle on Ice." This victory was significant for American hockey, increasing the sport's popularity and participation across the nation, and leading to a surge in American-born players in the National Hockey League.
3. Congressional gold medals Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The U.S. Congress authorized the creation and presentation of three gold medals to honor the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men’s Ice Hockey Team for their significant victory over the Soviet team. These medals will be displayed at the Lake Placid Olympic Center, the United States Hockey Hall of Fame, and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Museum.
4. Duplicate medals Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary has the authority to make and sell bronze replicas of the gold medals made under a previous section. These replicas will be sold at a price that covers all production costs, including labor, materials, and other related expenses.
5. Status of medals Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines that the medals created under this Act are recognized as national medals according to federal law, and are also considered collectible items, known as numismatic items, under specific sections of the United States Code.
6. Authority to use fund amounts; proceeds of sale Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section grants permission to use funds from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund to cover the costs of making medals as described in this Act. Additionally, any money earned from selling duplicate bronze medals will be added back into the same fund.