Overview
Title
To amend title 41, United States Code, to prohibit the Federal Government from entering into contracts with an entity that discriminates against the firearm and ammunition industry, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 45 is a rule that says the government can't make deals with companies that treat gun and bullet businesses unfairly, and if a company breaks this rule, they could get in big trouble and lose the deal.
Summary AI
H.R. 45, also known as the Firearm Industry Non-Discrimination Act, aims to prevent the federal government from entering into contracts with companies that discriminate against the firearm and ammunition industry. It requires inclusion of clauses in federal contracts that ensure companies do not have policies that unfairly target firearm-related businesses. If a prime contractor violates this provision, their contract can be terminated and they may face suspension or debarment. The bill applies to contracts awarded after the act is enacted and excludes sole-source contracts.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, H.R. 45, introduced in the 119th Congress, seeks to amend title 41 of the United States Code to prohibit the federal government from entering into contracts with entities that discriminate against the firearm and ammunition industries. The legislation is referred to as the "Firearm Industry Non-Discrimination Act" or the "FIND Act." Its primary provision is to ensure that government contracts for the procurement of goods or services do not go to companies with policies or practices that can be interpreted as discriminatory against these industries. The bill includes stipulations for prime contractors and extends to their first-tier subcontractors. It mandates certification of non-discrimination, with specific enforcement clauses and penalties for non-compliance, while also allowing exceptions under certain conditions, such as sole-source contracts.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the bill's significant issues lies in its complex definition of "discrimination." The bill attempts to outline detailed criteria to prevent entities from unfairly targeting the firearm and ammunition industry. However, the language used is broad and open to interpretation, which could lead to enforcement challenges and legal complexities. Additionally, the requirement for contractors to certify no discriminatory policies might be perceived as favoring the firearm industry, possibly alienating companies with legitimate reasons for their business decisions related to firearms.
The penalties outlined for non-compliance, including the termination of contracts and further proceedings, may deter companies from engaging in government contracts, especially if they perceive these penalties as disproportionate. Furthermore, the bill provides an exception for sole-source contracts, potentially creating inconsistencies and opportunities for favoritism or loopholes to circumvent the intended prohibitions.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, if enacted, the bill aims to ensure that the firearm and ammunition industries do not face discrimination from potential government contractors. This could enhance opportunities for businesses in these sectors by ensuring they can compete equally for government contracts. However, the bill might lead to a reduction in the pool of eligible contractors if businesses choose to avoid certifications to escape associated penalties or administrative burdens.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The primary stakeholders, the firearm, and ammunition industries, might positively experience reduced discrimination and increased market opportunities with federal contracts. On the other hand, industries or companies with policies deemed discriminatory against the firearm sector could face exclusion from lucrative federal contracts, potentially impacting their operations.
The impact on government procurement processes could be twofold—administrative complexities might arise from the requirement for certifications and management of penalties, potentially leading to increased costs and procedural delays. Furthermore, advocacy groups for gun control might view this bill negatively, interpreting it as providing undue protection to the firearms industry at a time when there might be calls for more regulatory oversight.
In essence, while the bill aims at fairness and equal treatment for the firearm industry, its implementation could lead to significant administrative and legal burdens for both government entities and potential contractors, with divergent implications for various stakeholders based on their policy stances and operational practices.
Issues
The language regarding discrimination is complex and might be open to different interpretations, particularly the definition of 'discriminate' in Section 2, subsection (c)(1). This complexity could lead to enforcement challenges and varying interpretations in legal contexts.
The requirement for contractors to certify they have no discriminatory policies against firearm entities or trade associations in Section 4715, subsections (a)(1) and (a)(2), could be seen as favoritism towards the firearm industry, potentially excluding companies with valid reasons for their policies.
The penalties for violation, including termination of the prime contract for default and initiation of suspension or debarment proceedings in Section 4715, subsection (a)(3), may be perceived as severe, potentially discouraging contractors from engaging with this clause.
The exception for sole-source contracts from these requirements, as stated in Section 4715, subsection (b), might create an inconsistency in the application of non-discrimination policies and lead to favoritism or circumvention of the prohibition.
The complexity and specificity of definitions, such as 'firearm entity' and 'firearm trade association' in Section 4715, subsection (c)(2) and (c)(3), could lead to unintentional loopholes or exclusions, affecting the applicability and enforcement of the bill.
The requirement for a subcontractor to certify non-discrimination with respect to firearm entities only applies to first-tier subcontracts exceeding 10 percent of a contract's value, potentially allowing discrimination in lower-tier subcontracts or smaller agreements, as outlined in Section 4715, subsection (a)(2).
The clause requiring certification in writing might create additional bureaucratic hurdles and increase administrative costs for both the government and contractors, as mentioned in Section 2.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that it may be officially referred to as the "Firearm Industry Non-Discrimination Act" or the "FIND Act."
2. Prohibition on entering into contracts with entities discriminating against the firearm and ammunition industry Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section prohibits U.S. government agencies from contracting with companies that discriminate against the firearm and ammunition industry. It requires contractors to confirm they don't have policies against the industry, and if violated, contracts may be terminated, except for sole-source contracts.
4715. Prohibition on entering into contracts with entities discriminating against the firearm and ammunition industry. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits government contracts with companies that discriminate against the firearm and ammunition industry by requiring them to certify non-discrimination in their policies. It mandates contract clauses for both prime contractors and their subcontractors, while providing penalties for violations and an exception for sole-source contracts.