Overview

Title

An Act To extend the authorization of the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program of the Department of Homeland Security.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to keep a special program running until 2025 that helps protect places with lots of chemicals from being hurt by bad people. Congress is thinking about it because the permission for the program was supposed to end in 2023.

Summary AI

H. R. 4470 aims to continue the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program run by the Department of Homeland Security until 2025. This program is intended to protect chemical facilities in the United States from potential terrorist attacks. The bill proposes amending a prior law to extend the program’s authorization period, which was originally set to end in 2023. The House of Representatives passed the bill on July 25, 2023, and it is now under review in the Senate.

Published

2023-07-26
Congress: 118
Session: 1
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Received in Senate
Date: 2023-07-26
Package ID: BILLS-118hr4470rds

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
170
Pages:
2
Sentences:
9

Language

Nouns: 63
Verbs: 10
Adjectives: 1
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 15
Entities: 26

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.37
Average Sentence Length:
18.89
Token Entropy:
4.19
Readability (ARI):
11.90

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

This piece of legislation is titled the “Protecting and Securing Chemical Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2023.” It primarily aims to extend the authorization of the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) Program, overseen by the Department of Homeland Security. Originally set to expire in 2023, the bill seeks to extend the program's authorization until 2025. This program plays a vital role in ensuring the security of chemical facilities, which can be potential targets for terrorist attacks. By extending its authorization, the bill intends to ensure continued oversight and protection of these critical infrastructure components.

Significant Issues

Despite the straightforward nature of the bill, several issues arise from its brief content. Firstly, Section 2 of the bill changes the expiration year from 2023 to 2025 but does not clearly justify the need for this extension or its intended impact. The absence of detailed reasoning might lead to ambiguity about why this specific timeframe was chosen and how it aligns with broader security goals.

Moreover, the bill lacks specific details regarding budget implications, which could affect financial oversight and planning. Without understanding the cost of the extension, it is challenging to evaluate its efficiency and fiscal responsibility.

Additionally, there is no mention of how this extension would affect current or future regulatory requirements or whether any additional resources would be necessary. This omission might result in uncertainties regarding regulatory compliance and resource allocation.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The impact of this bill on the public could be reflected in the improved security of chemical facilities, which could translate to enhanced community safety. However, the lack of detailed justifications could lead to public skepticism, especially regarding the financial and regulatory implications of the extension.

For stakeholders directly involved with chemical facilities, such as facility operators and employees, the bill's passage could mean sustained security measures and possible adjustments in compliance processes due to the extended authorization. However, uncertainties surrounding additional resources or regulatory changes could present operational challenges.

Government bodies, particularly the Department of Homeland Security, may face the pressure of continuing CFATS program operations without a clear outline of how the extension might be enacted or funded. This might impact their strategic planning and execution of security measures.

In summary, while the bill seeks to maintain the essential security framework provided by the CFATS Program, the lack of detailed rationales and considerations in its text could lead to operational and budgetary uncertainties, affecting various stakeholders in different ways.

Issues

  • The extension from 2023 to 2025 in Section 2 lacks a detailed justification or explanation, leading to ambiguity about why the extension period is necessary and its potential impact.

  • Section 2 does not provide specific details regarding the budget implications of extending the authorization, which may affect oversight on spending.

  • The bill does not address how the extension might influence current or future regulatory requirements or if additional resources will be necessary, introducing potential uncertainties.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section provides the short title of the Act, which is called the “Protecting and Securing Chemical Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2023.”

2. Extension of authorization of Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program of the Department of Homeland Security Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section extends the authorization for the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program under the Department of Homeland Security from 2023 to 2025.