Overview
Title
An Act To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act to make improvements to that Act, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The H.R. 4389 bill is like giving a little extra money from the government to help protect migrating birds, and it makes some changes to the rules to make sure everything is clear and fair. It also says people need to show how well they're working together to take care of the birds, and they plan to keep helping with money until 2028.
Summary AI
The H.R. 4389 bill proposes amendments to the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act. It intends to increase the federal cost-share requirement from 25% to 33.3%, mandates a report to Congress about the implementation of cooperation provisions, and extends authorization for appropriations through 2028. Additionally, it makes technical corrections by updating certain definitions and sentence structures within the Act.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
H.R. 4389, titled the "Migratory Birds of the Americas Conservation Enhancements Act of 2023," proposes several amendments to the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act. This legislation is primarily aimed at enhancing conservation efforts for migratory birds that travel between the Americas. The key changes include increasing federal funding for bird conservation projects, extending the period for which funding is authorized, requiring more detailed reporting to Congress on cooperation efforts, and making technical corrections to existing statutory language.
Significant Issues
One of the major changes the bill introduces is the increase in the federal funding share from 25% to 33.3%. This adjustment may raise questions about the costs associated with implementing conservation projects and how that might impact federal budgets and other priorities. Additionally, extending the authorization of appropriations to 2028 ties financial considerations for a longer duration, possibly affecting how government funds are distributed among various environmental and non-environmental initiatives. The requirement for the Secretary to report to Congress regarding cooperation efforts aims to enhance accountability, but also demands thorough and transparent communication, which could be challenging to maintain consistently. Furthermore, the bill makes technical corrections to the act's language, which might unintentionally affect those who rely on the law’s definitions for their operations.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill could result in increased resources and attention on the conservation of neotropical migratory birds, which are vital for ecological balance and biodiversity. Making more federal funds available could lead to more robust conservation projects, potentially improving habitats and decreasing threats to these species. This might positively impact ecotourism sectors and environmental groups advocating for wildlife conservation. However, the increased financial commitment may also lead to budget reallocations, which could affect funding available for other programs and services that the public relies on.
Impact on Stakeholders
The stakeholders most directly impacted by this bill would include conservation organizations, government agencies, and communities involved in or near migratory bird habitats. Conservation organizations may benefit from increased funding and support, allowing them more resources to pursue and implement conservation projects. Government agencies tasked with overseeing these efforts may see increased workloads due to the intensified reporting requirements instituted by the new amendments. Likewise, communities involved in conservation and those that depend on ecotourism might see economic benefits from enhanced conservation efforts and increased bird populations. However, certain industry stakeholders might view increased conservation funding and constraints as a burden if they lead to tighter regulations that could limit land use or development activities near protected areas.
Issues
The increase in the Federal share from 25 percent to 33.3 percent, as specified in Section 2(a), could raise concerns about the financial implications and the burden on federal resources for funding bird conservation projects. This change might also influence how projects are prioritized and funded, which could affect the distribution of resources across different conservation initiatives.
The amendment extending the authorization of appropriations to 2028 in Section 2(c) involves financial considerations as it potentially allocates federal funds for a longer period, which could influence budget planning and allocations for other programs.
There may be concerns about transparency and accountability related to Section 2(b), which requires the Secretary to submit a report to Congress. Ensuring thorough documentation and clear communication regarding the implementation of the advisory group's activities is crucial for ongoing legislative oversight and public trust.
The technical corrections in Section 2(d), while seemingly minor, may have unintended consequences if previous definitions were in practice and entities affected by the Act were relying on those definitions. The removal and redesignation of paragraphs in the statute require careful review to ensure they do not disrupt current understanding or operations.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The short title of this Act is the “Migratory Birds of the Americas Conservation Enhancements Act of 2023”, which serves to identify the legislation.
2. Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act amendments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act include increasing the federal funding share from 25% to 33.3%, requiring a report to Congress on cooperation efforts within 180 days, extending the authorization of appropriations until 2028, and making technical corrections to definitions and language in the Act.