Overview
Title
To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from changing energy conservation standards for distribution transformers for a certain period, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill says that for five years, no one is allowed to change the rules about how much energy devices called distribution transformers can use. It's like saying we have to keep using the same kind of toy without changing it, even if new and better ones come out.
Summary AI
The bill titled “Protecting America’s Distribution Transformer Supply Chain Act” aims to prevent the U.S. Secretary of Energy from changing the energy conservation standards for distribution transformers for five years after the law is enacted. This is to maintain the existing standards as set in a previous rule from April 18, 2013, and to avoid any new requirements that might arise during this period. The intention is to stabilize regulations regarding distribution transformers for a certain time frame.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Protecting America’s Distribution Transformer Supply Chain Act," seeks to establish a five-year moratorium on the Secretary of Energy's ability to revise energy conservation standards specifically for distribution transformers. These transformers are critical components in the power grid that help distribute electrical energy more efficiently. The bill stipulates that standards should remain as outlined in the 2013 Energy Conservation Program regulation until five years after the enactment of this legislation.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the key issues raised by this bill is its potential to hinder progress in energy conservation. By prohibiting updates to standards for a five-year span, there is a risk that new energy-saving technologies might not be incorporated into the existing framework in a timely manner. This could slow down improvements in energy efficiency related to distribution transformers.
A further issue is the bill's specific adherence to the 2013 standards, which could render the rules outdated as technology and energy demands evolve. The inability to adapt could negatively impact innovation and hinder the introduction of more advanced and efficient transformers.
Additionally, the wording of the bill raises concerns about potential conflicts with other sections of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. The use of the phrase "Notwithstanding any provision of part B or part C of title III" might create confusion and legal challenges, as it appears to take precedence over other mandates within the Act.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the direct impacts of this bill may not be immediately noticeable. However, if energy standards do not evolve alongside technological advances, there could be long-term implications. This could result in higher energy costs and less effective energy conservation, which in turn may impact consumers' utility bills as well as broader environmental goals.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders in the energy industry, especially manufacturers and suppliers of distribution transformers, the bill presents both positive and negative potential impacts. On one hand, it provides regulatory certainty by locking in existing standards, allowing stakeholders to plan without anticipating fluctuations in compliance requirements. On the other hand, it could stifle innovation, as companies may have less incentive to invest in developing more efficient transformers if the standards remain stagnant for half a decade.
Environmental advocates may view this bill negatively, as it could delay the adoption of technologies that contribute to reducing carbon footprints and achieving energy efficiency goals. Conversely, entities concerned with regulatory overreach might support the legislation as it prevents immediate changes and maintains stable standards for an extended period.
In summary, while the act provides a framework of stability for distribution transformer standards, it also poses challenges in terms of adaptability and progress in energy conservation, highlighting the tension between regulatory certainty and the need for modernization in response to emerging technologies.
Issues
The prohibition of changes to energy conservation standards for distribution transformers for a period of 5 years (Section 2) might delay the implementation of new and potentially beneficial energy-saving measures, potentially impacting energy efficiency goals negatively.
Restricting the Secretary of Energy from updating the standards could block adaptability and responsiveness to new technological advancements or energy needs, which is mandated in Section 2.
The specific reference to adhere to the final rule published on April 18, 2013 (Section 2) might lead to outdated standards, preventing innovation and improvement in energy conservation for distribution transformers.
The phrase 'Notwithstanding any provision of part B or part C of title III' in Section 2 might introduce conflicts with other sections of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, potentially causing ambiguities in compliance and enforcement.
The short title provided in Section 1 does not give clear insight into the overall purpose of the Act, leading to potential misunderstandings or lack of public awareness about its objectives.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act establishes its official name as the "Protecting America’s Distribution Transformer Supply Chain Act."
2. Energy conservation standards for distribution transformers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section restricts the Secretary of Energy from making any new rules for distribution transformers that differ from the existing 2013 standards under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, for a period of five years from the enactment of this section.