Overview
Title
To amend the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act to extend the deadline by which TikTok must be sold in order to avoid being banned.
ELI5 AI
In this bill, they want to give TikTok more time to make changes so that it can keep working in the United States instead of getting banned. They want to change the time limit from about 9 months to about 18 months.
Summary AI
H.R. 391 proposes to amend a law called the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act. The amendment seeks to extend the time period allowed for TikTok to be sold, from 270 days to 540 days, in order to avoid a ban in the United States. This bill was introduced by Mr. Khanna and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The bill, titled the "Extend the TikTok Deadline Act," was introduced in the 119th Congress and aims to amend an existing law, the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act. This amendment specifically seeks to extend the deadline by which TikTok must be sold to prevent it from being banned in the United States. Originally, the deadline was set to 270 days, but this bill proposes to extend it to 540 days. By providing a longer timeframe, the bill allows for additional time for the sale processes to be completed.
Summary of Significant Issues
One significant issue with the bill is the lack of clarity surrounding the necessity for extending the deadline from 270 to 540 days. The bill does not provide any rationale or justification for why this extension is required. This deficit raises questions about the motivations behind the change and the potential implications of granting more time.
Additionally, the bill's language is quite brief and lacks context that would help stakeholders understand the broader circumstances that make this deadline extension necessary. The absence of detailed information regarding stakeholders further complicates the understanding of the bill and may give rise to concerns about conflicts of interest or if any specific parties are being unduly favored by this extension.
Potential Public Impact
Broadly, this bill could impact the public by delaying any immediate changes to TikTok’s availability and functionality in the United States. For regular users who enjoy the platform for entertainment and social interaction, this extension might be seen positively, as it grants more time before any potential sale-induced disruptions occur. On the other hand, those who perceive TikTok as a security threat due to its foreign ownership might view the extension as problematic, as it prolongs the period before the app must comply with regulations aimed at protecting national security.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For the stakeholders directly involved in the potential sale of TikTok, including its parent company ByteDance and potential buyers, this deadline extension could provide much-needed time to negotiate and finalize the terms of a deal. While this may be seen as beneficial, the lack of transparency regarding the reasons for the deadline extension might foster suspicion or skepticism about the process and its intent.
For legislators and policymakers concerned with national security and data privacy issues, the bill's provisions might seem inadequate without clear justifications for extending the timeline and the absence of specific safeguards or measures to address ongoing concerns during this interim period.
In summary, while the legislation provides a straightforward extension of time by which TikTok must be sold, the bill’s lack of detail and rationale introduces ambiguities that might impact the public's perception and trust, as well as casting uncertainty about the motivations and implications of this legal maneuver on various stakeholders.
Issues
The bill extends the deadline for TikTok to be sold from '270 days' to '540 days' to avoid being banned, but insufficient justification is provided for why such an extension is necessary. This lack of rationale may raise questions about the motivations and implications of the extension. (Section 2)
The bill's short title and description are vague and lack adequate context, leaving uncertainty about the specific circumstances necessitating the extension and its potential impact on stakeholders. There is no clarification of what the original and new deadlines actually mean in terms of dates or context. (Section 1)
The absence of detailed information about stakeholders affected by this legislation raises potential concerns about conflicts of interest or favoritism towards certain parties involved in the decision to extend the deadline. (Section 1)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act establishes that it may be referred to as the "Extend the TikTok Deadline Act."
2. Extension of deadline Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 2 of the bill changes the deadline in an existing law, the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, from 270 days to 540 days.