Overview

Title

To amend title 18, United States Code, to improve the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act and provisions relating to the carrying of concealed weapons by law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 354, also known as the "LEOSA Reform Act of 2024," is a plan to let police officers carry their hidden guns more often, even in some places where they couldn’t before, like certain federal buildings and schools, while setting new rules for their training.

Summary AI

H.R. 354, titled the "LEOSA Reform Act of 2024," aims to amend laws related to the carrying of concealed firearms by law enforcement officers in the United States. The bill seeks to enhance the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act by allowing qualified officers to carry firearms in certain federal buildings and conforming it with the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. It also sets new standards for the required firearms training of these officers. Moreover, it defines the types of federal facilities where officers can carry firearms, including those that are accessible to the general public.

Published

2024-05-14
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-05-14
Package ID: BILLS-118hr354rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
1,515
Pages:
8
Sentences:
20

Language

Nouns: 485
Verbs: 115
Adjectives: 36
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 69
Entities: 114

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.80
Average Sentence Length:
75.75
Token Entropy:
4.92
Readability (ARI):
37.62

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, known as the "LEOSA Reform Act of 2024," aims to amend title 18 of the United States Code. The primary focus of this bill is to improve the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act (LEOSA) and clarify provisions related to carrying concealed weapons by law enforcement officers, encompassing both currently serving and retired personnel. Additionally, the bill modifies existing laws such as the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and sections governing the carrying of firearms in certain federal facilities. Collectively, these amendments seek to address issues related to concealed firearm carrying permissions for law enforcement personnel, redefine qualifying standards for firearm training, and adjust firearm regulations in particular public spaces.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several notable issues arise from the amendments proposed in this bill:

  1. Expansion of Carry Rights: The bill broadens who is allowed to carry firearms in gun-free school zones under LEOSA. The language authorizing this expansion creates some ambiguity, possibly allowing unintended individuals access to firearms in these sensitive areas, raising public safety concerns.

  2. Firearms Qualification Standards: Changes to qualification standards for firearms training introduce the possibility of inconsistent enforcement across states. The option for states to set qualification standards up to 36 months raises concerns about uneven standards and inconsistent training efficacy.

  3. Firearms in Federal Facilities: The allowance for law enforcement to carry weapons in certain federal facilities lacks a detailed outline of oversight mechanisms, potentially compromising security and accountability.

Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders

The impact of this bill on the public and stakeholders can be nuanced:

  • Public Safety Concerns: By potentially expanding the scope of individuals permitted to carry concealed weapons in previously restricted areas such as schools, this bill could lead to heightened safety concerns amongst the general public. While intended to enhance law enforcement officers' protection, it could inadvertently increase the risk of firearms in sensitive areas if not stringently regulated.

  • Law Enforcement Officers: Current and retired law enforcement officers stand to benefit directly from the expanded rights and clarified training standards, which could lead to greater confidence and compliance in carrying firearms when off-duty.

  • State and Local Authorities: States may face challenges in implementing the extended qualification periods and ensuring consistency in training certifications. Some authorities may struggle with aligning these new federal standards with existing practices, which could complicate enforcement and training uniformity.

  • Federal Facility Management: By allowing more individuals to carry firearms in certain federal facilities, facility managers might need to reassess their security protocols and ensure that appropriate measures are in place to maintain safety.

Overall, while the bill intends to streamline and enhance rights and regulations for law enforcement officers, its implications must be carefully weighed to balance the benefits with the responsibilities necessary to ensure public safety and procedural consistency across jurisdictions.

Issues

  • The amendment to Section 2 potentially expands the scope of individuals allowed to carry firearms in gun-free school zones under the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act, which could lead to public safety concerns if not properly regulated. The language 'by an individual authorized by section 926B or 926C to carry a concealed firearm' creates ambiguity regarding who qualifies, possibly allowing unauthorized individuals access to firearms in these zones.

  • Changes in Section 3 related to firearms qualification standards might lead to inconsistencies or disparities in enforcement across different states. The option for states to extend firearms qualification standards up to 36 months could result in uneven enforcement standards, while the amendments risk varied interpretation regarding who qualifies as a certified firearms instructor.

  • Amendments in Section 4 allow carrying firearms in certain federal facilities but lack clear requirements or limitations on oversight, raising security and accountability concerns. The terms 'Facility Security Level I or II' and 'civilian public access facility' are open-ended, which could lead to varying interpretations by different security agencies.

  • The reference to sections 926B and 926C without detailing their content in the amendment text throughout Sections 2, 3, and 4 may necessitate additional research for full comprehension, complicating immediate understanding of their implications for those without a legal background.

  • The amendment in Section 3 regarding exclusion of certain properties from laws, such as 'common or contract carrier' properties, lacks clear definition, potentially confusing enforcement of these laws.

  • Changes in language regarding certifications for firearms training in Section 3 may lead to inconsistencies or confusion about what qualifies as acceptable certification or who is recognized as a certified firearms instructor.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill is titled the “LEOSA Reform Act of 2024”, which stands for Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act Reform.

2. Conforming the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act and the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the United States Code to allow individuals who are authorized under certain sections to carry a concealed firearm to legally carry one in areas that were previously restricted by the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990.

3. Making improvements to the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends parts of the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act by expanding the circumstances where law enforcement officers can carry firearms, clarifying the types of properties where certain state laws don't apply, adding that any type of magazine counts as a firearm component, and updating the requirements for firearms training qualifications, specifying acceptable standards and who can certify them.

4. Permitting qualified current and retired law enforcement officers to carry firearms in certain Federal facilities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows current and retired qualified law enforcement officers to carry firearms in certain federal facilities classified as Facility Security Level I or II, which are civilian public access facilities. It also defines "Facility Security Level" as a security risk level determined by a facility's security agency and "civilian public access facility" as a facility open to the general public.