Overview
Title
To require the Secretary of Commerce to establish the Sea Turtle Rescue Assistance Grant Program.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 347 is a plan to help sea turtles when they are in trouble, by giving money to people who rescue and take care of them. The rules say this help will last for seven years, but they need to be careful with the money and work together to make sure everything is fair and works well.
Summary AI
H.R. 347, known as the "Sea Turtle Rescue Assistance and Rehabilitation Act of 2025," proposes amending the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 to establish a grant program for sea turtle rescue, rehabilitation, and response. The bill outlines eligibility criteria for obtaining grants, such as compliance with specific environmental laws and standards. It establishes a fund within the U.S. Treasury dedicated to rapid response for sea turtle emergencies. The legislation includes a sunset clause, indicating that the authorities granted will expire seven years after enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the “Sea Turtle Rescue Assistance and Rehabilitation Act of 2025,” aims to enhance efforts in rescuing and rehabilitating sea turtles by amending the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. The bill mandates the establishment of a Sea Turtle Rescue Assistance Grant Program, coordinated by the Secretary of Commerce and the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. The program is designed to provide grants for sea turtle rescue, rehabilitation, and response efforts and sets up a specific fund to facilitate these activities. The initiative is to sunset, or expire, seven years after its enactment unless extended.
Summary of Significant Issues
A key issue is the absence of specified funding limits for the program, which could raise concerns about potential overspending. The bill’s reliance on compliance with other legislative acts, such as the Endangered Species Act, may introduce bureaucratic complexity and potential legal challenges if changes occur in the referenced laws. Additionally, by differentiating the grant criteria between sea turtles and marine mammals and administering them separately, the bill could lead to inefficiencies in execution. Moreover, it is unclear how the program will be evaluated after the seven-year term or what procedures will determine its continuation. Lastly, the establishment and management of new funds without detailed guidance could result in mismanagement concerns.
Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders
Public Impact:
The bill aims to bolster conservation efforts for sea turtles, thereby contributing to the preservation of biodiversity, which can have a positive environmental impact. However, without clear spending limits, taxpayers might be concerned about potential financial mismanagement or inefficiencies in government spending. Overall, increased efforts in protecting endangered species can benefit ecosystems, which, in turn, have long-term positive effects on communities and overall environmental health.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders:
For environmental groups and conservationists, this bill represents a significant advancement in protecting sea turtles, providing structured support and dedicated resources for rescue and rehabilitation missions. However, stakeholders involved in administering the grants might face challenges related to the complex compliance requirements tied to existing legislation. Furthermore, organizations currently engaged in marine mammal conservation may need to adjust operations to accommodate species-specific regulations, potentially increasing operational complexity and requiring additional expertise or resources.
The bill undeniably represents a step forward in marine conservation, yet the issues highlighted suggest a need for more streamlined and transparent mechanisms to ensure that objectives are met efficiently and effectively. As the legislation progresses, these concerns will require careful consideration to maximize the potential benefits and minimize any adverse effects.
Issues
The financial provisions for sea turtle rescue, rehabilitation, and response in Section 2 do not specify the amount or limit for funding, potentially leading to overspending which could be of financial concern to the public.
The grant program outlined in Section 2 relies heavily on criteria and compliance based on other Acts, which could introduce bureaucratic complexity and legal challenges if those Acts change or conflict with this program.
There is a potential for inefficiency due to the differentiation and separate criteria set for sea turtles and marine mammals in Section 2, which could affect the effective administration of the grant program.
The sunset clause in Section 2 references a termination period of 7 years for the authority to execute the program, but it lacks clarity on the review or evaluation process after this time, raising questions about the program's long-term sustainability and effectiveness.
Section 2's establishment of funds without clear guidance on management or funding sources could lead to mismanagement or poor allocation of resources, posing financial and operational risks.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section titled "Short title" specifies that this piece of legislation will be known as the “Sea Turtle Rescue Assistance and Rehabilitation Act of 2025.”
2. Sea turtle rescue, rehabilitation, and response Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines amendments to the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 to establish specific grants and funds for sea turtle rescue, rehabilitation, and response. These amendments detail the eligibility criteria for applying for grants, the conditions attached to such grants, and the establishment of interest-bearing funds, including the Sea Turtle Rescue, Rehabilitation, and Rapid Response Fund, which will be used for emergency assistance before the authority expires seven years after enactment.