Overview

Title

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to molecularly targeted pediatric cancer investigations, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The "Give Kids a Chance Act of 2024" is like making a new rulebook to help find better medicines for kids with cancer, making sure everyone involved works together nicely, and keeping everyone honest about sharing important findings.

Summary AI

H. R. 3433, known as the "Give Kids a Chance Act of 2024," aims to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to improve the investigation of drugs for pediatric cancer by requiring specific targeted studies and enhancing FDA authority. It also extends the priority review voucher program for developing treatments for rare pediatric diseases until 2029 and introduces limitations on the exclusivity of orphan drugs. Additionally, the bill calls for establishing an Abraham Accords Office within the FDA to enhance cooperation with countries involved in the Abraham Accords and outlines provisions for registration fees for the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.

Published

2024-09-20
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-09-20
Package ID: BILLS-118hr3433rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
10
Words:
5,960
Pages:
28
Sentences:
71

Language

Nouns: 1,998
Verbs: 338
Adjectives: 215
Adverbs: 44
Numbers: 243
Entities: 527

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.00
Average Sentence Length:
83.94
Token Entropy:
5.31
Readability (ARI):
42.63

AnalysisAI

The "Give Kids a Chance Act of 2024" is proposed legislation that seeks to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, particularly focusing on pediatric cancer research. The bill introduces new measures to enhance the study and approval processes of drugs targeting pediatric cancers, mandates reports and oversight mechanisms, and establishes a new office within the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as part of an international cooperation effort.

General Summary of the Bill

The primary intent of the bill is to promote the development and availability of drugs specifically for pediatric cancer, addressing regulatory requirements to encourage research and innovation in this critical area. It expands the FDA's authority to require companies to undertake studies relevant to pediatric cancer before approving a drug. The legislation includes provisions to ensure compliance with pediatric study requirement deadlines, promotes transparency in FDA enforcement, and extends the ability to grant priority review vouchers, aiming to incentivize drug manufacturers in developing treatments for rare diseases. An additional component is the establishment of the Abraham Accords Office within the FDA, which aims to enhance cooperation with specific foreign countries.

Significant Issues

Several significant issues arise from this proposed legislation. A central concern is the establishment of the Abraham Accords Office within the FDA. Critics might argue that this office does not directly align with the FDA's primary mission of safeguarding public health, possibly resulting in resource diversion or unnecessary redundancy. Moreover, the bill extends authority for issuing priority review vouchers aimed at expediting drug development for rare pediatric diseases. However, there is a lack of clarity on how these vouchers' effectiveness will be measured, leading to potential advantages for larger companies over smaller competitors, which might engender market imbalances.

Further, changes to the definition of orphan drug approvals could result in ambiguities, leading to potential enforcement challenges. This amendment could result in unforeseen complications due to its retrospective application, possibly prompting legal disputes. Additionally, certain elements within the bill lack clear definitions and criteria, posing risks of inconsistent application and oversight.

Impact on the Public

This legislation could broadly influence public access to drugs specifically designed for pediatric cancers, leading potentially to more tailored treatment options for affected families. By directing the FDA to require and oversee more rigorous pediatric study requirements, the bill could expedite the approval and availability of safe medications for children, greatly benefiting public health.

However, the organization of international cooperation efforts through the new Abraham Accords Office might consume FDA resources without direct consumer benefits, potentially diverting attention from domestic public health priorities.

Impact on Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Companies and Researchers: Drug manufacturers engaged in pediatric cancer research could gain from more structured guidance and potential incentives for drug development. However, smaller companies might be disadvantaged by shifting market dynamics if the priority vouchers predominantly benefit larger competitors.

Regulatory Bodies: The FDA might face challenges in implementing new procedural and enforcement measures while balancing international collaboration demands. The diverse objectives outlined in the bill might stretch resources, leaving less focus on critical areas of domestic drug regulation.

Patients and Families: For families dealing with pediatric cancer, the legislation offers hope for accelerated access to groundbreaking therapies tailored to children. Yet, practical benefits hinge on the effective execution of the bill's mandates, which will depend on robust oversight and responsive regulatory frameworks.

Overall, the "Give Kids a Chance Act of 2024" attempts to meaningfully improve drug access for pediatric cancer treatments while integrating broader international cooperation strategies. Effective implementation will determine the extent to which potential benefits and challenges are realized across various stakeholder groups.

Issues

  • The establishment of an 'Abraham Accords Office' within the FDA (Section 201 and Section 1015) lacks a clear connection to the FDA's primary mission and may result in unnecessary spending. The duties outlined are broad and might overlap with existing international regulatory efforts, leading to redundancy and inefficiency.

  • The extension of authority to issue priority review vouchers for rare pediatric diseases (Section 104) could increase spending without clear oversight on its impact on drug development. The mechanism for assessing the effectiveness of these vouchers is not specified, leading to potential market distortions that could favor larger companies over smaller ones.

  • The amendments to orphan drug approval (Section 105) change the definitions related to 'same approved use or indication', which might create ambiguities and enforcement loopholes. This retroactive application could lead to legal challenges from manufacturers.

  • The vague definition of key terms and lack of specific accountability or evaluation mechanisms in the bill, especially in Sections 101, 102, and 301, could lead to inconsistent enforcement and oversight, posing risks of legal and financial discrepancies.

  • The provision regarding registration fees in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (Section 301) lacks clear guidelines for fee setting and distribution, which may lead to potential biases or favoritism and a lack of transparency in financial management.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill introduces the "Give Kids a Chance Act of 2024" and outlines its table of contents, which includes sections focused on pediatric drug research and authority for the FDA, pediatric study requirements, enforcement reporting, incentives for rare pediatric disease treatments, orphan drug limitations, pediatric drug study programs, and a new Abraham Accords Office within the FDA, among other topics.

101. Research into pediatric uses of drugs; additional authorities of Food and Drug Administration regarding molecularly targeted cancer drugs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to establish new requirements for drug investigations specifically aimed at pediatric cancer, requiring the FDA to ensure these investigations provide meaningful clinical data and specifying conditions under which new drug applications must include these studies. It also mandates the issuance of guidance, applies changes to future applications, and calls for reports to Congress and a study by the GAO on the effectiveness of these requirements.

102. Ensuring completion of pediatric study requirements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text from the bill amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to establish clear guidelines for what happens if companies do not complete necessary pediatric studies for their drugs. It requires that companies receive a warning letter and a chance to respond before any enforcement action is taken, and limits penalties for non-marketed products.

103. FDA report on PREA enforcement Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends part of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act to improve the evaluation of compliance with deadlines and add a requirement for listing penalties related to non-compliance with specific drug requirements. It mandates reporting on compliance and includes details about penalties or settlements for each drug.

104. Extension of authority to issue priority review vouchers to encourage treatments for rare pediatric diseases Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill proposes to extend the authority to issue priority review vouchers for treatments of rare pediatric diseases from September 30, 2024, to September 30, 2029. It also requires a study, conducted by the Government Accountability Office, on the effectiveness of these vouchers in motivating drug development, examining aspects such as the drugs they support, unmet needs addressed, company sizes, and the impact on the FDA's processes.

105. Limitations on exclusive approval or licensure of orphan drugs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section makes changes to rules about orphan drugs, focusing on how "approved use or indication" is defined when it comes to granting exclusive rights to these drugs. It clarifies that these changes apply to all designated orphan drugs, no matter when they were designated or approved.

106. Program for pediatric studies of drugs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The revised section of the Public Health Service Act allows the Director of the NIH to use up to one percent of the funds allocated for pediatric research from each national research institute and center for the years 2025 to 2027 for research under this section.

201. Establishment of Abraham Accords Office within Food and Drug Administration Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Abraham Accords Office is being established within the Food and Drug Administration to strengthen regulatory partnerships with countries that are part of the Abraham Accords. Its main duties include providing technical assistance, facilitating communications, and improving coordination for overseeing medical products. A report on its progress and the cooperation achieved with these partner countries will be submitted to Congress after three years.

1015. Abraham Accords Office Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services is required to set up an Abraham Accords Office within the Food and Drug Administration. This office will be located in one of the Abraham Accords countries and will work with local governments to enhance regulatory oversight related to medical products and provide support and information on U.S. regulatory pathways to relevant parties in these countries.

301. Registration fees Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the Secretary of Health to charge registration fees to members of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for each transplant candidate listed, using the funds to support the network's operations. It also requires transparency by posting fee details online and mandates a review by the Comptroller General two years after enactment to assess activities and suggest improvements.