Overview
Title
To amend the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 to streamline the consideration by State and local governments of requests for modification of certain existing wireless facilities and telecommunications service facilities, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill tries to make it faster and easier for local governments to say "yes" to changes in cell phone towers so that people can get better wireless signals. If the government doesn't decide in 60 days, it's like they're saying "yes" automatically.
Summary AI
The bill, titled the "Broadband Resiliency and Flexible Investment Act," aims to amend the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012. It focuses on making it easier for state and local governments to approve requests for modifying existing wireless and telecommunications facilities, ensuring these requests are considered promptly. The bill establishes a timeline for approval, with requests deemed approved if not acted upon within 60 days, and sets rules on what information can be requested. Additionally, it allows legal action to enforce its provisions and mandates the Federal Communications Commission to issue rules to implement the changes within 180 days of the bill's enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Broadband Resiliency and Flexible Investment Act," introduced as H.R. 339 in the 119th Congress, seeks to amend a previous law, the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012. Its primary aim is to streamline processes for modifying existing wireless and telecommunications facilities by requiring states and local governments to swiftly consider modification requests. If a decision isn't reached within 60 days, the request is automatically approved. The bill defines specific procedures for handling these requests, including detailed requirements for how states and local governments must communicate with requesters.
General Summary
The bill's overarching goal is to expedite the modification processes for existing wireless and telecommunications facilities. It mandates that state and local governments cannot deny and must approve certain eligible requests within a 60-day window unless specific criteria are unmet. The legislation addresses the technicalities of what constitutes a request and how governments must inform requesters if more information is needed. To enforce compliance, the bill allows parties to seek relief through the federal court system.
Significant Issues
One significant issue with the bill is the vagueness surrounding what modifications do not "substantially change" a facility's dimensions. This lack of clarity could lead to varying interpretations, potentially causing disputes. The bill provides a complex mechanism for "deemed approval" of requests, contingent on certain documentation requirements and timelines, which might confuse different governmental bodies about when a request is officially approved. This complexity could lead to administrative burdens and an increase in litigation.
Broad Public Impact
For the general public, the bill promises expedited improvements and adaptations to existing wireless and telecommunications infrastructure. This could enhance connectivity and service reliability, which are increasingly essential in a digital age. The potential acceleration in facility upgrades might also stimulate economic activity related to network enhancements in various regions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts:
Telecommunications Companies: They could benefit from reduced bureaucratic delays and more predictable timelines, allowing for faster deployment of new technologies and services.
Consumers and Businesses: There might be an improvement in telecommunications services, resulting in better coverage and potentially lower costs due to enhanced infrastructure efficiency.
Negative Impacts:
State and Local Governments: These entities may face increased administrative burdens as they adapt to the accelerated timelines and detailed requirements for approving modification requests. The complexity in complying with the act could strain their legal and administrative resources.
Legal System: With the provision for enforcement through expedited judicial review, federal courts might experience an increase in case volume, potentially leading to longer processing times for other cases.
Overall, while the bill holds the promise of modernizing telecommunications infrastructure and reducing delays in service enhancements, it also presents challenges in its implementation due to its potential to strain local administrative systems and the legal framework. This duality of impact must be weighed carefully as the bill progresses through legislative scrutiny.
Issues
The term 'eligible facilities request' in Section 2 might be overly vague, particularly the phrase 'does not substantially change the physical dimensions,' which could lead to different interpretations and potential disputes among parties, affecting the fairness and uniformity of application processes.
The timeline for 'deemed approval' in Section 2 is clearly defined, but the complexity of the language regarding tolling due to incompleteness may lead to misunderstandings among different jurisdictions over when a request is actually approved, causing administrative inefficiencies or legal challenges.
The mandate in Section 2 that State and local governments must provide timely and detailed written notices could impose significant administrative burdens and lead to disputes over interpretations of what constitutes necessary information.
The enforcement mechanism in Section 2 that allows expedited review by district courts could result in increased litigation and strain on judicial resources, suggesting a need for clearer limits or guidelines to avoid overwhelming the court system.
The reliance on technical terms and federal regulations to define key concepts in Section 2 might create confusion or misinterpretation for entities not well-versed in telecommunications regulations, impacting the effectiveness of the bill's implementation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act establishes its short title, stating that the Act may be called the “Broadband Resiliency and Flexible Investment Act.”
2. Requests for modification of certain existing wireless and telecommunications service facilities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 to require state and local governments to approve certain modifications to existing wireless and telecommunications facilities quickly. If they don't make a decision within 60 days, the request is automatically approved, with rules about how the timeline can be paused and the types of required information limited to what's necessary.