Overview
Title
To amend title 23, United States Code, to establish a safety data collection program for certain 6-axle vehicles, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill H. R. 3372 is about making bigger trucks with six wheels safer, by checking how often they crash and how far they drive, and by giving rewards if they have special brakes. This plan is like a big test for five years, where some states can allow these trucks on highways without losing any money for roads.
Summary AI
H. R. 3372 aims to amend title 23 of the United States Code to create a program for collecting safety data on certain trucks with six axles. This bill proposes a pilot program allowing states to issue permits for these vehicles on the interstate, requiring data collection on accidents, vehicle weight, and miles traveled. The program includes incentives for using trucks with automatic emergency braking systems. It also ensures that no reduction in highway funding occurs for states participating in the pilot program, which is set to last five years with possible extension.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, H.R. 3372, seeks to amend title 23 of the United States Code by establishing a pilot safety data collection program specifically for certain six-axle vehicles operating on the Interstate System. This legislative initiative highlights the need to gather reliable safety data regarding these types of vehicles, which are commonly used in freight and transport industries, to better understand and potentially improve transportation safety standards.
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 3372 introduces a pilot program that permits six-axle vehicles to operate on certain interstate routes in participating states. To include these vehicles in the program, states must submit an application and agree to issue permits for the eligible vehicles. These permits require detailed reporting of accidents and vehicle specifics, and states must submit annual reports on this data to the Secretary of Transportation. Notably, the bill includes a provision for a 67% reduction in permit fees for vehicles equipped with automatic emergency braking systems, thereby incentivizing the adoption of enhanced safety features.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues emerge from the proposed bill. One concern is the substantial fee reduction for vehicles equipped with automatic emergency braking systems, which could lead to notable revenue losses for states without a clear plan to address this shortfall. Additionally, the complexity of language surrounding vehicle weight limits and enforcement tolerances could lead to misunderstandings or complications in implementation. The criteria for extending the pilot program are not specifically outlined, potentially allowing for bias or lack of accountability in decision-making. Furthermore, the bill’s definition of the eligible safety systems is ambiguous, which could cause inconsistencies as technology evolves. Lastly, the administrative burden associated with data collection and reporting might outweigh the perceived benefits if the goals are not clearly articulated.
Impact on the Public
If enacted, the bill could have a notable impact on the general public, especially those who utilize the Interstate System for travel or rely on it for goods and services. Gathering safety data could lead to enhanced safety regulations, reducing the risk of accidents involving large transport vehicles and improving overall road safety. Additionally, by incentivizing safety technology, the bill encourages trucking companies to invest in newer, safer vehicles, potentially reducing the frequency and severity of traffic incidents.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For transportation companies and drivers, the bill presents both opportunities and challenges. On the positive side, the potential reduction in permit fees could significantly decrease operational costs for those employing modern safety technology. However, the complexity of compliance and reporting might impose additional administrative burdens. For state governments, the bill could present fiscal challenges due to the fee reduction, requiring strategies to compensate for revenue losses. On the other hand, the opportunity to enhance transportation safety and infrastructure could align with broader public safety objectives. Environmental stakeholders might view the encouragement of advanced braking systems as a step towards greener and more sustainable transport solutions, provided such technologies are efficiently integrated.
This legislative proposal is positioned as a step towards collecting valuable safety data for six-axle vehicles, offering potential gains in road safety, yet highlighted by notable challenges that require careful consideration from all involved stakeholders.
Issues
The provision in Section 1 that allows for a 67% fee reduction for vehicles equipped with an automatic emergency braking system might lead to significant revenue shortfalls for the states, raising concerns about how this shortfall will be addressed or its impact assessed.
The language in Section 1 describing weight limits and enforcement tolerances is complex, potentially causing confusion and implementation challenges without clear guidance or examples, particularly concerning the definitions of axle weight limits.
The pilot program's potential extension clause in Section 1 lacks specific criteria or detailed transparency measures, raising issues around decision-making fairness, potential favoritism, and accountability in continuing the program.
The term 'such systems in use on the date of enactment of this subsection' in Section 1, which determines eligibility for fee reduction, is ambiguous and may lead to inconsistencies in qualification standards as technology evolves.
The requirements for states and permit holders to report accidents and weights in Section 1 indicate significant administrative burdens without clear insight into the data's impact on improving safety, raising concerns about efficiency and purpose.
Section 1 lacks clarity on the consequences or actions for a state's non-compliance with the provisions, resulting in enforcement ambiguity.
Although Section 1 references 'enforcement tolerances,' there is no clear mention of how to handle situations where state-weighted vehicles exceed limits due to anomalies, which could result in potential legal conflicts or enforcement challenges.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Safety data collection program for certain 6-axle vehicles Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a pilot program that allows certain six-axle vehicles to operate on the Interstate System in participating states. States can join the program by submitting an application, must issue permits for these vehicles, and are required to report annually on accidents and vehicle data; a discount on permit fees is offered if vehicles have automatic emergency braking systems.