Overview
Title
To provide for the appointment of the Architect of the Capitol, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 3196 is a plan for picking the person who helps take care of big buildings where the government works, like a boss for those buildings. It's like choosing the best person for the job and making sure there’s someone ready to help them if they can’t work.
Summary AI
H.R. 3196, known as the "Architect of the Capitol Appointment Act of 2023," outlines how the Architect of the Capitol will be appointed in the United States. The Architect will be chosen based on their qualifications by a congressional commission, and they will serve for a term of 10 years, with the possibility of reappointment. The bill also includes provisions for appointing a Deputy Architect, and details what happens in case of a vacancy or if either the Architect or Deputy Architect is unable to perform their duties. Additionally, it makes some changes to previous laws about these roles.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled the "Architect of the Capitol Appointment Act of 2023," aims to establish the process for appointing the Architect of the Capitol, a key administrative position responsible for maintaining the U.S. Capitol complex. The bill outlines a system where a congressional commission selects the Architect for a ten-year term, with the possibility of reappointment. It details how the commission can remove the Architect from office and provides for appointing a Deputy Architect to serve as acting Architect as needed.
Significant Issues
A notable issue with this bill is the complexity and size of the commission involved in appointing the Architect. With numerous members, this commission might hinder swift decision-making, especially in urgent situations requiring immediate leadership decisions. Additionally, the bill lacks specific criteria for appointing either the Architect or Deputy Architect, raising concerns about appointments based on merit.
The provision for potentially unlimited reappointment terms could limit fresh ideas and innovations within the role. Moreover, the removal process outlined does not clarify the criteria or justifications for such an action, which might lead to arbitrary or politically motivated removals. The bill’s references to other legislative acts without adequate explanation may also impede understanding for those not thoroughly versed in legislative history.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill primarily affects the operations and maintenance of the U.S. Capitol, impacting those who work there or visit. The effectiveness of the Architect can significantly influence public safety, access, and the overall experience of the Capitol complex. Citizens will rely on the Architect's ability to oversee essential facilities, which requires competent leadership and a balanced approach to administration.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The most immediate stakeholders are those employed by or interacting with the Office of the Architect of the Capitol. Employees' work environment could be directly affected by the leadership and management style of the Architect, thus impacting productivity and job satisfaction.
Members of Congress and their staff, who work within the facilities maintained by the Architect, would be affected by any changes in how these environments are managed or modified. Furthermore, legislators might face the challenge of navigating the politics within the commission, potentially delaying critical decisions or reforms.
Entities involved in architectural conservation, construction, and historical preservation should also be interested in this bill, given its influence on leadership overseeing landmark structures. The lack of stipulated criteria for leadership selection could galvanize these groups to advocate for reforms ensuring candidates with suitable competencies are considered.
In summary, while the bill seeks a structured approach to this significant appointment, it raises concerns about decision efficiency and transparency, impacting both the legislative process and all Capitol stakeholders.
Issues
The procedure for appointing the Architect of the Capitol involves a large congressional commission, which might complicate or slow down the decision-making process, as noted in Section 2. This could become a significant issue if there are urgent needs for leadership or decision-making within the Office of the Architect of the Capitol.
The text does not specify the qualifications or criteria required for appointing the Architect or Deputy Architect, as highlighted in Sections 2 and 3. Without clear criteria, appointments could be made based on criteria other than merit, potentially affecting the quality and effectiveness of leadership.
The provision allowing for the reappointment of the Architect for additional 10-year terms in Section 2 could potentially stifle fresh perspectives in the role, leading to stagnation and resistance to new ideas.
The removal process detailed in Section 2 lacks specifics regarding what constitutes just cause for removal. This absence of detail could result in arbitrary decisions, impacting the stability and integrity of the Office of the Architect.
Subsection (d) of Section 3 introduces a backup plan for appointment by a congressional commission if the Architect does not appoint a Deputy Architect on time, but it lacks details on commission formation. This could lead to operational delays and ambiguity about authority during transitions.
The legislation references several other acts without detailed explanations (Sections 2 and 4), potentially causing confusion for readers unfamiliar with those acts and limiting the transparency of the legislative changes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short Title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that this law is officially called the "Architect of the Capitol Appointment Act of 2023".
2. Appointment and term of service of Architect of the Capitol Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the process for appointing the Architect of the Capitol, stating that the Architect is chosen by a majority vote from a specific congressional commission for a 10-year term, with the option for reappointment. It also allows the commission to remove the Architect at any time and repeals certain outdated provisions related to the appointment process.
3. Appointment of Deputy Architect of the Capitol; vacancy in Architect or Deputy Architect Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the rules for appointing a Deputy Architect of the Capitol. The Architect must appoint a Deputy within 120 days of their own appointment or when the position of Deputy becomes vacant, failing which a congressional commission will appoint one. Additionally, if the Deputy position becomes vacant, the Architect must inform the commission immediately.
4. Deputy Architect of the Capitol to serve as acting in case of absence, disability, or vacancy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Deputy Architect of the Capitol will temporarily take over the duties of the Architect of the Capitol if the current Architect is absent, disabled, or if the position is vacant. If both the Architect and the Deputy Architect are unavailable, a congressional commission will choose someone to fill in until either they return or a new Architect is appointed. This stand-in has full authority to carry out the duties of the Architect.