Overview

Title

To designate United States Route 20 in the States of Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Nebraska, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Massachusetts as the National Medal of Honor Highway, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

This bill is about giving a special name, "National Medal of Honor Highway," to a long road called Route 20 that goes through many states in America. It's like giving the road a big, important name to honor brave heroes who have won the Medal of Honor, which is a very special award.

Summary AI

H. R. 3149 proposes to designate United States Route 20, which runs through Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Nebraska, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Massachusetts, as the "National Medal of Honor Highway." The purpose of this designation is to honor all current and future recipients of the Medal of Honor and to recognize their valor and service. Any references in U.S. laws or documents to this highway will now refer to it by its new name.

Published

2024-11-26
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-11-26
Package ID: BILLS-118hr3149rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
541
Pages:
4
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 209
Verbs: 19
Adjectives: 8
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 24
Entities: 97

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.81
Average Sentence Length:
67.62
Token Entropy:
4.37
Readability (ARI):
33.39

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The legislation aims to designate the United States Route 20, which runs through the states of Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Nebraska, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Massachusetts, as the "National Medal of Honor Highway." This designation is intended to honor both current and future recipients of the Medal of Honor and to recognize their valor and service. It mandates that all references to this highway in various official documents and maps should reflect the new name.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill, while straightforward in its purpose, poses several notable issues. Firstly, there is no mention of the potential costs associated with this redesignation across multiple states. These costs could be significant, involving changes to road signage, maps, and documents. Additionally, the bill does not elucidate how these expenses might affect federal, state, or local budgets, raising concerns about potential wasteful spending.

Another issue is the absence of consultations with veterans' groups or their involvement in the proposal's formulation, which could raise ethical questions about inclusivity and stakeholder engagement. Furthermore, the language of the bill lacks specificity on the exact changes required, such as alterations to maps and signs, making the implementation details somewhat unclear.

Impact on the Public

The general public might perceive the designation of Route 20 as the "National Medal of Honor Highway" as a commendable tribute to Medal of Honor recipients. It highlights a national appreciation for their bravery and sacrifices. However, the public might also be concerned about the financial implications of this change, particularly if the costs are absorbed by taxpayer money. The overall impact might vary depending on how effectively these concerns are communicated and managed by the responsible authorities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Medal of Honor recipients and their families, this highway designation could serve as a meaningful recognition of their contributions and sacrifices. It places a symbolic honor on a substantial geographic expanse, potentially increasing awareness and respect for their exploits.

State and local governments, tasked with implementing the changes, might face financial and logistical burdens, particularly if the funding mechanisms and responsibilities are not clearly defined in the bill. Moreover, veterans' organizations might feel excluded due to the apparent lack of consultation, which might have otherwise strengthened the bill's reception and support within these communities.

In conclusion, while the bill aims to pay homage to national heroes, it presents challenges that need addressing to ensure its positive reception and minimize potential financial and logistical issues.

Issues

  • The bill does not address the potential costs associated with the designation of United States Route 20 as the 'National Medal of Honor Highway' across multiple states. This could have significant financial implications, particularly concerning the funding of new signage and other associated changes. [Section 1]

  • There is a lack of information on how this designation might impact federal, state, or local budgets, which could lead to concerns about wasteful spending and accountability. [Section 1]

  • The scope of the bill is limited to the designation of a highway and does not favor any particular organization or individual; however, the absence of consultation with organizations, such as veterans' groups, raises ethical concerns about stakeholder involvement and support for the proposal. [Section 1]

  • The language of the bill could benefit from further specification on what the designation entails, particularly in terms of changes to maps, signs, and documentation. This clarity is important for ensuring all parties understand the practical implications of the designation. [Section 1]

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. National Medal of Honor Highway Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that United States Route 20 in several states will be named the "National Medal of Honor Highway" to honor past, present, and future Medal of Honor recipients. It also states that any mention of this highway in official documents will recognize this designation.