Overview

Title

To prohibit the use of biometric recognition technology in certain federally assisted dwelling units, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 3060 is a bill that wants to stop using special technology that can recognize people's faces or bodies in some homes that get help from the government, and it also asks for a report about how this technology has been used before and how it affects people's privacy.

Summary AI

H. R. 3060 is a bill aimed at prohibiting the use of biometric recognition technology in certain federally assisted rental housing units. The legislation defines different types of biometric technologies and sets a one-year timeline after enactment for compliance. It also requires the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to report to Congress about any past uses of this technology in such housing and to assess its impact on residents and communities, emphasizing effects on tenant privacy and civil rights.

Published

2025-04-29
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-04-29
Package ID: BILLS-119hr3060ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
1,210
Pages:
7
Sentences:
18

Language

Nouns: 406
Verbs: 79
Adjectives: 103
Adverbs: 17
Numbers: 55
Entities: 88

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.56
Average Sentence Length:
67.22
Token Entropy:
5.02
Readability (ARI):
37.22

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 3060, known as the “No Biometric Barriers to Housing Act of 2025,” seeks to prohibit the use of biometric recognition technology in certain federally assisted rental dwelling units. Proposed by Ms. Clarke of New York, along with Ms. Pressley and Ms. Tlaib, the bill highlights a growing concern over privacy and discrimination issues linked to biometric technologies such as facial recognition. The primary aim is to ensure that tenants in federally assisted housing do not face adverse impacts on their ability to access affordable housing due to surveillance technologies.

The bill outlines a timeline and defines key terms including “facial recognition technology,” “physical biometric recognition technology,” and “remote biometric recognition technology.” It mandates the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to report to Congress on the current and past use of these technologies in federally assisted housing, assessing their impacts on residents.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the central issues with this bill is its potential impact on security measures within federally assisted housing units. While the prohibition intends to protect tenant rights and privacy, it omits providing alternative measures to ensure the safety of residents. Additionally, the broad definition of terms such as “remote biometric recognition technology” might lead to varying interpretations and legal challenges.

Another significant concern is the subjective nature of terms like “adverse effect on the ability of a tenant to fairly access affordable housing,” which could result in disputes over compliance. This vagueness might also complicate enforcement, as there are no specified mechanisms or costs laid out for this purpose.

Finally, the requirement for a comprehensive report to Congress introduces further complications. The responsibilities and potential costs associated with gathering detailed demographic and usage data could strain resources and raise privacy concerns. The bill does not provide specific measures to ensure accountability if the reporting requirements are not met or are inadequately handled.

Impact on Public and Specific Stakeholders

The bill has the potential to broadly impact the public by setting a precedent regarding privacy rights and technological surveillance in housing. By curbing the use of biometric technologies, there is a positive aspect of safeguarding civil liberties and ensuring that technological advances do not come at the expense of personal freedoms.

For residents of federally assisted housing, the bill could have both positive and negative effects. On the positive side, it prioritizes tenant privacy and protection from potential discrimination. On the negative side, the absence of biometric technology might pose challenges in maintaining security, possibly leaving vulnerable communities exposed if no alternatives are implemented.

For property owners and managers of federally assisted housing, this legislation requires them to alter existing security protocols possibly and ensure compliance with new standards without explicit guidance on how to achieve this. This shift could involve significant adaptation costs and create uncertainty about enforcement practices.

Public agencies tasked with implementing this legislation might face operational and financial burdens in monitoring compliance and producing the required reports. These tasks will necessitate careful management of resources and increased transparency to address any privacy concerns associated with collecting sensitive data.

Conclusion

While H.R. 3060 addresses valid concerns about the use of biometric technology and aims to protect tenant rights, it also presents several challenges that require resolution. These include defining clear enforcement strategies, compensating for lost security measures, and ensuring that the collection of data does not infringe on resident privacy. Achieving a balance between technological advancement and safeguarding individual rights remains a delicate but essential task.

Issues

  • The prohibition on the use of biometric identification technology (Section 2) could impact security measures in federally assisted housing without providing alternatives, potentially affecting the safety of residents.

  • The definition of 'remote biometric recognition technology' in Section 2 is vague, especially with the phrase 'or other immutable characteristic ascertained from a distance,' which could potentially encompass a wide array of technologies.

  • The term 'adverse effect on the ability of a tenant to fairly access affordable housing' used in Section 2 is subjective and might lead to varying interpretations or legal challenges.

  • Section 2's failure to address potential costs or mechanisms for enforcing the prohibition on biometric technologies or how compliance will be verified may lead to implementation challenges.

  • The section on the report to Congress (Section 3) does not specify any budget or costs associated with creating and submitting the report, which could result in unanticipated government spending.

  • The collection and provision of demographic information as required in Section 3 could raise privacy concerns for residents involved.

  • The timeline of 'not later than 1 year' for submitting the report in Section 3 may be too long or too short depending on the complexity and scope of data collection required, impacting the usefulness of findings.

  • Section 3 does not clearly outline accountability or consequences if the Secretary fails to submit the report on time or if it is inadequately detailed, potentially resulting in a lack of responsibility.

  • The phrase 'covered federally assisted rental dwelling unit' in Section 2 includes a broad range of programs, complicating the identification of specific properties affected without detailed information from each program mentioned.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act states that it can be officially called the “No Biometric Barriers to Housing Act of 2025”.

2. Prohibition on biometric identification technology Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section prohibits owners of certain federally assisted rental housing from using biometric identification technologies, such as facial recognition, within a year of the bill's enactment. It includes definitions of what constitutes a "covered federally assisted rental dwelling unit" and different types of biometric technologies.

3. Report to Congress Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development must submit a public report to Congress within one year of the Act's enactment, detailing the use of facial and biometric recognition technology in federally assisted housing units over the past five years. The report will cover the effects on tenants, reasons for implementing the technology, resident demographics, and potential impacts on vulnerable communities, including privacy and civil rights concerns.