Overview
Title
To amend parts B and E of title IV of the Social Security Act to improve foster and adoptive parent recruitment and retention, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 3058 is a plan to help find more families for kids who need them by asking each state to come up with a special plan to match kids better with families and make sure these families stay around to help. States will need to work with people in the community and share how well they're doing each year.
Summary AI
H. R. 3058 aims to improve how states recruit and retain foster and adoptive parents. It requires states to create a "Family Partnership Plan" by working with key stakeholders, such as families and community service providers. The bill focuses on utilizing data to better match children with families, improve stability and permanency, and address challenges in the recruitment process, particularly for families that reflect the racial and ethnic backgrounds of children in foster care. Additionally, it mandates annual state reports on family capacity, unutilized placements, and the challenges faced in recruiting and retaining foster and adoptive families.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled the "Recruiting Families Using Data Act of 2023," seeks to amend parts of the Social Security Act to bolster the recruitment and retention of foster and adoptive parents. It mandates the development of a "family partnership plan" by each state, a comprehensive strategy crafted in collaboration with various stakeholders such as families, service providers, and youth involved in the foster system. These plans aim to identify and engage potential foster and adoptive families, improve placement stability, and address special population needs. In addition, the bill requires an annual report to Congress with detailed data on the demographics and utilization of foster families, starting in the fiscal year 2025.
Significant Issues
A notable concern is the absence of a specific budget allocation for states to develop and implement these family partnership plans. Without designated funding, states could struggle to execute these requirements uniformly, potentially leading to varying levels of success depending on the state's existing resources. Additionally, there is a lack of clear mechanisms to evaluate the effectiveness of these plans, which could result in inconsistent practices and insufficient accountability.
Another issue arises from the broad language regarding data collection on foster families. The lack of specificity could lead to inconsistent reporting from state to state, making comparative analysis and policy decisions challenging. Moreover, the section allowing states to delay compliance if state legislation is needed does not include a strict deadline, which could cause significant implementation delays.
In Section 3, the bill requires detailed data collection and annual reporting to Congress. This task could impose substantial administrative costs on states, especially without clear guidance on how this data will be used to enhance foster and adoptive family recruitment and retention.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill aims at improving the foster care system, which could enhance outcomes for children in need of foster or adoptive families. By implementing targeted recruitment and retention strategies and addressing specific demographics' needs, the bill could strengthen the foster care system, leading to better care and stability for children. However, without proper funding and consistent practices across states, the potential benefits may not be fully realized.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Foster and Adoptive Families: The bill is intended to benefit current and prospective foster and adoptive families by creating more supportive and well-structured recruitment and retention programs. However, if states struggle with implementation due to financial constraints or other barriers, these families might not experience the intended improvements.
State Governments: States face the challenge of developing and implementing comprehensive family partnership plans without a specific budget. The administrative burden of collecting the required data for both internal use and Congressional reporting could also strain state resources.
Community-Based Organizations: These organizations may play a key role in the development of the family partnership plans. However, the lack of clear guidelines could foster favoritism or bias, affecting genuine community engagement and the effectiveness of the plans.
Children in Foster Care: Children stand to benefit significantly from an improved foster care system that prioritizes stable and suitable placements. The bill's emphasis on increasing placement stability and aligning families with children's needs directly addresses the welfare of these vulnerable individuals. However, delayed or ineffective implementation may hinder these potential improvements.
Overall, while the bill presents a structured approach to improve the foster care system, careful attention to addressing the identified issues and ensuring comprehensive support for implementation is crucial to achieving its goals.
Issues
The amendment in Section 2 does not specify a budget for states to implement the new family partnership plans, which could result in difficulties for states to effectively execute the plans without designated funding, potentially leading to disparities in implementation across states.
Section 2 raises concerns over potential favoritism or bias in the involvement of community-based service providers and other stakeholders in the consultation process for the family partnership plan, as there are no guidelines to prevent such biases.
Section 2 lacks a clear mechanism to evaluate the effectiveness of the family partnership plans, which may result in inefficiencies and lack of accountability in achieving the bill's objectives.
The broad language used in Section 2 regarding data collection on foster families could lead to inconsistent reporting across states, adversely impacting policy decisions and comparative analyses.
The amendment in Section 3 requires the collection and reporting of detailed State-by-State data, which could lead to significant administrative costs without clear guidance on how this data will be utilized to improve recruitment and retention of foster and adoptive families.
The effective date and compliance provisions in Section 2 allow for potentially significant delays in implementation if state legislation is required, without imposing a firm deadline for compliance.
In Section 3, the amendment does not define how 'challenges and barriers' are to be measured or who is responsible for these assessments, leading to possible inconsistencies in reporting across states.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act specifies that it can be referred to as the "Recruiting Families Using Data Act of 2023."
2. State plan amendment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes changes to the Social Security Act requiring states to create and implement a "family partnership plan" to enhance foster and adoptive family recruitment and retention. These plans must involve community input, use data to improve placements, and report annually on foster care capacities and challenges, with a compliance start date of October 1, 2024, unless state legislation requires more time.
3. Inclusion of information on foster and adoptive families in annual child welfare outcomes report to Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Social Security Act requires that a report is submitted annually to Congress starting in fiscal year 2025, which includes detailed State-by-State information on foster and adoptive families. This report should cover the number and demographics of these families, reasons potential families are not used, challenges to becoming or remaining a foster or adoptive parent, and difficulties in recruiting families that reflect the racial and ethnic backgrounds of children in foster care.