Overview
Title
An Act To amend parts B and E of title IV of the Social Security Act to improve foster and adoptive parent recruitment and retention, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 3058 is a new rule that wants to help find more families to take care of children who need a home. It asks each state to make a plan with help from people who know about foster care and to tell everyone how they are doing every year.
Summary AI
H.R. 3058, also known as the “Recruiting Families Using Data Act of 2023,” aims to improve the recruitment and retention of foster and adoptive families by amending parts of the Social Security Act. It requires states to create a detailed family partnership plan involving various stakeholders, including families and youth with foster care experience, to better recruit and support foster and adoptive families. States must also report on their progress annually, providing data on foster family capacity and challenges encountered in recruiting families that reflect the racial and ethnic backgrounds of children in foster care. Additionally, the bill mandates the inclusion of state-specific information on foster and adoptive families in an annual report to Congress starting in the fiscal year 2025.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The "Recruiting Families Using Data Act of 2023," designated as H.R. 3058, aims to amend parts of the Social Security Act to enhance the recruitment and retention of foster and adoptive parents. The bill seeks to establish "family partnership plans" at the state level, which involves gathering data and consulting various stakeholders to better align foster care resources with the needs of children. The legislation mandates annual reporting of foster care capacity, challenges, and recruitment efforts, with a focus on improving placement stability and increasing kinship placements. It also calls for a comprehensive report to Congress, detailing the characteristics and utilization of foster and adoptive families.
Significant Issues
Several issues emerge from the proposed amendments. One major concern is the complexity of the requirements for developing the family partnership plans, which may lead to inconsistent interpretation and execution by states. Additionally, while states are tasked with collecting detailed data, the bill does not clearly articulate how this information will be used to drive improvements or ensure accountability.
Furthermore, there is no mention of an allocated budget to help states implement these measures, potentially imposing financial strain on state resources. The bill also lacks a firm deadline for compliance if state legislation is necessary, which could delay implementation. Additionally, there are risks of unintended favoritism or bias during the consultation process for plan development, as guidelines to prevent this are absent. Another ambiguity lies in the definition of "potential foster and adoptive families not being utilized," which may lead to inconsistencies in data reporting.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill aims to improve the foster care system, which could have long-term benefits for children in need of stable and supportive home environments. By focusing on recruitment and retention, it seeks to address issues such as placement stability and family alignment with children's needs.
However, the complexity and potential financial burden on states may slow down progress. If poorly implemented, the intended improvements may not be realized, thus maintaining the status quo or even exacerbating existing issues within the foster care system.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For children in foster care, particularly those in need of permanent homes, the bill presents an opportunity for better matching with suitable families, thus potentially enhancing their well-being and future prospects. Foster and adoptive families could benefit from improved support and resources, which could encourage more individuals to participate in the system.
On the other hand, state agencies may face challenges in meeting the new requirements without adequate resources, potentially affecting their ability to implement these changes effectively. Community-based service providers are invited to play a role in developing these plans, which could be positive but also raises concerns regarding potential bias if their involvement is not carefully monitored.
Overall, while the bill sets forth ambitious goals to improve foster care through data-driven strategies, its success will largely depend on the implementation process and the resources allocated to support these new initiatives.
Issues
The State plan amendment (Section 2) introduces complex requirements for developing and implementing a family partnership plan. This complexity could lead to challenges in interpretation and execution by states, resulting in inconsistent implementation across different regions, which could significantly impact foster care operations.
The amendment in Section 2 requires states to collect and report detailed data on foster family capacity and utilization, but it does not specify how this information will be used to drive improvements or ensure accountability. This lack of clarity might result in inefficiencies and potential misuse of the collected data.
In Section 2, the bill outlines specific requirements for a family partnership plan without mentioning any allocated budget to support states in meeting these new measures. This absence could place a financial burden on states, potentially compromising the effectiveness of the planned improvements.
Section 3 requires collecting and reporting State-by-State data, which could lead to significant administrative costs and logistical challenges for state agencies without a clear understanding of how this data will drive improvements in foster and adoptive systems.
The bill does not prescribe a deadline for compliance in Section 2 if state legislation is required, which could lead to substantial delays in the implementation of necessary improvements to foster care systems.
In Section 2, there is a risk of unintended favoritism or bias if certain community-based service providers are heavily involved in plan development consultations, as no checks or guidelines prevent this, potentially disadvantaging some groups.
In Section 3, the criteria for determining 'potential foster and adoptive families not being utilized' are not clearly defined, leading to possible ambiguities and inconsistencies in data reporting across states.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act specifies that it can be referred to as the "Recruiting Families Using Data Act of 2023."
2. State plan amendment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes changes to the Social Security Act requiring states to create and implement a "family partnership plan" to enhance foster and adoptive family recruitment and retention. These plans must involve community input, use data to improve placements, and report annually on foster care capacities and challenges, with a compliance start date of October 1, 2024, unless state legislation requires more time.
3. Inclusion of information on foster and adoptive families in annual child welfare outcomes report to Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Social Security Act requires that a report is submitted annually to Congress starting in fiscal year 2025, which includes detailed State-by-State information on foster and adoptive families. This report should cover the number and demographics of these families, reasons potential families are not used, challenges to becoming or remaining a foster or adoptive parent, and difficulties in recruiting families that reflect the racial and ethnic backgrounds of children in foster care.