Overview

Title

An Act To repeal the sunset provision of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 3033 is a bill that tries to keep rules for punishing Iran going forever, so that any bad actions won't be forgotten. It lets these rules stay active instead of ending someday, to make sure people follow them even if things change later on.

Summary AI

H.R. 3033 aims to eliminate the expiration date (or "sunset provision") of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, ensuring that the sanctions against Iran continue indefinitely. The bill highlights that Iran has been acquiring weapons from countries like Russia and supporting terrorist activities. It expresses the U.S. policy to fully enforce the sanctions outlined in the 1996 Act. The bill passed the House of Representatives on April 16, 2024, and was received in the Senate.

Published

2024-04-17
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Referred in Senate
Date: 2024-04-17
Package ID: BILLS-118hr3033rfs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
352
Pages:
3
Sentences:
14

Language

Nouns: 114
Verbs: 21
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 29
Entities: 35

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.97
Average Sentence Length:
25.14
Token Entropy:
4.54
Readability (ARI):
13.01

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The legislative proposal titled the "Solidify Iran Sanctions Act of 2023" aims to extend the economic sanctions against Iran by repealing the sunset clause from the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996. This repeal would effectively allow the sanctions to remain in place indefinitely, without a predetermined expiration date. The bill emphasizes the United States' commitment to enforcing these sanctions to curb Iran's alleged funding for terrorism and missile development programs.

Significant Issues

Several critical issues arise from the proposed legislation:

  1. Removal of the Sunset Provision: By eliminating the sunset clause, there is a significant risk that the sanctions will continue indefinitely without re-evaluation. This lack of reevaluation could lead to a failure to adjust to the geopolitical landscape or advancements in diplomatic relations, which might render long-standing sanctions either ineffective or unnecessarily punitive.

  2. Ambiguity in the Legal Text: The repeal involves striking sections that were concerned with the effective date of the sanctions. Without replacing these provisions with alternative guidelines, there might be confusion over how the sanctions are to be administered in the future. This could lead regulators and companies affected by the sanctions to face uncertainty about compliance requirements.

  3. Lack of Specific Enforcement Details: The bill does not provide details on the mechanisms for implementing or updating the sanctions, nor does it address how the effectiveness of these sanctions will be assessed. This omission could lead to challenges in executing the sanctions effectively and adapting them as circumstances change.

Impact on the Public

The continuation of Iran sanctions can have a broad impact on various sectors. For the general public in the United States, the economic impact might be minimal, but there could be indirect consequences if strained relations result in alteration of international markets, especially those dealing with oil and gas. Interest rates and petroleum prices could be influenced by these market shifts.

Impact on Stakeholders

Various stakeholders might experience differing impacts based on the continuation of Iranian sanctions:

  • Diplomatic Community: Foreign policy experts and diplomats may view this bill as a reaffirmation of the U.S.’s hard stance against Iran. However, this move might exacerbate tensions between the U.S. and countries maintaining more conciliatory relations with Iran.

  • Business and Trade: U.S. businesses with ties to industries like oil, gas, or technology may find these sanctions a regulatory burden, complicating trade relationships and limiting market opportunities in regions with Iranian influence.

  • International Relations and Allies: Countries aligned with the U.S. stance might consider this legislative direction as strengthening collective security. Conversely, nations seeking to improve relations with Iran could see this as an obstacle, potentially straining alliances or partnerships.

In summary, while the "Solidify Iran Sanctions Act of 2023" proposes to maintain a firm position against Iran by removing the expiration date for sanctions, it raises significant concerns regarding clarity and adaptability of U.S. policy in response to the evolving international context.

Issues

  • Section 4 involves the repeal of a sunset provision, potentially resulting in extended enforcement of sanctions without future expiration. This could lead to continued sanctions without the necessity for reevaluation or renewal, potentially failing to account for shifts in political or economic contexts.

  • By striking the subsections labeled 'Effective date' and another subsection in Section 4, there is a risk of creating ambiguity regarding the timeline of enforceability and other critical procedural details without providing clear replacements or explanations.

  • The text of Section 4 strikes certain provisions without additional context or replacement, which may lead to a lack of clarity on how the Act is to be implemented or administered, possibly causing confusion in legal and regulatory compliance.

  • Section 2 raises concerns as it does not offer specific details on how the sanctions are to be implemented or enforced, leading to potential ambiguities in execution.

  • The findings in Section 2 do not include measures to assess the effectiveness of the sanctions or mechanisms to modify them based on changing circumstances.

  • In Section 2, the text refers to multiple sources of destabilizing weapons ('Russian Federation and other malign actors') without specifying who these actors are, which might create ambiguities in interpretation.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that it can be referred to as the "Solidify Iran Sanctions Act of 2023".

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress finds that the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 mandates sanctions due to Iran's illegal weapons activities and terrorism support. Additionally, the Iranian government has obtained dangerous weapons from Russia and others, and is providing military and financial aid to terrorist groups in the Middle East, posing a threat to U.S. allies like Israel.

3. Statement of policy Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The policy of the United States is to fully carry out and enforce the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, a law designed to limit Iran's ability to fund terrorism and pursue weapons of mass destruction.

4. Repeal of sunset Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 4 of this bill removes certain parts of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996. It deletes the part that talked about when the act would start and eliminates a subsection that is no longer needed.