Overview
Title
An Act To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to Mesa County, Colorado, certain Federal land in Colorado, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 2997 is a plan for the government to sell a small piece of land in Mesa County, Colorado, to the county itself, making sure it pays a fair price and covers all the costs. The money from this sale will go to a special account for the government's future land sales.
Summary AI
H.R. 2997, also known as the “CONVEY Act,” proposes that the Secretary of the Interior should transfer ownership of about 31.1 acres of federal land in Mesa County, Colorado, to the county. The transfer should occur for at least the fair market value as determined by an independent appraisal. Mesa County will be responsible for covering all related costs, and the earnings from this transaction will go into the Federal Land Disposal Account. Any necessary corrections or discrepancies in the land description will be mutually resolved by the Secretary and the County.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The Clifton Opportunities Now for Vibrant Economic Yields Act, also known as the CONVEY Act, is a legislative bill that proposes the transfer of a specific piece of federal land, called the Clifton parcel, to Mesa County, Colorado. This parcel encompasses approximately 31.1 acres. The procedure for this conveyance involves meeting certain conditions, including determining the land's fair market value through an independent appraisal and ensuring the county assumes all associated conveyance costs. The revenue generated from this transaction will be directed to a Federal Land Disposal Account, as mandated by federal law.
Significant Issues
A prominent issue with the bill is the potential financial burden imposed on Mesa County, as it requires the county to cover all costs associated with the conveyance. This requirement could place a significant strain on the county’s finances, particularly if the costs are substantial.
Another concern pertains to the determination of fair market value, which relies solely on an independent appraisal. The lack of a formal mechanism for Mesa County to dispute or appeal the valuation in case of disagreement could potentially lead to an unfair transaction.
Additionally, the bill uses the phrase "as soon as practicable" to describe the timeline for completing the conveyance, a term that lacks specificity. This vagueness could result in prolonged delays, affecting the county’s development plans and timelines.
Furthermore, the bill prioritizes the use of the map over legal written descriptions in the event of discrepancies. Since maps generally offer less precision than legal descriptions, this can lead to ambiguities and legal challenges concerning land boundaries.
Lastly, the bill does not specify how the proceeds from the land conveyance, deposited into a Federal Land Disposal Account, would specifically benefit Mesa County. This lack of detail may raise concerns about the equitable allocation of funds derived from local land sales.
Broader Public Impact
The bill, if passed, could have varying impacts on the broader public. On one hand, transferring federal lands to local entities like Mesa County might encourage localized economic development, foster community projects, and boost regional autonomy in land use decisions. However, the financial burden on the county and the potential for prolonged disputes regarding land valuation and descriptions may hinder these developments. Public perception might also shift negatively if it is perceived that federal interests are being prioritized over local needs, particularly due to the financial responsibilities imposed on the county.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For Mesa County, the bill offers both opportunity and challenge. The transfer of land could provide valuable opportunities for the county to develop the parcel in ways that benefit local residents, potentially through new infrastructure, community services, or economic ventures. However, the costs involved in the conveyance—as well as the lack of recourse in questioning the appraisal—pose significant risks. If the appraisal suggests a higher valuation than the county anticipates, or if the conveyance costs are substantial, these financial burdens could hinder the county’s budget and its capacity to invest in other areas.
Federal and environmental agencies might view the bill as a way to streamline land management and potentially redirect resources towards other priorities. However, these transactions also draw attention to the need for clear, equitable processes in federal land conveyance, which are crucial to maintaining public trust.
In summary, while the CONVEY Act facilitates local control and potential economic growth through land transfer, it also raises multiple concerns regarding financial impacts, equitable valuation processes, and clear, accountable timelines. These concerns must be carefully balanced to ensure the bill achieves its intended benefits without unfairly disadvantaging local stakeholders.
Issues
The bill mandates that Mesa County is required to pay all costs related to the conveyance, which could impose a significant financial burden on the county. This requirement could be perceived as prioritizing federal financial interests over those of the County, potentially leading to local economic strain. (Section 2(e))
The determination of 'fair market value' is based on an independent appraisal without provisions for Mesa County to dispute or appeal the valuation. This could disadvantage the County if they disagree with the valuation, potentially leading to an inequitable transaction. (Section 2(d))
The phrase 'as soon as practicable' regarding the timeline for the conveyance of land is vague, offering no specific deadline. This vagueness could result in significant delays without accountability, negatively impacting Mesa County's planning and development strategies. (Section 2(b))
While the map titled 'Clifton Opportunities Now for Vibrant Economic Yields (CONVEY) Act' is used as a controlling document over legal descriptions in case of discrepancies, such maps generally lack the detailed precision of legal descriptions. This could lead to legal ambiguities and disputes over the exact boundaries and features of the land being conveyed. (Section 2(g))
The proceeds from the land conveyance are to be deposited into the Federal Land Disposal Account, without specifying how these funds will benefit Mesa County or its community directly. This lack of clarity could raise concerns about the equitable distribution and use of public funds generated from local land sales. (Section 2(f))
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be referred to as the "Clifton Opportunities Now for Vibrant Economic Yields Act" or simply the "CONVEY Act".
2. Conveyance of Federal land to Mesa County, Colorado Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the transfer of a 31.1-acre piece of federal land, known as the "Clifton parcel," to Mesa County, Colorado. To proceed, the fair market value must be determined through an independent appraisal, and Mesa County is responsible for all associated costs, with proceeds going into a Federal Land Disposal Account.