Overview
Title
An Act To establish an Independent Financial Technology Working Group to Combat Terrorism and Illicit Financing, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Financial Technology Protection Act of 2023 is all about making a special group of experts to help stop bad guys from using new digital money for illegal things, like funding terrorism. This group will work together and come up with smart ideas to make sure digital money is used safely.
Summary AI
H.R. 2969, known as the "Financial Technology Protection Act of 2023," aims to create an Independent Financial Technology Working Group to address terrorism and illicit financing. This group will include various government agencies and representatives from financial technology, blockchain intelligence, and research organizations. Its main tasks are to research and develop proposals to combat the misuse of new financial technologies like digital assets for illegal activities. The act also requires reports and strategies to prevent the use of digital assets for evading sanctions or financing terrorism.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The Financial Technology Protection Act of 2023, designated as H. R. 2969, aims to establish a dedicated working group designed to combat terrorism and illegal financial activities through improved oversight and innovation in financial technologies. This bill mandates the formation of the Independent Financial Technology Working Group, composed of representatives from key government agencies and private sector stakeholders. This group is tasked with researching the misuse of emerging financial technologies and developing legislative and regulatory proposals to prevent such abuses. Additionally, the bill requires the President to prepare and submit reports on how these technologies might be exploited to evade sanctions and finance terrorism, along with strategies to counteract these threats.
Summary of Significant Issues
A notable issue with the bill is the lack of specificity regarding the selection process for private sector representatives, which could lead to favoritism and ethical concerns. There is also ambiguity around the group's funding sources, raising concerns about potential unchecked spending. Furthermore, the timeline for the President's report submission may be too tight to ensure a comprehensive analysis. The bill's language in some areas is broad, especially concerning sources of information for reports, potentially affecting the reliability of the findings.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the bill represents both an opportunity and a risk. On the positive side, it could strengthen national security by mitigating the threat posed by the misuse of financial technologies in illegal activities, thus creating a safer environment. On the downside, there's a risk of taxpayer money being used inefficiently if spending by the Working Group is not effectively managed or if reports are based on unreliable sources. Furthermore, if the definitions and legislative proposals are not clear, it could lead to confusion and inefficiencies in how these technologies are regulated and monitored.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Financial technology companies and blockchain intelligence firms might find new opportunities to collaborate with the government, given their appointed roles within the working group. However, the ambiguity in appointment criteria can lead to concerns about unequal representation. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies could benefit from clearer mechanisms to tackle financial terrorism, strengthening their operational capacity. Conversely, these same agencies might experience challenges if the group lacks proper oversight or if the definitions set forth in the bill are too broad or vague, complicating enforcement efforts.
Institutions focused on privacy and civil liberties might view the bill with skepticism, concerned about potential overreach and impact on individual freedoms. The public release of parts of the report and the possible inclusion of biased sources might lead to misinformation if not handled transparently.
In conclusion, while the Financial Technology Protection Act of 2023 aims to address critical contemporary issues related to financial security and terrorism, it raises significant questions about implementation transparency, effectiveness, and clarity. Careful consideration and potentially further revisions are necessary to ensure that the legislation achieves its goals while maintaining fairness, accountability, and respect for civil liberties.
Issues
The lack of clearly defined criteria for appointing individuals from financial technology companies, blockchain intelligence companies, financial institutions, and other organizations in Section 2 can lead to favoritism and raise ethical concerns about the selection process.
The undefined budget or funding source for the Independent Financial Technology Working Group in Section 2 could result in unchecked or wasteful spending, posing financial risks to government resources.
The broad language in Section 3 regarding the sources of information for reports, allowing any 'credible publication, database, or web-based resource,' can potentially include biased sources, impacting the reliability and objectivity of the report.
The provision for a classified annex in Section 3 can limit transparency and public scrutiny of the actions and findings related to preventing rogue and foreign actors from evading sanctions.
The term 'digital asset' is defined in Section 4 using complex technological terminology that might not be universally understood, complicating its application and enforcement for both regulators and industry stakeholders.
There is no oversight or accountability mechanism described in Section 2 for the activities and spending of the Working Group, leading to potential transparency issues.
The vague term 'appropriate congressional committees' used in Sections 2 and 3 should specify which committees are meant to receive reports, to prevent any legal ambiguities related to reporting obligations.
The timeline of 180 days for report submission in Section 3 may be insufficient to create a comprehensive and multi-agency involved report, affecting the quality and thoroughness of the strategy developed.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the document states the name of the law, which is the "Financial Technology Protection Act of 2023."
2. Independent financial technology working group to combat terrorism and illicit financing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill establishes the Independent Financial Technology Working Group to Combat Terrorism and Illicit Financing, which is comprised of government and private sector representatives. Its main tasks are to research the use of new financial technologies in illegal activities and develop legislative and regulatory proposals to strengthen anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing efforts, with the group required to report their findings annually for four years.
3. Preventing rogue and foreign actors from evading sanctions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the President to submit a report to Congress within 180 days, detailing how digital assets and related technologies might be used by various actors to avoid sanctions, finance terrorism, or threaten U.S. national security, and to outline a strategy to prevent these risks. It also mandates that the report be publicly accessible in an easily downloadable format, and obligates the Secretary of the Treasury to brief Congress on the strategy's implementation within two years.
4. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill defines several key terms, including: appropriate congressional committees, detailing the relevant committees in both the Senate and the House of Representatives; blockchain intelligence company, referring to businesses that provide services related to cryptography-secured ledgers; and digital asset, which is any value recorded on such ledgers. It also clarifies the definitions of a foreign terrorist organization, illicit use, and a terrorist, linking these to existing legal frameworks.