Overview
Title
To require the Federal Trade Commission to issue regulations requiring certain products to have Do Not Flush labeling, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
In this bill, the government wants to make sure that certain wipes tell people not to flush them down the toilet, so they don't block the pipes. They want everyone to follow the same rules about these labels across the whole country.
Summary AI
H. R. 2964 requires the Federal Trade Commission to create rules mandating that certain products, specifically disposable wipes, display a “Do Not Flush” label. This regulation aims to inform consumers and prevent issues in wastewater systems caused by flushing wipes that are not designed to disintegrate like toilet paper. The bill outlines specific labeling requirements for different packaging types to ensure the label is clearly visible and enforceable by the Federal Trade Commission. Additionally, it preempts state laws by establishing a national standard for these labeling requirements.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled the “Wastewater Infrastructure Pollution Prevention and Environmental Safety Act” or the “WIPPES Act,” seeks to mandate clear and conspicuous "Do Not Flush" labeling on certain disposable wipes. These wipes are nonwoven, premoistened, and often marketed for personal and household use. The bill entrusts the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) with the authority to enforce these labeling requirements, aiming to discourage the practice of flushing such wipes, which can lead to plumbing and wastewater infrastructure issues. It preempts state laws that differ from this federal standard to ensure uniformity across the United States.
Summary of Significant Issues
A major issue with the bill is its reliance on external guidelines set by organizations like the Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry (INDA) and the European Disposables And Nonwovens Association (EDANA) for defining the "Do Not Flush" symbol. This reliance could lead to inconsistencies if these organizations update their standards.
The absence of clearly defined penalties for non-compliance presents another issue, creating uncertainty for enforcement. Manufacturers may face challenges in determining compliance due to vague language in the bill, such as what constitutes products having a "significant potential to be flushed." Additionally, the broad definition of "covered entity" could unnecessarily burden small retailers and individuals, imposing compliance costs they may struggle to meet.
Moreover, the bill's language concerning label visibility could be interpreted variably, leading to inconsistent application across manufacturers. Its preemption clause might provoke legal disputes by preventing states from enacting their specific labeling requirements, which could be viewed as federal overreach.
Impact on the Public
Overall, this bill aims to benefit the public by protecting wastewater infrastructure from the clogs and damages caused by flushing inappropriate materials. By making it clearer which products should not be flushed, individuals may become more informed about responsible waste disposal, potentially reducing plumbing repair costs for consumers and lowering maintenance demands on municipal waste systems.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Manufacturers and Retailers: For manufacturers, particularly those producing or selling personal and household wipes, the bill could introduce new packaging costs. Compliance with specific labeling requirements, like high visibility and contrast, might necessitate reprinting packaging, which could drive up prices—costs likely to be passed on to consumers.
Small Businesses and Individuals: The broad definition of "covered entities" might disproportionately affect small businesses and retailers unprepared for the administrative burden of compliance. These entities may face financial strain adapting to new requirements.
Regulatory Bodies: The FTC gains expanded responsibilities, which could require additional resources to develop and enforce the new regulations. Cooperation with other agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency might be necessary to ensure consistent messaging and implementation across various regulatory domains.
States: State governments could perceive the preemption of state laws as an infringement on their ability to address local environmental concerns. If local issues are not adequately covered by federal guidelines, states may feel their hands tied in enacting specific measures to protect their wastewater systems.
In summary, while the bill offers potential environmental benefits by addressing issues of improper wipe disposal, it introduces several interpretative and compliance challenges that stakeholders will need to navigate.
Issues
The bill's reliance on external standards set by INDA and EDANA for 'Do Not Flush' symbols in Section 2 may lead to inconsistencies or challenges in compliance if these organizations change their guidelines, affecting legal enforcement and manufacturer operations.
The absence of specific penalties for non-compliance in Section 2 creates uncertainty around enforcement, diminishing the effectiveness of the legislation and potentially involving legal disputes.
The definition of what products have a 'significant potential to be flushed' in Section 2 is subjective, possibly leading to varying interpretations and compliance challenges for manufacturers.
The preemption of State laws in Section 2(f) may cause legal disputes, as it prevents states from enacting their own requirements, which could be perceived as federal overreach and limit localized environmental protection efforts.
The vague requirement for labeling to be 'reasonably visible to the user each time a wipe is dispensed,' found in Section 2, could result in differing interpretations and inconsistent application across manufacturers.
The broad definition of 'covered entity' to include small retailers or individuals in Section 2 could impose burdensome compliance costs on smaller businesses, impacting their financial stability.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the official short title of the act, which is the “Wastewater Infrastructure Pollution Prevention and Environmental Safety Act”, abbreviated as the “WIPPES Act”.
2. Do not flush labeling Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires that certain disposable wipes sold in the U.S. must have a clear and noticeable "Do Not Flush" label and symbol on their packaging, according to specific rules depending on packaging type. It also prohibits any claims suggesting these products can be flushed and gives enforcement power to the Federal Trade Commission, making state laws about these labels invalid if they differ from this federal standard.