Overview
Title
To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 with respect to the dairy margin coverage program, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 294 is a bill that changes the way help for dairy farmers is calculated by looking at the most recent years instead of old ones, and it lets farmers cover more milk with insurance.
Summary AI
H.R. 294 is a bill introduced in the 119th Congress that aims to make changes to the dairy margin coverage program under the Agricultural Act of 2014. The proposed amendments include updating the production history to be based on the most recent three-year period, calculated every five years, instead of fixed years from 2011 to 2013. Additionally, the bill proposes increasing the coverage limits for both Tier I and Tier II premiums from 5,000,000 to 6,000,000 pounds of milk. This bill, introduced by Mr. Langworthy and others, seeks to better support and adapt to current conditions in the dairy industry.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The Dairy Farm Resiliency Act seeks to update and modify aspects of the Dairy Margin Coverage program originally established under the Agricultural Act of 2014. This congressional bill, H.R. 294, is poised to bring significant alterations in how dairy farmers interact financially with the program by making two primary changes related to production history and coverage limits.
General Summary
The proposed legislation primarily aims to revise parts of a federal support program that helps dairy farmers manage their financial exposure to market volatility. The bill specifies two major amendments: the first relates to how the history of milk production is calculated for the purposes of program eligibility, moving from static past years to a more dynamic recent three-year measure recalculated every five years. The second amendment increases the maximum coverage levels for both Tier I and Tier II premiums under the Dairy Margin Coverage program, enhancing coverage from 5,000,000 to 6,000,000 units.
Summary of Significant Issues
A key issue arising from this bill is the amendment to the calculation of production history. By shifting to a rolling, recent three-year history, this adjustment aims to better reflect current production capacities. However, this could significantly alter the eligibility and coverage for farmers, depending on their recent production trends, potentially leading to disruptions in financial planning.
Similarly, increasing the cap on coverage levels could impact farmers’ financial strategies. While this adjustment may provide larger safety nets against price swings, it could also affect the affordability of coverage, with disproportionate impacts on smaller versus larger farms due to differential financial capacities and scale of operations.
Broad Public Impact
From a broad perspective, these changes to dairy margin coverage are intended to make the program more flexible and adaptive to current agricultural realities. By aligning coverage with recent production data, the bill ensures that benefits are more reflective of a farmer's current situation rather than historic performance. This adjustment may promote fairness and allow farmers to make more informed, impactful business decisions based on their existing operations.
Stakeholder Impacts
For dairy farmers, especially smaller operators, the shift in production history calculation and increased coverage ceiling can have both positive and negative effects. On the positive side, these changes may align the program more closely with their actual economic conditions, potentially offering improved protection against market volatility. However, smaller farms might face new challenges regarding the increased financial obligations for higher premium ceilings, potentially straining their resources more than larger operations with more robust financial systems.
Conversely, larger farms, although better positioned to absorb additional premium costs, may benefit more broadly from the increased coverage limits, potentially widening the gap in competitive advantage against smaller-scale producers.
Overall, while the Dairy Farm Resiliency Act aims to improve resiliency within the industry, its impacts will depend significantly on how different stakeholders are able to adapt to the new provisions and leverage them within their operational contexts.
Issues
The amendment in Section 2(a) changes the calculation of production history from a specific set of past years (2011, 2012, or 2013) to the most recent three-year history, recalculated every five years. This could have significant implications for dairy farmers' eligibility and benefits under the program and may affect financial planning and stability across the industry.
In Section 2(b), the bill increases the Tier I and Tier II premium coverage limits from 5,000,000 to 6,000,000. This change might impact the financial obligations of dairy farmers and influence the affordability of coverage, potentially affecting smaller farmers differently than larger ones.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it is officially named the “Dairy Farm Resiliency Act.”
2. Dairy margin coverage program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Dairy Margin Coverage program in the Agricultural Act of 2014 is being modified in two main ways: first, it updates the method for determining production history to use a more recent three-year history instead of specific past years; second, it increases the coverage level from 5,000,000 to 6,000,000 for both Tier I and Tier II premiums in the program.