Overview

Title

To authorize support for Ukraine, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 2913, called the "Ukraine Support Act," is a plan by the U.S. to help Ukraine by providing money and support in their struggle, while also putting rules on Russia to stop them from being mean.

Summary AI

H.R. 2913, known as the "Ukraine Support Act," is a bill introduced to provide various forms of assistance and support to Ukraine amid its ongoing conflict with Russia. The bill includes provisions for diplomatic support, security assistance, sanctions against Russia, and export controls, aiming to bolster Ukraine's defense and reconstruction efforts. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of NATO and outlines strategies for countering Russian influence, particularly in the energy sector. The bill also establishes a trust fund for Ukraine's reconstruction and authorizes programs to counter Russian disinformation activities.

Published

2025-04-14
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-04-14
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2913ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
42
Words:
18,137
Pages:
91
Sentences:
491

Language

Nouns: 5,753
Verbs: 1,263
Adjectives: 1,081
Adverbs: 202
Numbers: 704
Entities: 1,612

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.52
Average Sentence Length:
36.94
Token Entropy:
5.80
Readability (ARI):
21.84

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

The "Ukraine Support Act" is a legislative proposal introduced to authorize and enhance the United States' support for Ukraine amid ongoing tensions with Russia. The bill outlines a wide array of measures, including diplomatic initiatives, security assistance, and imposition of sanctions on Russia and related entities. It seeks to affirm U.S. commitment to Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, while also reinforcing partnerships with NATO allies.

Significant Issues

Complex Language and Ambiguity

A significant concern about the bill is the complexity and density of the language used across multiple sections. This could make it difficult for the public to fully grasp the implications of the legislation. Sections such as Section 1 and Section 301 exemplify this challenge, as they contain dense legislative terms that hinder public comprehension. Such complex language could limit public engagement and understanding of the bill's impacts.

Funding and Budgetary Concerns

The bill proposes substantial financial commitments without clearly defined budgets or limits, raising concerns about potential misuse or wasteful spending. For instance, Section 108 allocates $250,000,000 to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty with little clarity on the cost-benefit analysis. Similarly, extending the Lend-Lease authority through Section 201 to 2028 raises questions about the long-term financial commitments without detailed oversight mechanisms.

Discretionary Powers and Transparency

Sections such as Section 105 grant discretionary power to the Secretary of State to provide war risk insurance, based on national security interests. This could lead to potential subjective decision-making and lack of transparency, creating uncertainty about how decisions are made and who benefits from the provisions. Similarly, the criteria for selecting Russian financial institutions for sanctions, as detailed in Section 302, are not clearly defined, leading to potential inconsistent applications.

Broad Impact on the Public

The bill's broad implications on diplomatic relations and financial commitments could have far-reaching effects on international trade, taxpayer spending, and U.S. foreign policy. The hefty allocations for military and security assistance might be perceived as necessary to support a strategic ally, yet without stringent oversight, they risk straining taxpayer resources. The proposed sanctions may impact global markets by affecting trade and commerce not only with Russia but potentially with allied nations connected through global supply chains.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Ukraine and European Allies

The bill is designed to provide significant support to Ukraine, which should bolster its resistance against Russian aggression. This support may empower Ukraine's military capabilities and facilitate reconstruction efforts, enhancing long-term stability and relationships within Europe. NATO allies will likely see this move as a reaffirmation of support, providing them with a sense of security and united opposition to perceived threats from adversarial forces.

Financial and Business Sectors

Businesses, particularly in the energy and financial sectors, may face uncertainties or disruptions from the proposed sanctions and increased tariffs on Russian imports. Section 314 mandates an increase in import duties to 500% on Russian goods, which may disrupt market dynamics and international trade relationships, potentially leading to legal challenges. Meanwhile, companies involved in compliance and export controls as highlighted in Sections 313 and 303, might experience increased regulatory burdens due to expanded export controls and sanctions, affecting their operational capacities.

The General Public

For the general public, the allocation of significant financial resources could raise concerns about fiscal accountability and prioritization of domestic needs. While support for Ukraine may align with broader democratic values, the potential for financial overreach without clear oversight could lead to a call for more stringent checks on government spending, especially given other domestic priorities that may also require funding.

In essence, while the "Ukraine Support Act" aims to solidify support for Ukraine against Russian aggression, questions around financial transparency, oversight, and resource allocation could significantly influence public perception and policy efficacy. Stakeholders should closely monitor how the bill's provisions are implemented to ensure alignment with broader strategic and economic goals.

Financial Assessment

Financial Allocations in the Ukraine Support Act

The "Ukraine Support Act," outlined in H.R. 2913, includes multiple provisions related to financial allocations and appropriations to support Ukraine during its ongoing conflict with Russia. Below is a breakdown of significant financial aspects present in the bill.

Significant Financial Appropriations and Spending

  1. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (Section 108): The bill authorizes an appropriation of $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2026 to support Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. This substantial budget allocation is intended to enhance the organization's capability to provide independent news and counter Russian disinformation. However, there is concern about the appropriateness and efficiency of this large sum of government spending. The allocation raises questions regarding the cost-benefit analysis necessary to justify such an investment, reflecting one of the identified issues regarding taxpayer spending.

  2. Support for Baltic Countries (Section 203): For each fiscal year from 2026 to 2028, the Secretary of State is authorized to allocate $30,000,000 for Foreign Military Financing grants and $4,000,000 for Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining, and Related programs for each Baltic country. This significant financial support is aimed at strengthening the national militaries and border guard forces within the Baltic region. The bill lacks detailed criteria for fund allocation, creating potential risks of inefficient use of funds and perceived favoritism, which is a point of concern in the identified issues.

  3. Direct Loans (Section 202): The bill makes provisions for direct loans up to $8,000,000,000 through fiscal year 2026 to Ukraine and NATO allies. This significant financial commitment aims to support defense capabilities. Section 2606 of the Ukraine Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2022 governs the terms, but without clear oversight, there is a potential risk for extended financial commitments without adequately defined controls, highlighting concerns of wasteful spending.

  4. Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (Section 204): The initiative extends for fiscal years 2026 and 2027, allocating $300,000,000 annually. This consistent funding underpins efforts to provide security assistance to Ukraine. The clear financial commitment has been established, but with the extension, potential transparency issues in expenditure oversight remain.

  5. United States-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation (Section 111): There is an authorization of $30,000,000 annually from 2025 through 2029 to bolster engagement in Europe, focusing on countering Russian influence, especially in nuclear energy. This substantial funding supports strategic energy projects but calls for careful analysis to ensure alignment with national priorities.

Financial Implications Related to Identified Issues

  • Lack of Clear Criteria: As highlighted in the issues section, the lack of detailed criteria or oversight mechanisms presents a risk of inefficient fund use, particularly in Sections 109 and 203. Without stringent guidelines, financial allocations may not achieve intended objectives, leading to misapplication or waste.

  • Lend-Lease Authority Extension (Section 201): Extending the authority to 2028 without a detailed budget plan poses a risk of financial commitments without definitive oversight, thus potentially leading to wasteful spending or mismanaged resources, reflecting one of the concerns listed about prolonged fiscal engagements.

  • Non-Specified Financial Sanctions (Section 302 and 317): The lack of specifics on which entities are subject to financial sanctions can result in inconsistent application, which could complicate enforcement and impact effectiveness.

Through these analyses, the significant financial components of the bill highlight both commitments to Ukraine's support and areas demanding greater scrutiny and control, mainly to ensure transparency, efficiency, and alignment with overarching policy goals.

Issues

  • The document's language across multiple sections, such as Section 1 and Section 301, is dense and complex, making it difficult for those not familiar with legislative terms to understand. This could hinder public engagement and comprehension of the bill's impacts (Sections 1, 301).

  • Section 104 of the bill amends the BUILD Act to support Ukraine without clearly defined scope or limits, potentially leading to unaccounted spending or misuse. Additionally, the exemption 'NON-APPLICABILITY TO UKRAINE' might create inconsistencies in application, raising concerns about governance and execution (Section 104).

  • Section 105 allows the Secretary of State discretionary power to provide war risk insurance to vessels based on national security interests, which could lead to subjective decision-making or lack of transparency (Section 105).

  • The allocation of $250,000,000 to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty in Section 108 raises questions about the appropriateness and efficiency of taxpayer spending, requiring a cost-benefit analysis to justify such large appropriations (Section 108).

  • Section 201 extends the Lend-Lease authority to 2028 without a detailed budget, potentially leading to extended financial commitments without clear oversight, thus risking wasteful spending (Section 201).

  • The criteria and clarity of what constitutes 'malign influence operations' in Section 109 are lacking, creating potential gaps in enforcement and effectiveness of countering disinformation (Section 109).

  • Section 203 authorizes significant funding for Baltic countries without providing detailed criteria for fund allocation or spending, which might lead to inefficient use of funds or perceived favoritism (Section 203).

  • Section 302 lacks clear criteria for determining which Russian financial institutions to sanction, resulting in potential ambiguity and inconsistent application of sanctions (Section 302).

  • The timeliness and administrative burden of the President's requirement to make determinations every 90 days in Section 301 could pose an operational challenge without justified necessity (Section 301).

  • Section 314's provision to increase tariff rates to 500% on Russian imports appears arbitrary without economic justification, potentially impacting international trade relationships and leading to legal challenges (Section 314).

  • Section 317's sanctions lack clarity and specific criteria for determining which foreign persons' property and interests should be blocked, risking potential misapplication (Section 317).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Ukraine Support Act outlines measures to support Ukraine through diplomacy, security assistance, and sanctions on Russia. It includes provisions for strengthening NATO ties, supporting Ukraine's reconstruction, providing military assistance, and imposing sanctions on Russian individuals and industries to increase pressure on Russia over its actions.

101. Affirming support for Ukraine Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress expresses strong support for Ukraine by highlighting the country's resilience against Russia's aggressive invasion, condemning Russia's war crimes, and urging the withdrawal of Russian forces. It also stresses the importance of international cooperation in addressing these issues, ensuring accountability for war crimes, and involving Ukraine in discussions about its future.

102. Reaffirming the importance of NATO Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section emphasizes the importance of the United States' commitment to NATO, highlighting NATO's role in global security and its response to threats from countries like Russia and China. It also acknowledges the contributions of NATO allies in supporting Ukraine and calls for members to enhance their defense contributions and cooperation in advanced technologies.

103. Condemning the kidnapping of Ukrainian children Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress condemns the Russian Federation for its actions of kidnapping and forcibly transferring Ukrainian children, which violates the Genocide Convention and is seen as an attempt to erase Ukrainian identity and future leadership. Additionally, Congress holds Russia responsible for exposing these children to trafficking, exploitation, and various forms of violence, expressing strong disapproval of these actions.

104. Support for Ukraine under title II of the BUILD Act of 2018 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section modifies the Better Utilization of Investments Leading to Development (BUILD) Act of 2018 by adding language to include Ukraine in receiving support and specifying that certain rules won't apply to Ukraine under this support.

105. Vessel war risk insurance Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that certain vessels importing or exporting cargo to or from Ukraine are eligible for insurance, even if they don't meet usual requirements, for five years after this law begins. It defines a "covered vessel" as one owned by a citizen or company of NATO countries, Ukraine, or other countries approved by the Secretary of State for national security reasons.

106. Insurance for Ukraine Initiative Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The "Insurance for Ukraine Initiative" is a program established by the U.S. Department of State to provide war risk insurance to support Ukraine's economic recovery and encourage investment from European allies. It also aims to promote Ukraine's integration with European countries and the United States, facilitate private sector involvement, and ensure the flow of grain and food from Ukraine. The Secretary of State is required to report progress to Congress annually, and seeks diplomatic support for countries involved in providing this insurance.

107. Codification of a Special Coordinator for Ukrainian Reconstruction Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill establishes a Special Coordinator for Ukrainian Reconstruction within the Department of State, selected by the Secretary of State. This person, with private sector experience and knowledge of Ukraine, will help coordinate U.S. efforts and resources to aid in Ukraine's recovery and work with agencies to mobilize private funding for reconstruction efforts.

108. Support for Radio Free Europe Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress expresses its support for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty by restoring its capabilities, authorizing $250 million in funding for 2026, and considering new bureaus to expand its audience. The organization is urged to counteract Russian disinformation, enhance its digital media presence, and maintain its critical role in providing independent news, despite pressures from the Russian government.

Money References

  • (a) Sense of congress.—It is the sense of Congress that— (1) Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty shall be immediately restored to its full capacity and operational position prior to Executive order attempting to shutter the agency; (2) Radio Free Europe provides reliable, uncensored, and accessible news and reporting in Ukraine and other countries where media freedom is restricted; (3) Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty is one of the most critical sources of unrestricted, independent news and reporting for audiences on the periphery of the Russian Federation; (4) the Government of the Russian Federation has engaged in systematic targeting of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty reporters inside the Russian Federation, which has negatively impacted the organization’s ability to provide timely, reliable, and accurate news from inside the country; and (5) despite pressure from the Government of the Russian Federation, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty’s audience continues to grow inside the Russian Federation and surrounding countries. (b) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated $250,000,000 for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty for fiscal year 2026. (c) Authorization of new bureaus.—Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty may explore opening new bureaus to help expand its ability to reach audiences on the periphery of the Russian Federation.

109. Authorizing programs to counter and combat Russian disinformation activities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a requirement for the Secretary of State to use funds to help Ukraine fight Russian disinformation and develop defense strategies. Within 60 days, a strategy must be submitted to Congress, detailing plans to support Ukraine's media literacy, remove disinformation, and bolster independent media outlets in both Ukrainian and Russian-speaking regions.

110. Establishment of Ukraine Reconstruction Trust Fund Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill establishes the "Ukraine Reconstruction Trust Fund" in the U.S. Treasury to support Ukraine with reconstruction, humanitarian aid, economic growth, and good governance, funded by taxes from a specific section and subject to regulations from the Foreign Assistance Act. A report on fund usage must be submitted annually to certain congressional committees for four years.

9512. Ukraine Reconstruction Trust Fund Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Ukraine Reconstruction Trust Fund is established in the U.S. Treasury to support Ukraine's rebuilding efforts. This fund will be used for reconstruction, humanitarian aid, economic growth, and governance improvement in Ukraine, and it follows the guidelines of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 but will not earn interest.

111. United States-European Nuclear Energy Cooperation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The United States Congress is seeking to enhance nuclear energy cooperation with Europe while countering Russian influence. This plan includes developing a strategy by the Secretary of State, working with allies, and prioritizing U.S. and allied technologies, with a focus on maintaining safety and nonproliferation standards. Additionally, $30 million is authorized annually from 2025 to 2029 to support initiatives in Europe.

Money References

  • (g) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated $30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029 to support critically needed engagement in Europe consistent with the strategy required by subsection (c) on countering Russian malign influence and with a particular focus on responsible nuclear power program capacity building, early stage nuclear power project support, and countering Russian disinformation campaigns.

201. Lend-lease authority Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act to extend its authority through fiscal year 2028 and requires the Secretary of State to report to Congress within 90 days of using this authority, detailing the defense articles provided and plans for their recovery.

202. Direct loans and foreign military financing Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows for up to $8 billion in direct loans for Ukraine and NATO allies through 2026, overriding some existing restrictions, and uses certain funds from the Department of State's foreign military financing for loan costs. It also incorporates emergency funding terms, ensuring the funds are available if the President designates them as emergency requirements.

Money References

  • (a) Direct loans.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Through fiscal year 2026, direct loans under section 23 of the Arms Export Control Act may be made available for Ukraine and North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies, notwithstanding section 23(c)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act, gross obligations for the principal amounts of which shall not exceed $8,000,000,000.
  • (b) Terms and conditions.—The terms and conditions described in section 2606 of the Ukraine Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2022 (division N of Public Law 117–103) shall apply to amounts made available by this section in the same manner and to the same extent as amounts made available by such section except that subsection (b) of such section shall be applied by striking “$4,000,000,000” and inserting “$8,000,000,000”. (c) Emergency designation.—Amounts repurposed pursuant to this section that were previously designated by the Congress as an emergency requirement pursuant to a concurrent resolution on the budget or the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, are designated by the Congress as being for an emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985:

203. Support for Baltic countries Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section authorizes the U.S. Secretary of State to implement programs to strengthen the military and border security forces of Baltic countries as outlined in the 2024–2028 defense plans. It allows for specific funding to be allocated for military financing and nonproliferation efforts over three fiscal years and requires a briefing to U.S. congressional committees on the security needs of Baltic nations, funding plans, and international support.

Money References

  • (a) Assistance authorized.—The Secretary of State shall carry out programs, projects, and activities to build the capacity of the national militaries and border guard forces of Baltic countries, pursuant to the 2024 Bilateral Defense Cooperation Roadmaps for 2024–2028, which provide for the promotion of “defense cooperation in integrated air and missile defense, maritime domain awareness, cyber, irregular warfare, participation in international military operations and exercises, infrastructure development, and training”. (b) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of State, for each of the fiscal years 2026, 2027, and 2028, in addition to amounts already authorized to be appropriated for such purposes to carry out the assistance described in subsection (a)— (1) $30,000,000 for Foreign Military Financing grants authorized under section 23 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2763) for each Baltic country; and (2) $4,000,000 for Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining, and Related programs, including as authorized under the Foreign Assistance Act (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.)

204. Extension of Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill extends the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative by adding $300,000,000 in funding for each of the fiscal years 2026 and 2027, and moves the expiration date of the initiative to December 31, 2027.

Money References

  • Section 1250 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1068) is amended— (1) in subsection (f), by adding at the end the following: “(11) For fiscal year 2026, $300,000,000.
  • For fiscal year 2027, $300,000,000.”; and (2) in subsection (h), by striking “December 31, 2026” and inserting “December 31, 2027”.

205. Report on allied and partner military contributions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of State, with input from the Secretary of Defense, must submit a report every 90 days to certain congressional committees. This report will detail the military support provided or planned by allied countries, specify what military resources Ukraine currently needs, and outline how the United States is helping meet these needs through arms transfers and support efforts. The report will be mostly unclassified, but it may have a separate, classified section.

206. Report on United States-Ukraine intelligence support and cooperation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Director of National Intelligence to submit a classified report every 90 days to certain congressional committees about the U.S. intelligence support to Ukraine's military and intelligence services. This report must include details about the current support, the potential impact of ending this support, and ongoing efforts to enhance Ukraine's intelligence capabilities.

301. Sanctions trigger determination Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The President must decide within 15 days of the law being enacted, and then at least every 90 days, if Russia or its allies are either waging war against Ukraine, not genuinely negotiating peace, or violating a peace agreement with Ukraine.

302. Imposition of sanctions with respect to Russian financial institutions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that the President must impose sanctions on at least three specified Russian financial institutions, such as Sberbank and VTB, within 15 days of a certain determination. Additionally, the President must update Congress every 90 days with a list of other important Russian financial institutions to be sanctioned if they are linked to the Russian government and deemed a national security threat.

303. Impositions of sanctions with respect to Russian oil and mining industry Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the President to impose sanctions on all Russian companies involved in oil, gas, coal, and mineral industries within 15 days of confirming that such action is necessary, as outlined in another section of the bill.

304. Imposition of sanctions on certain persons affiliated with or supporting the Government of the Russian Federation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that within 15 days of determining specific conditions are met, the President must impose sanctions on key officials of the Russian government and military listed, as well as any additional officials deemed necessary every 90 days, to protect U.S. national security. The sanctions target individuals involved in significant roles within the Armed Forces and intelligence agencies of the Russian Federation.

305. Crimea tunnel sanctions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress finds that Russia invaded and annexed Crimea and has since used it in its invasion of Ukraine, and now plans to build a tunnel with China to further connect it. In response, the President must impose sanctions on any foreign individuals who help construct, maintain, or repair any connection between Russia and Crimea.

306. Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant sanctions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that the President impose sanctions on foreign individuals who have compromised the safety or control of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Station in Ukraine, following a specific determination. However, exceptions exist for those attempting to restore Ukrainian control over the power station or its surrounding area.

307. Rosatom sanctions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The President is required to impose sanctions on Rosatom, its subsidiaries, and any foreign person involved in significant nuclear transactions with Rosatom, following a certain determination. However, these sanctions can be waived if the transaction is necessary for producing vital medical or industrial isotopes and if the President certifies efforts to establish alternative supply chains not dependent on Rosatom or Russian materials.

308. Imposition of price cap vessel sanctions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the requirement for the President to impose sanctions on foreign vessels transporting Russian oil in violation of a price cap policy, except when provisions are needed for safety. It also mandates the creation of a strategy to improve international adherence to this policy, listing specific areas for assessment, including international purchase compliance, detection avoidance methods, and potential U.S. incentives or additional sanctions to enhance compliance.

309. SWIFT sanctions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the President to impose specific sanctions on global financial communication services that continue to provide messaging services to certain financial institutions identified in the Act, within 15 days of a determination. It also explains that facilitating access to these services, even indirectly, through other financial institutions, is included in this sanction requirement.

310. Russian sovereign debt sanctions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The President is required to ban all transactions by Americans involving Russian government debt, including government bonds, if it's determined necessary under a specific condition, within 30 days of that determination. This applies to debt issued after the law is enacted.

311. Imposition of sanctions on Russia-North Korea cooperation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines sanctions to be imposed on any foreign individuals, companies, or financial institutions involved in supporting Russian activities in Ukraine through cooperation with North Korea. It also mandates the President to submit regular reports to Congress about North Korea's support of Russia, detailing related activities and providing a strategy to counteract these efforts.

312. Sanctions for kidnapping Ukrainian children Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The President must impose specified sanctions on any foreign individuals involved in the kidnapping or illegal relocation of Ukrainian children, within 15 days after making a positive determination under section 301.

313. Imposition of dual-use export controls Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill lays out rules for controlling the export of foreign products made using U.S. technology that might end up in Russia, detailing product and destination requirements. It also mandates the Department of Commerce and the Department of State to strategize against illegal exports to Iran, especially relating to unmanned aircraft technologies, while granting exceptions for certain items like food and medical devices.

314. Duties on the Russian Federation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that within 15 days of a positive decision under section 301, the President must increase import duties on goods and services from Russia to at least 500%. Additionally, within 60 days of this decision, the President must report the effects of these tariffs on U.S. imports to congressional committees.

315. Ending Russian oil import loophole Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill amends the Ending Importation of Russian Oil Act to ban the import into the U.S. of energy products from refineries using Russian crude oil, widening restrictions beyond just oil from Russia. It adjusts existing sections to incorporate these new prohibitions.

3. Prohibition on importation of energy products produced at refineries outside the Russian Federation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section prohibits importing any energy products into the United States if they are made at refineries that use crude oil from Russia. These products are listed under chapter 27 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.

316. Taxing capital gains on Russian sovereign assets Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section imposes a 100% tax on certain income from Russian and Belarusian government assets that are blocked under U.S. law, overriding any treaty obligations. It also requires anyone handling this income to withhold the tax, which applies to interest and dividends received after the Act becomes law.

317. Sanctions described Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes three types of sanctions: property blocking, where the U.S. President can stop all deals involving a foreign person's property in the U.S.; restrictions on visas and entry for aliens, where certain foreign individuals are not allowed to enter the U.S., and their visas can be canceled immediately; and opposing financial support from international institutions, where the U.S. will use its influence to block loans or investments that benefit the sanctioned person.

318. Implementation; regulations; penalties Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section empowers the President to use certain authorities under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to enforce this law. The President is also required to issue necessary regulations, licenses, and orders, and anyone violating these measures will face penalties as outlined in the Act.

319. Exceptions; waiver Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines situations where sanctions won't apply, including when necessary for international treaty compliance, providing humanitarian aid, or conducting intelligence and national security activities. It also explains that the President can waive sanctions for national security reasons if they notify Congress of the decision and its justification at least 15 days beforehand.

320. Termination Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The President has the authority to end certain sanctions and penalties against Russia if it stops its aggressive actions or violations against Ukraine. If Russia resumes such actions, the President must immediately restore all previously lifted sanctions and penalties.

321. Congressional review of Russia sanctions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The U.S. Congress requires the President to inform them about certain actions regarding Russia sanctions, such as ending or altering the sanctions, before proceeding. Congress has 30 to 60 days to review these actions, during which the President cannot act without Congress's approval, and both houses can introduce resolutions to support or reject the proposed actions.

322. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines various terms used in the bill, such as "admission," "appropriate committees of Congress," and "foreign person." It details what each term means, like identifying which congressional committees are relevant or specifying that a foreign person is someone not considered a United States person.