Overview
Title
To establish competitive Federal grants that will empower community colleges and minority-serving institutions to become incubators for infant and toddler child care talent, training, and access on their campuses and in their communities, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The PROSPECT Act wants to give schools money to help parents who are students take care of their young children while they learn, and to train more people to take care of kids, especially in places that need it the most.
Summary AI
H. R. 2845, known as the “Preparing and Resourcing Our Student Parents and Early Childhood Teachers Act” or the “PROSPECT Act,” proposes creating federal grants to help community colleges and minority-serving institutions expand child care facilities for infants and toddlers. The bill aims to make child care more accessible and affordable for student parents at these institutions, thereby enabling them to complete their education with less debt. It will support the training and recruitment of child care professionals, particularly in underserved areas, and facilitate partnerships with local high schools and four-year institutions to strengthen the pipeline of diverse and skilled early childhood educators. Additionally, the bill provides measures for institutional eligibility, program evaluation, and reporting to ensure effective implementation and outcomes.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, known as the "Preparing and Resourcing Our Student Parents and Early Childhood Teachers Act" or the "PROSPECT Act," is designed to enhance access to quality child care for infants and toddlers of student parents attending community colleges and minority-serving institutions. It aims to establish various grants to bolster child care services on these campuses, enrich training for early childhood educators, and strengthen the overall workforce in this vital sector.
General Summary of the Bill
Purpose: The bill authorizes the allocation of significant federal funds, specifically $9 billion, over five years for creating programs and establishing grants aimed at increasing the availability, accessibility, and quality of infant and toddler care. Additionally, the bill aims to expand the training and development pipelines for early childhood educators, with a focus on underserved areas.
Structure: The bill is structured in various sections, each detailing specific programs and grants such as planning, access, impact, and pipeline grants. These grants are intended to fund diverse initiatives, including developing early childhood educator programs, enhancing child care facilities, and providing comprehensive child care solutions for eligible student parents.
Summary of Significant Issues
One substantial issue is the lack of specific criteria for fund distribution and oversight (Sec. 103). The authorization of $9 billion without clear guidelines could lead to inefficiencies or even wasteful spending. Another issue is the vague eligibility criteria for grants (Sec. 121), where terms like "eligible entities" could open doors for misuse or confusion in allocation.
The bill also lacks clarity in defining some critical terms (Sec. 102), such as "community college" or "minority-serving institution," relying on external references which might lead to varied interpretations. Additionally, the evaluation criteria for grants (Sec. 126) do not provide clear benchmarks for success, risking subjective assessments and data collection challenges.
Concerns about potential favoring of certain institutions (Sec. 111) arise because the bill focuses on community colleges and minority-serving institutions, potentially sidelining other worthy applicants like private or nontraditional educational bodies. Also, the complexity of legal languages in sections like "Nondiscrimination in programs and activities" (Sec. 128) could make the non-discrimination protections less accessible to the average reader.
Potential Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill aims to improve access to affordable child care and enhance educational and employment opportunities for student parents, which could reduce parental dropout rates in higher education. By focusing on early childhood development and supporting education for child care providers, the bill seeks to elevate the quality of care available, which benefits societal health and education outcomes.
Potential Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Student Parents: The bill positively impacts student parents, particularly those from low-income backgrounds, by removing significant financial and access barriers to quality child care. This support could lead to higher graduation rates and reduced student debt.
Community Colleges and Minority-Serving Institutions: These institutions stand to gain substantial support and resources, enhancing their ability to attract and support student parents. However, the concentrated focus on these entities could result in perceived inequities, as other institutions might not receive similar opportunities or that level of investment.
Child Care Providers: The bill's focus on expanding and enhancing child care opportunities offers providers significant resources for professional development and quality improvement. However, training programs and quality standards implementation must be streamlined and clear to avoid confusion.
Overall, the bill expresses a strong commitment to developing critical infrastructure supporting student parents and enhancing early childhood educational opportunities. However, the success of its implementation will largely depend on addressing the highlighted issues, ensuring clear guidelines, equitable resource distribution, and a transparent, accountable process for grant allocation and oversight.
Financial Assessment
The PROSPECT Act delineates several financial allocations aimed at expanding childcare facilities at community colleges and minority-serving institutions, supporting student parents, and bolstering the workforce of early childhood educators.
Summary of Financial Allocations
The bill authorizes an appropriation of $9,000,000,000 for fiscal years 2026 through 2030, with these funds designated to support various grant programs. Under Section 113, individual community colleges or minority-serving institutions may receive grants of up to $20,000,000, and consortia of these institutions may receive up to $220,000,000. These financial figures underscore the significant financial scope and impact that the bill intends to generate.
Relation to Issues Identified
Oversight and Distribution of Appropriations: The authorization of $9,000,000,000 lacks detailed criteria for distributing funds and oversight mechanisms. This absence of specificity risks inefficiencies or misuse, as there is inadequate assurance of accountability in how these substantial financial resources will be managed and monitored.
Grant Amounts and Justification: The provision to award grants up to $20,000,000 for individual institutions and $220,000,000 for consortia presents potential risks of unaccountable spending. The bill does not stipulate stringent justifications or monitoring processes, making it challenging to ensure money is effectively utilized. This can lead to perceptions of biased or imbalanced allocation across qualifying institutions.
Vagueness in Eligibility and Impact Assessment: The eligibility criteria for grants, as discussed in Section 121, is notably vague. Without clear definitions of 'eligible entities,' there exists a risk of ambiguity which may lead to disputes over fund allocation and possible misuse. The lack of baseline measures for evaluating grant impacts also poses challenges for objectively assessing the financial contributions' effectiveness.
Potential Bias in Institutional Focus: The focus on community colleges and minority-serving institutions might unintentionally marginalize other potentially deserving institutions. While these schools play crucial roles, the financial limitation to only these entities might restrict broader educational benefits elsewhere, suggesting potential biases in fund distribution.
Complexity in Legal and Financial Integrations: The non-discrimination clauses in Section 128 cite complex legal frameworks without clear explanations, potentially obscuring the understanding of financial protections linked to these allocations. Likewise, financial provisions for dependent care in Section 301 lack detailed eligibility criteria and potential impacts, leading to inconsistent financial aid application.
The allocation of such large sums necessitates comprehensive monitoring to ensure they are spent appropriately and equitably. Enhanced clarity in eligibility, accountability, and oversight measures is imperative to maximize the effective use of appropriated funds in achieving the bill's goals.
Issues
The authorization of $9,000,000,000 in appropriations (Sec. 103) lacks specific criteria for fund distribution and oversight, raising concerns about potential inefficiencies or wasteful spending.
Definitions for critical terms, including 'community college' and 'minority-serving institution' (Sec. 102), rely heavily on external references without providing specific language, which could lead to misunderstandings and inconsistent interpretations.
The eligibility criteria for grants (Sec. 121) is vague, particularly concerning 'eligible entities', which might lead to ambiguity in grant allocation and potential misuse of funds.
The section on 'Evaluation criteria for grants' (Sec. 126) lacks a clear baseline for measuring impact or effectiveness, risking subjective evaluations, and poses administrative burdens for data collection.
The 'Table of contents' section (Sec. 2) highlights issues with broad titles and absence of detail, which makes it challenging to understand the financial and practical implications of the bill's provisions.
The provision allowing for significant sums ($20,000,000 for individual institutions and $220,000,000 for consortia) in grants (Sec. 113) without stringent justifications or monitoring adds to the risk of unaccountable spending.
The planning and implementation grant process (Sec. 122) does not lay out clear guidelines for committee composition or needs assessments, which could result in bias or inconsistent reporting.
The section on 'Nondiscrimination in programs and activities' (Sec. 128) includes complex legal references and may not clearly convey non-discrimination protections to all stakeholders.
The potential for favoring certain institutions over others (Sec. 111) by focusing specifically on community colleges and minority-serving institutions might limit the scope of benefits and lead to perceptions of bias.
The section on 'Sharing dependent care allowance information for Federal student aid' (Sec. 301) lacks details on eligibility criteria and potential financial impacts, which could result in inconsistent application.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act provides its short title, allowing it to be informally referred to as the "Preparing and Resourcing Our Student Parents and Early Childhood Teachers Act" or the "PROSPECT Act."
2. Table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the table of contents for an act that includes various titles and sections related to grants and programs supporting infant and toddler child care, as well as child care and development block grants. It details the structure of the act, listing key components like purpose, definitions, and specific types of grants, along with provisions for program administration, eligibility, funding, and outreach activities.
3. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has identified several key issues related to childcare, highlighting that a child's brain develops rapidly in the early years and quality childcare can support their future success. However, childcare is often unaffordable for many families, and student parents face significant challenges in accessing childcare, with limited availability at colleges and universities, particularly for children under age 3.
Money References
- In 2023, the average cost of childcare in the United States was $3,190 a month for nanny care, $1,230 a month for a daycare center, and $992 a month for home daycare, with families on average spending 24 percent of their household income on childcare expenses.
101. Purpose Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section aims to increase access to child care for infants and toddlers who have parents attending public community colleges and minority-serving institutions. It also seeks to enhance the workforce by making it more diverse and strengthening the skills of child care providers, focusing especially on underserved communities and areas lacking adequate child care.
102. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill provides definitions for key terms related to education and child care, such as “community college,” “dual language learner,” and “minority-serving institution.” It covers terminology that clarifies different educational programs, child care services, and other related concepts to ensure a clear understanding of the provisions mentioned in the bill.
103. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
There is a total of $9 billion authorized to be set aside for the implementation of this title, to be spent over the five fiscal years from 2026 to 2030.
Money References
- There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this title a total of $9,000,000,000 for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
111. Program authorized Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a program where the Secretary will use funds to provide various types of grants to eligible entities. These grants include planning grants for developing plans, access grants to offer free child care to infants and toddlers of student parents, impact grants to enhance child care quality and availability, and pipeline grants for training early childhood educators and building partnerships to strengthen the workforce. The Secretary will coordinate with health and business officials in managing these grants.
112. Application; selection criteria Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the application process and selection criteria for grants aimed at improving infant and toddler child care in colleges. It details what must be included in grant applications, how grants will be prioritized, and the special considerations that may lead to additional funding, with a focus on areas lacking child care services and supporting low-income and minority communities.
113. Amount, duration, and administration of grants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes the rules for grant amounts and durations under subtitle B, stating that grants to individual community colleges or minority-serving institutions cannot exceed $20 million, while those to a consortium can go up to $220 million. Grants typically last 4 years, except for 1-year planning grants, and eligible entities can enter annual grant competitions to receive various grants, including multiple overlapping ones, without affecting grants from other federal laws.
Money References
- (a) Amount of grants.—Each grant awarded under subtitle B to an eligible entity shall be in an amount of— (1) in the case of a grant awarded to an individual community college or minority-serving institution, not more than $20,000,000; and (2) in the case of a grant to a consortium of community colleges or minority-serving institutions, not more than $220,000,000.
121. Grants authorized Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary is authorized to give grants to eligible entities, which include planning grants to assess child care needs, access grants for free child care for children under 3, impact grants to enhance child care services, and pipeline grants to support and grow the early childhood educator workforce.
122. Planning grants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Eligible entities receiving grants under this section must use the funds to form a committee to reflect on community needs, assess infant and toddler child care needs, plan for expanded access to child care, and develop a proposal focusing on parents with children under age 3. They must report the needs assessment results, the proposal, and any additional grant applications to the Secretary within 30 days after the grant period ends.
123. Access grants providing infant and toddler child care for community college or minority-serving institution student parents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
An eligible entity receiving a grant under this section must use the funds to provide free infant and toddler childcare for student parents at community colleges or minority-serving institutions by expanding, operating, or collaborating with child care centers, ensuring priority for low-income student parents, and adhering to quality and licensing standards. Furthermore, grant recipients must report annually on various metrics, such as the demographics of participating parents and children, compliance with disability standards, and the rates of student persistence and completion, while maintaining individuals' privacy.
124. Impact grants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Grants under this section are intended to expand and improve child care in communities by providing resources like training, funding, and support for child care providers, with a focus on increasing access to quality care for infants and toddlers, particularly in underserved areas. The program also emphasizes professional development in multiple languages, support for historically underrepresented groups, and requires annual reporting on the grant's impact, ensuring diversity and privacy in the disclosed information.
125. Pipeline grants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Grants under this section aim to improve the workforce for infant and toddler child care providers, especially in underserved areas, by funding activities like developing educational programs, hiring faculty, coordinating with community colleges, enhancing child care centers for training, awarding student microgrants, and forming partnerships with high schools and universities. Reporting on the results includes data on student demographics, microgrant usage, and partnerships, ensuring privacy and statistical reliability.
126. Evaluation criteria for grants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines how the effectiveness of different types of educational grants will be evaluated each year, focusing on the impact on students, child care services, and educator preparation programs. It includes criteria like the number of students benefiting from the grants, use of child care services, professional development provided, and outcomes related to persistence and completion of educational programs.
127. Report to Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary is required to create and submit a yearly report to Congress about the grant program. This report must include the latest evaluation results and updates on the achievements of the grants based on recent reports from sections 122(b), 123(c), 124(c), and 125(b).
128. Nondiscrimination in programs and activities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that no person in the United States can be discriminated against based on their race, religion, sex, or several other personal characteristics in programs funded by this title. It also states that any violations will be treated like those under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and clarifies that this section does not alter existing provisions of a related child care law.
201. Eligibility Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act to broaden the definition of what counts as a job training or educational program for eligibility purposes, including higher education and secondary education programs. It also ensures that state eligibility standards for child care aid cannot be more restrictive than federal standards.
202. Conforming amendments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section updates the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act to include references to a new act called the Preparing and Resourcing Our Student Parents and Early Childhood Teachers Act, ensuring that child care centers covered by this new act are appropriately identified in the existing law.
203. Increased Federal matching payments for child care Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Social Security Act allows the federal government to match a state's spending on child care. This amount is either based on the state's approved funding or is calculated by considering the state's assistance for infants and toddlers and other children, with a focus on those areas where market rates or an approved cost estimation model is used.
301. Sharing dependent care allowance information for Federal student aid Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 301 modifies the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include information about a dependent care allowance for students with dependents, which can affect their financial aid. It explains that these students may qualify for additional allowances in their cost of attendance and provides guidance on how they can apply for this assistance.