Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to restrict the access and use of veterans’ data by the US DOGE Service and special Government employees, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 2828 is a new rule that says the government can't use veterans' private information for the wrong reasons and has to give it back when they're done using it. It tries to keep veterans' personal data safe and sound, like keeping a secret in a special locked box.
Summary AI
H.R. 2828, known as the "VA DATA Access Transparency and Accountability Act of 2025," aims to protect veterans' personal information. It prevents the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from giving the Department of Government Efficiency access to any veteran's data. Additionally, special government employees are prohibited from accessing or using veterans’ data for commercial purposes or any unauthorized governmental purposes. The bill ensures that these employees return all data to the Department of Veterans Affairs without keeping any copies once their service ends.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, titled the "VA DATA Access Transparency and Accountability Act of 2025" or "VA DATA Act of 2025," aims to regulate the handling of veterans' personal data by the Department of Veterans Affairs. This bill restricts the access and use of this sensitive information by the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and any special government employees to prevent potential misuse.
General Summary of the Bill
The central goal of the VA DATA Act of 2025 is to safeguard veterans’ data by limiting who has access to it and how it can be used. The bill explicitly prohibits the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from sharing veterans’ data with the U.S. DOGE Service. It also prevents special government employees from accessing or using this data for commercial purposes or any unauthorized reasons. The bill further mandates that, once a special government employee's service period concludes, they must return any accessed data and are prohibited from retaining copies. Additionally, the bill defines key terms related to veterans’ data, including personal health information and personal identifying information.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the bill's current language and scope. One notable concern is the potential for the restriction on data sharing to impede necessary collaboration with other legitimate government entities which may require access to veteran data for authorized purposes. Moreover, the bill lacks explicit enforcement methods or penalties for unauthorized commercial use of the data, raising questions about how violations would be managed. The definition of a "special Government employee" could be confusing to those not versed in legal terminology, leading to misunderstandings about to whom the law applies.
The bill also employs complex language to describe veterans’ data, potentially hindering broader understanding and implementation. The use of broad terms such as "governmental purpose authorized by the Secretary" raises the risk of varied interpretations and inconsistent applications of the law. Furthermore, there is a notable absence of data protection measures and security protocols to ensure the safety of veterans' data in the Department's custody, which might compromise the data's confidentiality and security.
Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders
For the general public, particularly veterans and their families, the legislation could provide reassurance that their personal data is being protected from unauthorized use, especially for commercial gain. By setting boundaries on who can access veterans’ data, the bill seeks to uphold privacy and trust between veterans and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
However, the bill might negatively impact governmental agencies if the prohibition of data sharing is too restrictive, making it challenging to carry out legitimate governmental functions requiring access to such data. This tension underscores the need for a balanced approach that addresses privacy concerns while allowing necessary inter-agency collaboration.
For special government employees, the bill introduces stricter accountability standards, limiting their ability to access veteran data beyond authorized purposes. While this protects veterans’ privacy, it could also complicate roles that legitimately require data access within a secure and defined framework.
Overall, while this bill represents an important step toward data protection for veterans, careful consideration and clarification of enforcement mechanisms, alongside security measures, are crucial to its effective implementation. This would ensure the legislation not only restricts access appropriately but also facilitates trust in the protection of sensitive veterans' information.
Issues
The restriction on the Secretary of Veterans Affairs could potentially hinder collaboration or data sharing with legitimate governmental entities if not properly clarified. A lack of clarity could lead to misunderstandings around which entities can or cannot access veteran data for legitimate purposes. (Section 2(a))
The bill does not specify the methods of enforcement or penalties for violation regarding 'commercial gain', which could lead to ambiguities in implementation. This might result in data misuse without adequate recourse or accountability. (Section 2(b))
The term 'special Government employee' may not be clear to those unfamiliar with specific legal definitions, leading to confusion as to whom this bill applies. This could result in misinterpretation of the bill's scope and applicability. (Section 2(d)(1))
The language used to define 'veteran's data' is detailed and comprehensive but might be overly complex for a general understanding. This could lead to difficulties in operationalizing the legislation or ensuring compliance. (Section 2(d)(2))
The bill uses the term 'governmental purpose authorized by the Secretary,' which is broad and could lead to varying interpretations. Lack of specific criteria or examples may cause inconsistent application of the law. (Section 2(b)(2))
The bill doesn't mention specific data protection measures or security protocols to ensure veteran's data remains secure within the Department of Veterans Affairs. This omission could pose risks to data security and increase vulnerability to breaches. (Overall, particularly relevant to Section 2(a) and (c))
There is a lack of specifications on how compliance with the requirement that special Government employees do not retain a copy of any data is to be verified, possibly leading to challenges in enforcement. (Section 2(c)(2))
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act provides its official title, which is “VA DATA Access Transparency and Accountability Act of 2025” or simply the “VA DATA Act of 2025”.
2. Restrictions on access of DOGE Service to personal information about veterans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs cannot share veterans' data with the United States DOGE Service. Additionally, government employees are prohibited from using veterans' data for personal profit and must return all data without retaining copies when their service ends. Definitions of relevant terms including "special Government employee" and "veteran's data" are also provided.