Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish an enhanced deduction for wages paid to automobile manufacturing workers, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Transportation Freedom Act" is a plan to give extra money help to car companies when they pay their workers, but it also changes some pollution rules for cars, which might make people worry about clean air.
Summary AI
H. R. 2814, known as the “Transportation Freedom Act,” proposes amendments to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow businesses a tax deduction equal to 200% for wages paid to automobile manufacturing workers. It requires that a significant portion of vehicle assembly and component manufacturing occur in the United States and mandates robust employee benefits. The bill also repeals certain vehicle emissions standards and waivers, creating new greenhouse gas emissions and fuel economy standards for future years, with input from various industry stakeholders and a focus on technological and economic feasibility.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislative measure, known as the "Transportation Freedom Act," aims to revise the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to promote automobile manufacturing within the United States. This is pursued through a combination of tax incentives for manufacturers and significant policy shifts concerning vehicle emissions standards.
General Summary
The bill outlines four main titles: support for U.S. automobile manufacturing, the repeal of certain emissions standards, modifications to vehicle emissions waivers, and the establishment of new federal emissions standards. A central feature of the bill is the introduction of an enhanced tax deduction designed to incentivize U.S. manufacturers who meet specific requirements, such as ensuring the majority of production occurs domestically and offering high-level employee benefits. The bill also proposes repealing various existing emissions standards and waivers, including those permitting California to impose more stringent vehicle emissions rules. Furthermore, it mandates the establishment of new vehicle emissions standards by federal agencies, aiming for implementation by 2027.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several key issues emerge from the bill's provisions. Firstly, the repeal of existing emission standards and waivers raises questions about environmental accountability and potential adverse effects on air quality. Eliminating California's waivers, which allow for stricter emissions standards, could face substantial legal opposition and affect states' rights.
The new tax deduction for wages paid to automobile workers is generous, offering up to a 200% deduction. However, the criteria for eligibility, such as requiring "platinum level" health coverage for employees, place a financial strain on smaller manufacturers. This may inadvertently favor larger corporations, reducing the competitiveness of smaller industry players. Additionally, the bill lacks detailed financial planning and restraint, potentially leading to unchecked government spending.
Impact on the Public
The bill's implications for the general public are diverse. On one hand, it aims to boost domestic automobile manufacturing, potentially creating jobs and stimulating economic growth. However, by rolling back emissions standards, it could lead to increased pollution, impacting public health, particularly in urban areas that struggle with air quality issues.
The absence of specific guidance on how new emissions standards will be enforced might also lead to uneven compliance and efficacy. Tax incentives might encourage manufacturers to invest more in domestic operations but could also channel public funds into tax breaks without strict oversight mechanisms.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders, such as large automobile manufacturers, might benefit from the bill through substantial tax deductions. Given that larger companies are more likely to meet the stringent requirements for health and retirement benefits, they may enjoy financial advantages over smaller businesses.
Conversely, environmental advocates are likely to oppose the bill due to the potential increase in emissions following the rollback of current standards. Both California and states adopting its standards could face significant regulatory and legal upheaval as a result of waiving state-level emissions flexibility.
In summary, while the bill's provisions aim to enhance domestic automobile manufacturing, the broad repeal of environmental regulations presents concerns of ecological and public health impact. Balancing economic incentives with sustainable environmental practices remains a central challenge for the proposed legislation.
Financial Assessment
The "Transportation Freedom Act" presents significant financial considerations, including both incentives and potential challenges regarding cost implications.
Enhanced Financial Deductions for Employers
The bill proposes an enhanced tax deduction of 200% for wages paid to automobile manufacturing workers. Specifically, Section 199B allows qualifying manufacturers to double the deduction they can claim based on the eligible wages they pay their workers. This is a notable financial incentive aimed at encouraging automobile manufacturing within the United States. However, it is important to note that the maximum amount of wages that can count toward this enhanced deduction is capped at $150,000 per employee per year.
Issues Related to Financial Deductions:
- Favoritism Toward Large Manufacturers: This generous deduction may disproportionately benefit larger manufacturers who can more easily meet the outlined criteria and afford to pay higher wages, potentially leading to what some might view as wasteful spending if it is not properly justified or controlled. Smaller manufacturers may not have the same capacity to take full advantage of this incentive, possibly placing them at a competitive disadvantage.
- Platinum Level Coverage Requirement: Section 101 requires employers to offer "platinum level" health coverage. While this promotes robust employee benefits, the financial burden on manufacturers, especially smaller ones, could be significant. This requirement may potentially lead to excessive spending without a tailored necessity to each employer's financial capabilities.
Repeal and Establishment of Emissions Standards
The bill involves financial references indirectly by shaping the operational environment of automobile manufacturers through regulatory changes. Title II and Title III deal with the repeal of existing emissions standards and waivers, and the establishment of new fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions standards. While these sections do not specify direct spending or allocations, the potential financial impact is substantial.
Potential Financial Implications:
- Regulatory Gaps: The repeal of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, as outlined in Section 203, without immediate replacements could create a regulatory gap, leading to uncertainty among manufacturers regarding future compliance costs.
- Environmental Compliance Costs: The absence of new regulations to replace those repealed could lead to increased emissions, resulting in possible financial penalties or unanticipated compliance costs for manufacturers down the line.
Authorization of Appropriations
Section 404 authorizes appropriations with a broad reference of "such sums as are necessary" to carry out specific parts of the bill.
Financial Accountability Concerns:
- Lack of Specificity: Without clear delineation, there is a concern that this might lead to unchecked spending, complicating financial accountability. The open-ended nature of this authorization could allow for expenditures far beyond initial projections, necessitating rigorous oversight to prevent financial mismanagement.
Conclusion
Overall, while the financial incentives in the bill are designed to strengthen domestic automobile manufacturing, they come with potential financial burdens and risks of misallocation. The combination of enhanced deductions and regulatory changes requires careful balancing to ensure fiscal responsibility while promoting economic growth within the automobile industry.
Issues
The elimination of vehicle emissions waivers, particularly those previously issued to California, could lead to significant legal challenges or disputes, as California and other states have relied on these waivers for their own environmental policies (Section 301).
The repeal of multipollutant emissions standards for light-duty and medium-duty vehicles lacks a clear rationale or analysis of potential environmental impacts, raising concerns about transparency and accountability (Section 201).
The requirement for 'platinum level' health coverage in Section 101 could significantly increase costs for manufacturers, particularly smaller ones, creating a potential financial burden and possibly leading to excessive spending without clear necessity.
The repeal of CAFE standards rules without proposing alternatives may create a regulatory gap affecting fuel economy and emissions, raising environmental and operational concerns for automotive manufacturers and consumers (Section 203).
The generous provision allowing a deduction of 200% for eligible wages in Section 199B might lead to wasteful spending if not properly justified or capped, especially favoring large manufacturers.
The 'neutral position' requirement regarding labor organization efforts in Section 101 is vague and could conflict with organizational strategies, complicating compliance and potentially infringing on corporate rights.
The legislation's lack of financial detail and the phrase 'such sums as are necessary' in Section 404 may lead to unchecked spending and financial accountability issues.
The revocation of existing emissions waivers and repeal of Section 177 of the Clean Air Act without discussing potential impacts on states' environmental policies raises significant concerns about states' rights and future environmental standards (Section 301).
The absence of specific justification for the repeal of phase 3 heavy-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards could lead to increased emissions and potential environmental concerns (Section 202).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Transportation Freedom Act is outlined in the document with various titles addressing different areas, including support for American automobile manufacturing, changes to emissions standards, and the establishment of new vehicle emissions guidelines. The document covers enhanced wage deductions for auto workers, the repeal of certain emissions standards, and the institution of new standards for passenger and heavy-duty vehicles.
101. Enhanced deduction for wages paid to automobile manufacturing workers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces a tax deduction for qualifying automobile manufacturing companies in the U.S. that pay wages meeting certain conditions. Companies can deduct 200% of specific wages if they ensure key aspects like high U.S.-based production, health coverage, retirement benefits, and fair labor practices, while ensuring those wages are above a certain percentile in the industry.
Money References
- “(b) Qualifying taxpayer.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘qualifying taxpayer’ means an entity which, with respect to any taxable year— “(1) is engaged in the production of automobiles or automotive components in the United States, “(2) with respect to any automobiles, light-duty trucks, and heavy-duty trucks sold by the entity for use in the United States during the preceding taxable year, the final assembly (as defined in section 30D(d)(5)) of not less than 75 percent of such vehicles occurred in the United States, “(3) with respect to the manufacturing of finished engines, transmissions, or advanced battery cells (including manufacturing pursuant to joint ventures or other collaborative manufacturing agreements) during the preceding taxable year, not less than 75 percent of such finished engines, transmissions, or advanced battery cells which were incorporated into new automobiles, light-duty trucks, or heavy-duty trucks for sale by the entity were produced in the United States, “(4) during the preceding taxable year, did not transfer production outside of the United States of any automobile or automobile component manufactured in the United States, “(5) during the preceding taxable year, with respect to all applicable individuals, offered— “(A) coverage for the applicable individual under a group health plan in the platinum level of coverage (as described in section 1302(d)(1)(D) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(d)(1)(D))) or a higher level of coverage, and “(B) participation in a defined benefit plan or defined contribution plan that meets the applicable requirement of subsection (e), “(6) during the preceding taxable year, with respect to all retired individuals who, prior to retirement, were applicable individuals, offered coverage for the retired individual under a group health plan in the platinum level of coverage (as described in section 1302(d)(1)(D) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(d)(1)(D))) or a higher level of coverage, “(7) with respect to every $1,000,000,000 distributed as non-recurring dividends, or in stock which was redeemed (within the meaning of section 317(b)), by such entity during such taxable year, provided not less than $2,000 to each applicable individual through a profit-sharing plan, with such amount to be in addition to any prior commitment made by the entity pursuant to an existing profit-sharing plan, as determined as of the date of such distribution or redemption, and “(8) maintained a neutral position during the preceding taxable year— “(A) in any labor organization organizing effort, and “(B) with respect to the exercise of employees and labor organizations of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.).
- “(2) LIMITATION.—The amount of wages which may be taken into account under subsection (a)(1) with respect to any applicable individual shall not exceed $150,000 per taxable year.
199B. Wages paid to automobile manufacturing workers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
For qualifying U.S. automobile manufacturers, this bill section allows a tax deduction of 200% on wages paid to workers if certain conditions are met, like ensuring health and retirement benefits, maintaining U.S.-based production, and supporting fair labor practices. The deduction is subject to wage limits and certification requirements to confirm eligibility.
Money References
- (b) Qualifying taxpayer.—For purposes of this section, the term “qualifying taxpayer” means an entity which, with respect to any taxable year— (1) is engaged in the production of automobiles or automotive components in the United States, (2) with respect to any automobiles, light-duty trucks, and heavy-duty trucks sold by the entity for use in the United States during the preceding taxable year, the final assembly (as defined in section 30D(d)(5)) of not less than 75 percent of such vehicles occurred in the United States, (3) with respect to the manufacturing of finished engines, transmissions, or advanced battery cells (including manufacturing pursuant to joint ventures or other collaborative manufacturing agreements) during the preceding taxable year, not less than 75 percent of such finished engines, transmissions, or advanced battery cells which were incorporated into new automobiles, light-duty trucks, or heavy-duty trucks for sale by the entity were produced in the United States, (4) during the preceding taxable year, did not transfer production outside of the United States of any automobile or automobile component manufactured in the United States, (5) during the preceding taxable year, with respect to all applicable individuals, offered— (A) coverage for the applicable individual under a group health plan in the platinum level of coverage (as described in section 1302(d)(1)(D) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(d)(1)(D))) or a higher level of coverage, and (B) participation in a defined benefit plan or defined contribution plan that meets the applicable requirement of subsection (e), (6) during the preceding taxable year, with respect to all retired individuals who, prior to retirement, were applicable individuals, offered coverage for the retired individual under a group health plan in the platinum level of coverage (as described in section 1302(d)(1)(D) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(d)(1)(D))) or a higher level of coverage, (7) with respect to every $1,000,000,000 distributed as non-recurring dividends, or in stock which was redeemed (within the meaning of section 317(b)), by such entity during such taxable year, provided not less than $2,000 to each applicable individual through a profit-sharing plan, with such amount to be in addition to any prior commitment made by the entity pursuant to an existing profit-sharing plan, as determined as of the date of such distribution or redemption, and (8) maintained a neutral position during the preceding taxable year— (A) in any labor organization organizing effort, and (B) with respect to the exercise of employees and labor organizations of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.). (c) Eligible wages.— (1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this section, the term “eligible wages” means any wages paid or incurred by a qualifying taxpayer during the taxable year to any applicable individual, provided that the wages paid to such individual during such taxable year are not less than the 75th percentile of wages paid for the occupation of the individual (as designated in accordance with the Standard Occupational Classification System) with respect to the applicable 4-digit industry group code of the North American Industry Classification System.
- (2) LIMITATION.—The amount of wages which may be taken into account under subsection (a)(1) with respect to any applicable individual shall not exceed $150,000 per taxable year.
201. Repeal of multipollutant emissions standards for light-duty and medium-duty vehicles Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section repeals a regulation set by the Environmental Protection Agency that established emissions standards for cars and trucks starting from the 2027 model year, meaning these standards will no longer be enforced.
202. Repeal of phase 3 heavy-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section nullifies the Environmental Protection Agency's "Phase 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles" rule, which means the rule will no longer be legally effective.
203. Repeal of CAFE standards rules Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section repeals the rules made by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration regarding fuel economy standards for certain vehicles from 2027 onwards, meaning those rules will no longer be valid or enforced.
301. Elimination of vehicle emissions waivers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that no more waivers will be granted for vehicle emission standards that differ from federal standards, revokes past waivers including those given to California for zero-emission vehicles, and repeals a section of the Clean Air Act.
401. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section defines key terms such as "Administrator" for the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, "CAFE standards" for fuel economy requirements, "greenhouse gas emissions" for certain climate-changing gases, and "Secretary" for the head of Transportation.
402. Establishment of CAFE standards and greenhouse gas emissions standards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the establishment of new fuel-efficiency (CAFE) and greenhouse gas emissions standards for cars and light trucks for the years 2027 to 2035. The standards must be feasible and economically practical, with input from industry experts, and are subject to revision based on progress reports, while existing 2025 standards will remain in place if deadlines are not met.
403. Compliance with fleet average carbon dioxide emissions standards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Manufacturers are considered in compliance with greenhouse gas emissions and fuel economy standards if they meet either the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards or the fleet-average greenhouse gas emissions standards, even if they achieve this by paying penalties or purchasing credits. This rule applies to their vehicles for a specific model year, covering both passenger and non-passenger vehicles, as well as work trucks.
404. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 404, the bill authorizes the allocation of necessary funds to implement the provisions outlined in this part of the legislation and any changes it introduces.
411. Establishment of heavy-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes new greenhouse gas emissions standards for heavy-duty vehicles by the Environmental Protection Agency, set to begin no earlier than the 2027 model year. These standards must consider technological feasibility, economic impacts, and involve consultation with various stakeholders, while interim standards for earlier models align with existing regulations from 2016.