Overview

Title

To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from sending petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to China, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill is like a rule that says "no selling oil from America's stash to China," so the United States keeps its oil safe and away from places it doesn't trust.

Summary AI

H. R. 2806 proposes legislation to prevent the U.S. Secretary of Energy from selling petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to entities connected to the Chinese government. The bill ensures that these petroleum products are not sold to any business influenced by the Chinese Communist Party and prohibits the export of such products to China. This measure aims to enhance the security and integrity of the United States' strategic petroleum reserves by limiting potential foreign influence.

Published

2025-04-09
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-04-09
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2806ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
303
Pages:
2
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 117
Verbs: 13
Adjectives: 6
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 6
Entities: 40

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.07
Average Sentence Length:
43.29
Token Entropy:
4.38
Readability (ARI):
22.64

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The bill titled "Protecting America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve from China Act" was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on April 9, 2025. The main objective of this legislation is to restrict the Secretary of Energy from selling petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to any entity associated with the Chinese Communist Party or to any entity that would subsequently export these products to China. The bill seeks to ensure that the U.S.'s strategic energy reserves are protected from entities that could potentially use these resources against American interests.

Significant Issues

Several notable issues arise from the provisions of this bill. Firstly, the bill's language does not clearly define what is meant by entities "under the ownership, control, or influence of the Chinese Communist Party." This lack of specificity could cause enforcement challenges and lead to ambiguity regarding which entities are prohibited from obtaining petroleum products.

Secondly, the bill does not outline mechanisms for verifying that petroleum products sold are not exported to China. This gap could make it difficult to effectively enforce the prohibition, as there is no system in place to monitor or verify compliance with this condition.

Finally, the phrase "Notwithstanding any other provision of law" is used broadly. While this aims to ensure the bill's directives stand above conflicting laws, it may unintentionally create legal issues if it clashes with existing legislation, leading to potential ambiguities in legal interpretation.

Potential Impact on the Public

For the general public, this bill represents an attempt to safeguard national energy resources and maintain energy security by ensuring that strategic reserves are not easily accessed by foreign entities that may not align with U.S. interests. The intent is to protect domestic interests and prevent a situation where energy resources might be leveraged for geopolitical purposes against the U.S.

However, the implementation and enforcement of this bill without clear definitions and monitoring mechanisms might lead to inefficiencies. If enforcement is inconsistent, the desired outcomes of maintaining strategic reserves might not be fully realized.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

From a governmental standpoint, agencies involved in energy management and national security could face increased responsibilities to more closely monitor and enforce the provisions of this bill. Without clear guidelines, these agencies might encounter challenges in determining compliant entities and ensuring that petroleum exports do not reach China.

For businesses involved in the trading and selling of petroleum products, especially those with international operations, this bill may impose additional compliance burdens. They would need to ensure that their transactions align with the specified restrictions, possibly requiring enhanced transparency and accountability measures.

Conversely, allies and partners of the U.S. who trade in energy markets might view this legislation as a positive step, as it suggests a firm stance against potentially adversarial uses of critical resources. Overall, while the bill aims to protect national interests, its success will largely depend on the clarity of its provisions and the robustness of its enforcement mechanisms.

Issues

  • The lack of a clear definition for 'under the ownership, control, or influence of the Chinese Communist Party' in Section 2 could lead to ambiguity and difficulties in enforcement, potentially impacting the effectiveness of the prohibition.

  • Section 2 does not provide mechanisms or procedures for verifying compliance with the condition that petroleum products sold will not be exported to China. This absence may lead to enforcement challenges and potential loopholes that could allow for non-compliance.

  • The use of 'Notwithstanding any other provision of law' in Section 2 is broad and could unintentionally conflict with existing laws, potentially leading to legal ambiguities and complications in the enforcement of this bill.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 1 of the bill states that it can be officially called the "Protecting America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve from China Act."

2. Prohibition on sales of petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to China Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits the sale of petroleum products from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve to any entity controlled by the Chinese Communist Party or if the products are to be exported to China.