Overview

Title

To direct the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating to study and report to the Congress regarding recreational vessel operator training.

ELI5 AI

The Brianna Lieneck Boating Safety Act of 2025 wants to make sure people driving boats know what they're doing, so it asks a special person in charge to study different ways of teaching boat drivers and tell Congress all about it. This will help keep boaters safe when they're out having fun on the water.

Summary AI

The Brianna Lieneck Boating Safety Act of 2025 (H.R. 2772) mandates that the Secretary of the department overseeing the Coast Guard conducts a study and presents a report to Congress about training programs for recreational vessel operators. This study will review various training programs, including those provided by the Coast Guard Auxiliary, State boating education programs, and hands-on training options. The report will also cover topics such as course materials, training methods, and how well the programs address risks faced by recreational boaters. Additionally, it will analyze how Federal and State programs can work together, and provide recommendations on mandatory education and testing for boaters.

Published

2025-04-09
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-04-09
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2772ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
684
Pages:
4
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 234
Verbs: 50
Adjectives: 28
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 25
Entities: 60

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.57
Average Sentence Length:
68.40
Token Entropy:
4.70
Readability (ARI):
37.78

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

H.R. 2772, titled the "Brianna Lieneck Boating Safety Act of 2025," is a legislative proposal focused on enhancing the safety and education standards for recreational vessel operators. The bill mandates the Secretary of the department that oversees the U.S. Coast Guard to conduct a comprehensive study and present a report to Congress. This report is set to assess the current status of boating education and training programs across the United States. The ultimate goal is to harmonize state and potential federal training efforts, ensuring consistent and effective safety protocols for recreational boaters nationwide.

Significant Issues

One of the primary concerns with this bill is the ambitious timeline specified for the completion of the study and report. The bill requires the report to be finalized within 180 days of enactment. Given the broad scope of topics to be covered, this timeline may not provide sufficient time for a thorough analysis, which could potentially lead to oversight or incomplete findings.

Another significant issue highlighted is the lack of a specified budget or funding source. Conducting such an extensive study and compiling a detailed report demands resources. Without allocated funding, there is a risk of underfunding, which might necessitate reallocating existing resources that could impact other Coast Guard functions.

The bill also strictly defines content areas for the report, which might hinder the exploration of other valuable insights. This specificity could potentially constrain the analysis to predetermined areas, risking the exclusion of pertinent aspects of boating safety that could arise during the study.

Furthermore, the examination of existing state programs could lead to redundancy, as many programs are already documented by specialized bodies like the National Association of State Boating Law Administrators (NASBLA). Lastly, while the bill approaches the idea of allowing experienced boaters to bypass mandatory courses, it lacks a detailed framework for implementation, potentially causing inconsistencies across states.

Impact on the General Public

For the general boating public, the legislation aims to enhance safety through improved education and training standards. By potentially implementing a more standardized approach to boating safety, recreational vessel operators might benefit from a clearer understanding of best practices and safety protocols, potentially reducing the incidence of boating accidents.

However, if not managed carefully, the mandates from this bill could lead to rushed policy decisions or fragmented standards that vary significantly state by state, which could confuse boaters rather than streamline and unify recreational boating education efforts.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

State governments and agencies responsible for boating programs will likely experience increased pressure to align with new standards suggested by this federal initiative. This could mean additional administrative efforts and financial resources to comply with new regulations and recommendations coming from the report.

For the Coast Guard, this bill could result in increased administrative responsibilities without additional funding, pressuring them to balance this new mandate with their existing duties. Additionally, organizations like NASBLA may need to collaborate more closely with federal agencies to ensure that existing documentation and research are utilized effectively.

Experienced boaters may welcome the proposed option to bypass mandatory courses if they can directly prove their competency through testing. However, without a standardized exemption framework, they might encounter a patchwork of differing state rules that complicate interstate boating activities.

Overall, while the intentions of the Brianna Lieneck Boating Safety Act of 2025 are clear and valuable in promoting boating safety, careful consideration and execution are crucial to avoid unintended consequences and to ensure productive outcomes from this legislative initiative.

Issues

  • The requirement for the Secretary to study and report on various aspects of recreational vessel operator training within 180 days (Section 2) may be overly ambitious given the potential scope and complexity of the study, possibly leading to rushed or incomplete findings, impacting the credibility and utility of the report.

  • The lack of a specified budget or funding source for conducting the study and generating the report in Section 2 raises concerns about potential underfunding or necessary reallocation of existing resources, potentially affecting other Coast Guard operations.

  • Mandated content areas for the report (Section 2) are very specific, which could limit the ability of the Secretary to provide valuable insights or findings falling outside the specified areas, possibly missing important aspects of boating safety.

  • The directive to analyze the potential for a Federal training and testing program harmonization with State programs in Section 2(c)(6) may require significant coordination efforts, potentially leading to lengthy delays and increased administrative costs.

  • The study of existing State programs, as mandated by Section 2(a)(2), might result in overlap or redundancy, since these programs and their effectiveness are likely already documented by NASBLA and other relevant bodies.

  • The lack of a detailed framework for experienced boaters to bypass mandatory education courses (Section 2(c)(9) and 2(c)(10)) could lead to inconsistencies in implementation across different States.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act states that it will be officially known as the “Brianna Lieneck Boating Safety Act of 2025”.

2. Recreational vessel operator education and training Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Secretary of the department where the Coast Guard operates to study and report on recreational vessel operator education and training within 180 days of its enactment. The report will cover existing training programs, review course contents and methods, evaluate states' ability to unify their programs, and consider possible federal and state program harmonization, including recommendations for mandatory training, testing, and exemptions for experienced boaters.