Overview
Title
To require the Department of Defense to use information and communications technology products obtained from original equipment manufacturers or authorized resellers, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants the military to buy computer and communications gadgets only from trusted companies to keep everything safe, but it has some rules that might make it a bit tricky and expensive.
Summary AI
H.R. 2765, titled the "Securing America’s Federal Equipment Supply Chains Act" or the "SAFE Supply Chains Act," aims to require the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to procure information and communications technology products only from original manufacturers or authorized resellers. The bill introduces a ban on using products from unauthorized sources but allows for exceptions if necessary for valid scientific research or critical missions. It establishes guidelines for vendor technical assistance and mandates annual reports to Congress on waiver usage. The act is set to take effect one year after its enactment without requiring additional funding.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, named the "Securing America’s Federal Equipment Supply Chains Act" or the "SAFE Supply Chains Act," mandates that the Department of Defense (DoD) only obtain information and communications technology (ICT) products from original equipment manufacturers or authorized resellers. There are exceptions, such as waivers permitted for scientific research or when mission-critical functions could be jeopardized. The bill also sets forth guidelines to aid vendors in becoming authorized resellers and requires annual reports on waiver usage to be submitted to Congress.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several critical issues emerge from this legislation. Firstly, the waiver process could potentially become a loophole, allowing non-compliant vendors to provide ICT products if the criteria for granting waivers are not rigidly enforced. This risks diluting the intended stringent procurement standards. Additionally, the bill's prohibition on purchasing products from entities other than authorized manufacturers and resellers may limit market competition, which could lead to higher costs and reduced innovation.
Another issue is the complexity of definitions, such as what constitutes an "authorized reseller" or a "covered product," which could create confusion and discourage new vendors from entering the government contracting market. This might impact the diversity and resilience of the defense supply chain. Furthermore, the requirement for annual reports to Congress could become a bureaucratic burden, potentially hampering efficient operations within the DoD.
Broad Public Impact
The general public has a vested interest in securing the defense supply chain to protect national security. However, the potential limitations on competition resulting from this bill could lead to increased taxpayer costs for ICT products, as reduced supplier options typically encourage higher prices. If the process for becoming an authorized vendor is considered overly complex or restrictive, it might further concentrate market power among a few companies, potentially impacting innovation and technology advancement in the long run.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For the Department of Defense, the requirement to procure ICT products strictly from designated manufacturers or resellers aims to bolster security, protecting against foreign interference and ensuring reliable supply chains. Nonetheless, reallocating existing resources to enforce compliance due to the lack of additional funds could strain DoD operations and affect efficiency.
For vendors, especially smaller or newer companies, the complexities around becoming authorized resellers might create barriers to entry into defense contracting, negatively affecting market diversity. Established companies that meet the legislation's criteria could see benefits from decreased competition, possibly leading to increased sales and influence over DoD procurement.
Overall, while the SAFE Supply Chains Act aims to solidify the security and integrity of defense procurements, careful monitoring and implementation of the waiver process and vendor support will be critical in ensuring the legislation does not inadvertently hamper innovation or efficiency.
Issues
The waiver process outlined in subsection (c) of SEC. 2 could be exploited, allowing for procurement from non-compliant vendors. This creates potential security risks, especially if security mitigations and plans are not thoroughly scrutinized. This aspect might impact the general public, given the importance of ensuring the defense procurement process is secure and free from foreign influence.
Subsection (b) introduces a broad prohibition on the procurement of IT products from sources other than original equipment manufacturers or authorized resellers. This could limit market competition and possibly increase costs or reduce innovation in technology procurement, potentially affecting taxpayers and government procurement processes.
The lack of new funds mentioned in subsection (f) suggests existing resources must be reallocated to ensure compliance. This could strain current operations or limit flexibility within the Department of Defense, potentially affecting efficiency and effectiveness in IT systems maintenance and procurement.
Subsection (e) requires annual reporting to Congress about waivers granted, which may become an administrative burden and result in increased bureaucracy. Efficient government operations are a matter of public interest, and excessive bureaucracy can affect transparency and efficiency.
The definition of 'authorized reseller' in subsection (a)(1) is complex and may create confusion, potentially discouraging new entities from participating in government contracts. This could reduce market diversity and innovation in government IT supply chains.
The ambiguity in the definition of 'covered product' in subsection (a)(2), especially regarding what constitutes the primary function for certain hardware, may lead to confusion or misclassification, potentially affecting compliance and enforcement of the statutory requirements.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section establishes the short title of the act, which is called the “Securing America’s Federal Equipment Supply Chains Act” or simply the “SAFE Supply Chains Act.”
2. Agency use of IT products Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines rules for the Department of Defense regarding the purchase of certain technology products, requiring that they be bought from original manufacturers or authorized dealers unless a waiver is granted for research or mission-critical purposes. It also mandates setting up guidelines to assist potential vendors in becoming authorized resellers and requires annual reports to Congress on the waivers issued.