Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand, and make permanent certain modifications of, the earned income credit.
ELI5 AI
The bill H.R. 2764 is like when you get more allowance money for doing chores. It wants to give some people more help on their tax returns, like making it easier to get a bigger tax break, even if they worked less last year, and it also includes people in faraway places like Puerto Rico.
Summary AI
The bill H. R. 2764, titled the "Tax Cut for Workers Act of 2025," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to make permanent changes to the earned income tax credit. It lowers the minimum age at which individuals without qualifying children can receive the credit, increases both the credit amounts and phaseout limits, and removes the maximum age cap. Additionally, the bill allows individuals to use their previous year's earned income to calculate the credit if it results in a larger benefit and extends the credit's availability to U.S. territories such as Puerto Rico and American Samoa.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Tax Cut for Workers Act of 2025," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the earned income tax credit (EITC) and make certain modifications permanent. The bill includes provisions to lower the minimum age requirement, eliminate the maximum age limit, increase credit and phaseout percentages, and adjust income thresholds for inflation. It also permits taxpayers to elect to use their previous year's earned income for credit calculation if it provides a more favorable outcome. Additionally, the bill extends the application of EITC provisions to U.S. territories more permanently than before.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the critical issues is the removal of the maximum age limit for EITC eligibility, which could increase government expenditure without detailed budgetary impact projections. Additionally, increasing credit and phaseout percentages could have substantial effects on government finances, yet the bill does not address these potential impacts.
The use of complex tax-related language could hinder public understanding and accessibility. There are also concerns about potential inconsistencies in interpretation due to the need for additional guidance on newly defined terms such as "qualified former foster youth" and "qualified homeless youth."
Furthermore, the legislation introduces provisions that allow for previous year's income to be used for credit determination, which, while potentially beneficial, may be susceptible to manipulation. The legal text lacks detailed mechanisms for checking this potential abuse.
The bill's amendments to extend EITC applicability to U.S. territories without time frame limitations raise questions about the provision's permanence and its long-term fiscal effects on these regions.
Impact on the Public
The bill could broadly impact the public by providing more significant tax credits to a more comprehensive range of taxpayers, including younger and older adults who were previously excluded. This move could provide increased financial assistance to low-income workers, potentially stimulating economic activities by increasing the disposable income of these households.
However, the changes could also lead to increased administrative costs and complexity, as both taxpayers and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may require new guidance to navigate these adjustments. The potential for misuse and errors also poses risks that could complicate tax filing processes for individuals.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Low-Income Workers: The bill could positively impact low-income workers by reducing their tax burden and increasing their take-home pay. The expanded EITC could especially benefit young adults and senior citizens who were previously ineligible due to age restrictions.
Students and Youths: Enhanced qualifications for former foster youth and homeless youth could provide crucial support to these vulnerable groups. However, the need for certifications and consents might introduce barriers if not adequately addressed.
Government Budget: The bill could lead to potential revenue shortfalls due to higher credits and the removal of age caps. Without clear budgetary impact assessments, the government's financial planning might face challenges, potentially affecting other public programs.
IRS and Tax Preparers: These entities may experience an increased workload due to the complexities introduced in the tax code. Ensuring effective implementation and monitoring would require additional administrative resources and precise regulatory guidance.
Residents of U.S. Territories: While the removal of calendar year limitations could provide sustained financial relief for these regions, the lack of a clear, permanent framework for the EITC's applicability might affect long-term fiscal planning and economic stability in these areas.
In summary, the "Tax Cut for Workers Act of 2025" aims to extend financial aid to a broader segment of the population through tax credits but faces various significant issues concerning fiscal impacts, administrative complexity, and potential misuse that need careful consideration.
Financial Assessment
The bill H.R. 2764 includes significant adjustments to the U.S. tax code, particularly concerning the earned income tax credit. This commentary will focus on the financial aspects of these adjustments and the issues that may arise as a result.
Increased Earned Income and Phaseout Amounts
One of the significant changes proposed by the bill is the increase in the earned income and phaseout amounts. Specifically, the bill proposes amending the figures in the Internal Revenue Code by striking out "$4,220" and replacing it with "$9,820", and by striking out "$5,280" and replacing it with "$11,610". This substantial increase aims to expand financial support for individuals eligible for the earned income credit, particularly those without qualifying children.
However, this increase could also have notable budgetary implications. By expanding the amounts eligible for the credit, the government may see a reduction in tax revenue, as more individuals could qualify for bigger tax credits. The bill does not provide clear projections on how this change might affect the federal budget, which raises concerns outlined in the issues section regarding the potential financial impact of this change on government spending.
Inflation Adjustments
The bill includes a provision for inflation adjustments, affecting the earned income credit by ensuring that these amounts increase in line with inflation. This is done by adjusting the dollar amounts using a specified percentage based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The implementation of these adjustments using varying base years contributes to the complexity of the tax code and may introduce ambiguity, as different dollar amounts are tied to different base years. This complexity is flagged as a potential issue, as it might make the tax code more challenging for taxpayers and professionals to navigate.
Removal of Maximum Age and Election to Use Prior Year's Income
The removal of the maximum age cap for eligibility could potentially result in more individuals becoming eligible for the credit. Without clear budgetary forecasts, this change might lead to increased government spending. Similarly, the provision allowing taxpayers to use a prior year's earned income for credit calculations broadens eligibility for receiving a larger credit in times of fluctuating income. However, this presents a risk for misuse or manipulation, which could further impact government revenue if not appropriately monitored, as highlighted in the issues section.
Application to U.S. Territories
Changes extending the earned income credit to U.S. territories, such as Puerto Rico and American Samoa, have been proposed by eliminating previous calendar year restrictions. While this could provide much-needed support to residents in these areas, the absence of a detailed impact assessment raises questions about long-term fiscal implications. The lack of specified duration for these amendments adds to the uncertainty regarding their financial impact, potentially complicating fiscal planning for both the U.S. government and the territories themselves.
Conclusion
The financial changes proposed in H.R. 2764 involve significant revisions to the earned income tax credit structure, with potential budgetary implications. While these measures aim to aid low-income workers and expand support, their complexity and potential for increasing government expenditure underscore the necessity for careful consideration and transparent financial impact assessments.
Issues
The removal of the maximum age for eligibility for the earned income credit could lead to increased government spending without clear projections of its budgetary impact, as mentioned in Section 2.
The increase in credit and phaseout percentages in Section 2 could significantly impact government budgets due to potential revenue loss or gain, with no mention of the financial implications.
The use of complex tax terminology in Sections 2 and 4 (e.g., 'subparagraph', 'clause') may make the document challenging for those unfamiliar with tax law, potentially causing accessibility issues for the general public.
The definition and clarification requirements for terms like 'qualified former foster youth' and 'qualified homeless youth' in Section 2 require the Secretary to provide guidance, potentially leading to interpretation inconsistencies.
Provisions in Section 2 related to external certifications for qualified homeless youth might face execution challenges and need additional administrative resources, increasing complexity and government costs.
The inflation adjustment clause in Section 2 adds complexity to the tax code, possibly introducing ambiguity due to varying base years, per the different clauses provided.
Section 4's provision allowing an election to use prior year earned income could lead to manipulation or misuse, though it is intended to aid those with fluctuating incomes.
Section 4 lacks specifics regarding monitoring mechanisms or checks to prevent potential abuse of the election to use the prior year's earned income.
The amendments in Section 3 changing the applicability of earned income credit to U.S. possessions lack clear rationale or impact assessment, which may cause fiscal implications or misunderstandings in these regions.
The removal of calendar year limitations in Section 3 for the application of earned income credit to U.S. possessions introduces ambiguity about the duration of these amendments, potentially affecting long-term fiscal planning.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the official name of the act is the “Tax Cut for Workers Act of 2025.”
2. Permanent extension of earned income credit rules for individuals without qualifying children Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section makes several changes to the earned income tax credit (EITC) rules for people without qualifying children by lowering the minimum age to 19 (or 18 for certain foster or homeless youth), removing the maximum age limit, increasing credit and phaseout percentages, raising earned income limits, and applying inflation adjustments to these amounts. These changes will take effect for tax years starting after December 31, 2025.
Money References
- (d) Increase in earned income and phaseout amounts.—The table contained in subparagraph (A) of section 32(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) by striking “$4,220” and inserting “$9,820”, and (2) by striking “$5,280” and inserting “$11,610”.
- — (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 32(j) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: “(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable year beginning after— “(A) 2021, in the case of the dollar amount in subsection (i)(1), “(B) 2026, in the case of the dollar amounts in the third row of the table in subsection (b)(2)(A), and “(C) 2015, in any other case, each of the dollar amounts in subsections (b)(2) and (i)(1) shall be increased by an amount equal to the inflation amount.”. (2) INFLATION AMOUNT.—Subsection (j) of section 32 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: “(3) INFLATION AMOUNT.—For purposes of paragraph (1), the inflation amount with respect to any dollar amount for any taxable year is the amount equal to— “(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by “(B) the percentage (if any) by which— “(i) the CPI (as defined in section 1(f)(4)) for the calendar year preceding the year in which the taxable year begins, exceeds “(ii) the CPI (as so defined) for— “(I) in the case of amounts in the third row of the table in subsection (b)(2)(A), 2025, “(II) in the case of any other amount in subsection (b)(2)(A), 1995, “(III) in the case of the $5,000 amount in subsection (b)(2)(B), 2008, and “(IV) in the case of the $10,000 amount in subsection (i)(1), 2020.”.
3. Application of earned income credit to possessions of the United States Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by removing specific references to the years 2021 through 2025 in connection with applying the earned income tax credit to Puerto Rico, other U.S. territories with a mirror code tax system, and American Samoa.
4. Election to use prior year earned income Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Internal Revenue Code allows taxpayers, starting from the 2026 tax year, to use their earned income from the previous year to calculate their tax credit if it was higher than their current year's earned income. This option is available to joint filers, and any errors made in this election will be treated as simple mathematical mistakes.