Overview

Title

To provide enhanced funding for family planning services.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 2762 is a plan to give more money to places that help families learn about having kids and staying healthy, with lots of money each year to fix up their buildings and help them do their jobs better, but they need to be careful to spend it wisely and offer all kinds of information to families.

Summary AI

H. R. 2762, titled the "Expanding Access to Family Planning Act," aims to increase funding for family planning services through the creation of a Title X Clinic Fund. The bill proposes allocating $512 million each year from 2026 to 2035 for grants and contracts under Title X of the Public Health Service Act, and an additional $50 million annually for infrastructure improvements of Title X clinics. It also stipulates that clinics receiving these funds must provide nondirective counseling on prenatal care, adoption, and pregnancy termination options.

Published

2025-04-09
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-04-09
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2762ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
588
Pages:
3
Sentences:
17

Language

Nouns: 202
Verbs: 43
Adjectives: 26
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 16
Entities: 45

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.27
Average Sentence Length:
34.59
Token Entropy:
4.87
Readability (ARI):
19.41

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The bill at hand, known as the "Expanding Access to Family Planning Act," aims to enhance funding for family planning services in the United States. Legislated by members of the House of Representatives, it proposes the establishment of a Title X Clinic Fund, managed by the Department of Health and Human Services. This fund is designed to support clinics that offer family planning services, as defined under Title X of the Public Health Service Act, for fiscal years 2026 through 2035. The bill specifies that $512 million will be allocated annually for grants and contracts, and an additional $50 million will be set aside for clinic infrastructure needs, including construction and renovation.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several significant issues present themselves within the bill's provisions:

  1. Funding Concerns: The substantial annual funding allocations—$512 million for operational grants and $50 million for infrastructure—are not accompanied by explicit metrics or accountability measures. This opens the possibility of inefficient use of resources and potential wasteful spending.

  2. Management of Funds: The bill allows the appropriated funds to be available until fully expended. This lack of a sunset clause raises concerns about potential financial mismanagement or inefficient allocation over an extended period.

  3. Subaward Prohibition Clause: The clause intended to prevent discrimination in subawards lacks clarity, especially regarding how an entity's ability to provide Title X services will be assessed. This vagueness could lead to inconsistent enforcement and ambiguity in eligibility criteria.

  4. Pregnancy Counseling Language: The prescriptive nature of the language regarding nondirective pregnancy counseling might complicate the practical implementation of these services at Title X clinics, potentially making compliance challenging.

Impact on the Public

In a broad sense, the bill aims to bolster access to family planning resources, which can play a crucial role in public health outcomes. Increased funding for Title X clinics could improve the availability and quality of reproductive health services, benefiting individuals seeking family planning assistance across the nation. Enhanced clinic infrastructure could also mean better access to care for underserved communities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impacts

  • Patients: For individuals requiring family planning services, the enhanced funding could translate to better access to comprehensive and quality care. The attention to nondirective counseling ensures that options presented to patients are broad and unbiased, empowering them to make informed decisions about their reproductive health.

  • Healthcare Providers: Title X clinics may experience an increased capacity to serve patients, improving their ability to deliver essential services. The infrastructure funding could allow for advancements in clinic facilities, benefiting both staff and patients.

Negative Impacts

  • Fiscal Oversight Bodies: The substantial, unencumbered funding, combined with concerns over potential inefficiencies, may burden oversight bodies tasked with ensuring funds are used correctly. This could necessitate additional administrative resources to monitor the allocation and expenditure of funds.

  • Entities Competing for Funds: The vague criteria for subawards could create challenges for entities attempting to secure funding, leading to potential disparities in the distribution of resources.

In conclusion, while the "Expanding Access to Family Planning Act" has the potential to significantly enhance reproductive health services across the United States, careful consideration of its implementation and oversight measures will be crucial to realize its goals effectively.

Financial Assessment

The Expanding Access to Family Planning Act proposes significant financial allocations to support family planning services through the establishment of a Title X Clinic Fund. The bill outlines two primary categories of funding to achieve its objectives.

Summary of Financial Allocations

The bill allocates $512 million annually from fiscal years 2026 to 2035 for the purpose of grants and contracts under Title X of the Public Health Service Act. Additionally, it designates $50 million each year for infrastructure-related expenses, which include the construction and renovation of Title X clinics. These funds are appropriated from the Treasury from monies not otherwise allocated.

Relation to Identified Issues

One notable issue is the substantial size of these appropriations. The total funding amounts to $562 million annually, raising concerns about the absence of specific metrics to evaluate expected outcomes or accountability measures. This lack of clarity could potentially lead to wasteful spending if funds are not monitored properly for efficiency and effectiveness.

Another aspect relates to the clause stipulating that these funds "shall remain available until expended." This unrestricted availability could result in financial mismanagement or inefficient allocation of resources over time, as it does not set boundaries or timelines for fund usage, potentially prolonging project completions or enabling unnecessary expenditures.

Additionally, while the bill addresses conditions for funding, one such condition prohibits entities that receive funds from barring participation in subaward programs unless there is an inability to provide Title X services. However, the bill does not specify how such inability will be assessed. This lack of specificity may lead to inconsistent application of fund allocations and result in ambiguity regarding the eligibility of participating entities.

Finally, the financial references to nondirective counseling requirements could impose additional demands on Title X clinics. The complex and prescriptive language concerning counseling on various pregnancy options may complicate implementation and compliance, potentially affecting the efficient use of allocated funds for service delivery.

In summary, while the financial allocations proposed in the bill aim to enhance family planning services, they raise several concerns regarding accountability, management, and operational efficiency.

Issues

  • The funding appropriations in Section 2(b) are substantial, amounting to $512 million annually for grants and contracts and $50 million for infrastructure, without clear metrics on expected outcomes or accountability measures, raising concerns about potential wasteful spending.

  • The unrestricted availability of appropriated funds until expended, as stated in Section 2(c), could lead to financial mismanagement or inefficient allocation of resources over time.

  • The prohibition clause in Section 2(d)(1) lacks specificity on how entities' inability to provide Title X services will be evaluated, potentially leading to inconsistent application and ambiguity.

  • The language used in Section 2(d)(2) regarding pregnancy counseling may be overly complex and prescriptive, which could complicate implementation and compliance for Title X clinics.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that it can be referred to as the “Expanding Access to Family Planning Act.”

2. Title X Clinic Fund Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text establishes a Title X Clinic Fund to support clinics that provide family planning services for fiscal years 2026 to 2035, with $512 million for grants and contracts and $50 million for infrastructure needs. The fund has conditions, such as prohibiting subaward discrimination and requiring nondirective pregnancy counseling that presents patients with all options, including prenatal care, adoption, and termination, with referrals available upon request if desired by the patient.

Money References

  • (referred to in this section as “title X clinics”). (b) Funding.—There is appropriated to the Office of the Secretary for the Title X Clinic Fund, out of any monies in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2035— (1) $512,000,000 for necessary expenses for grants and contracts under title X of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300 et seq.); and (2) $50,000,000 for infrastructure, including the construction and renovation (including equipment) of title X clinics.