Overview
Title
To require the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to review any purchase or lease of real estate near a military installation or military airspace in the United States by a foreign person connected to or subsidized by the Russian Federation, the People’s Republic of China, the Islamic Republic of Iran, or the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 2754 is a bill that makes sure people from certain other countries like Russia, China, Iran, or North Korea can't buy or rent land near places where the U.S. military works, unless it's checked first to make sure it's safe. This is like making sure no strangers can play in your backyard unless a grown-up says it's okay.
Summary AI
H.R. 2754 is a bill that mandates the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to review any purchase or lease of real estate near military sites by foreign entities connected to Russia, China, Iran, or North Korea. It expands the definition of "covered transactions" to include these real estate deals within certain proximity of military installations and airspace. The bill also stipulates that energy project approvals must be delayed until CFIUS completes its review if the land involved is under scrutiny. This ensures such transactions don't pose a threat to U.S. national security.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, titled the "Protecting Military Installations and Ranges Act of 2025," aims to increase oversight over real estate transactions involving foreign entities near U.S. military installations or airspace. Specifically, it mandates that the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) reviews any such deals involving individuals or entities connected to or subsidized by the governments of Russia, China, Iran, or North Korea. Additionally, it places restrictions on energy project approvals related to ongoing CFIUS reviews.
General Summary of the Bill
This legislation mandates a rigorous review process for real estate transactions near U.S. military locations involving foreign entities tied to specific foreign governments. It expands the scope of what is considered a "covered transaction," requiring CFIUS to actively review and monitor these deals. Moreover, the bill sets conditions on approval processes for energy projects when they're linked to real estate transactions under CFIUS scrutiny. The goal is to ensure national security by scrutinizing foreign involvement near sensitive military areas.
Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the text and structure of the bill. First, it lacks clear definitions for what constitutes acting "for or on behalf of" a foreign government, which could lead to enforcement ambiguities. Similarly, criteria for determining if a foreign person receives subsidies from the concerning governments are not outlined. This vagueness can pose challenges in consistent application and open doors for exploitation.
The bill heavily relies on cross-references to existing U.S. Code sections without providing summaries, creating potential confusion for those unfamiliar with these legal frameworks. Additionally, there is a possibility for indefinite delays in energy project approvals because no timeframes are stipulated for CFIUS reviews. Delays could lead to financial and economic consequences for investments tied to these projects.
Potential Broad Impact on the Public
The bill could broadly affect the public by enhancing national security measures. By introducing stringent reviews of foreign real estate transactions near military sites, it aims to prevent espionage or other security threats. Such oversight could provide a sense of safety and stability to the public knowing that near-sensitive military locations, foreign influence is vigilantly monitored.
However, the bill's potential to cause delays in energy projects may indirectly impact energy availability or prices, which could influence public utility costs.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Military and Defense Sector: The legislation directly benefits this sector by ensuring that properties critical to national security remain safeguarded from potentially hostile foreign control. It provides a mechanism to prevent foreign entities from gaining real estate footholds that could be used for espionage or other security breaches.
Foreign Investors and Real Estate Sector: These stakeholders might view the bill negatively due to the increased scrutiny and potential delays in transaction approvals, particularly if the criteria for reviews are perceived as unclear or subjectively enforced.
Energy Sector: Energy companies could experience significant project delays, causing disruptions in project timelines and financial planning. This could have further implications for energy infrastructure development and operational costs.
Government Agencies: Agencies involved will face an increased administrative burden, needing to coordinate and communicate effectively regarding reviews and approvals. This may necessitate additional resources or restructuring to manage the new tasks effectively.
In conclusion, while the bill's goals are rooted in national security interests, its success will depend on addressing the issues of legal clarity and efficient process implementation. Failing to do so may result in unintended negative consequences for certain stakeholders and potentially diminish its positive impacts.
Issues
The bill does not specify clear criteria for what constitutes acting 'for or on behalf of' a foreign government, as mentioned in Section 2. This could lead to enforcement ambiguities and inconsistent application, which is a significant legal issue.
In Section 2, the criteria for determining if a foreign person receives 'subsidies from' the listed governments (Russia, China, Iran, North Korea) are not defined, potentially leading to inconsistent application. This vagueness can be exploited or result in subjective interpretations.
The bill heavily relies on cross-references to other U.S. Code sections without summarizing their implications, as seen in Section 3. This could lead to ambiguity for individuals not familiar with these references, highlighting a legal accessibility issue.
Section 3 creates potential for indefinite delays in energy project approvals due to the lack of guidelines for how long the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States can take to conclude its review. This raises significant financial and economic concerns due to potential investments being delayed.
The amendment requirements for certifications to Congress in Section 2 introduce additional complexity. While aiming for oversight, this could be streamlined for efficiency to avoid bureaucratic delays affecting decision-making processes.
There is little transparency about the interaction and communication processes between the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Transportation, and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, as noted in Section 3. A lack of open communication protocols poses a risk to organized policy enforcement.
The language describing geographic distances from military installations and areas in Section 2 is complex and could be simplified for better clarity. This affects both legal interpretation and public understanding.
The bill does not address potential financial implications or administrative burdens due to delays caused by pending reviews from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, as detailed in Section 3. These unforeseen costs are significant for stakeholders and public funds.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill establishes that the official title of the Act is the “Protecting Military Installations and Ranges Act of 2025”.
2. Review by Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States of real estate purchases or leases near military installations or military airspace Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill requires that the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States review real estate deals involving foreign individuals near U.S. military sites, specifically if these individuals are connected with governments like Russia, China, Iran, or North Korea. It makes sure that these transactions are mandatorily reviewed and informs relevant Congress members about them.
3. Limitation on approval of energy projects related to reviews conducted by Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines restrictions on the approval of energy projects by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Transportation if the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States is reviewing a related property transaction. The Secretary of Defense must delay the project review until the Committee concludes its action and notify the Secretary of Transportation, who also cannot make determinations on the project until specific conditions are met.