Overview
Title
To amend the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 to add certain land to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to add some more land to a special nature area in Colorado, where people can go and enjoy nature without anyone changing it. It also lets Native American tribes use the land in their traditional ways and says some of the trees can be looked after to keep them healthy.
Summary AI
H. R. 2734 aims to amend the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 by adding approximately 6,817 acres of land within the Routt National Forest to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness. This newly added area is to be known as the "Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition." The bill allows the Secretary of Agriculture to manage this land for fire, insect, and disease control and permits Indian Tribes to use the land for traditional purposes, without affecting any treaty rights.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Sarvis Creek Wilderness Completion Act" aims to update the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 to incorporate additional land into the Sarvis Creek Wilderness area. Specifically, it proposes the inclusion of about 6,817 acres within the Routt National Forest, enhancing the designated protected areas under federal wilderness management.
General Summary
This bill, titled the "Sarvis Creek Wilderness Completion Act," was introduced in the House of Representatives. It seeks to expand the Sarvis Creek Wilderness area by adding land from the Routt National Forest. The proposal identifies specific land to be included, although a detailed map showing precise boundaries is not part of the text provided to the public. The bill also outlines the administrative roles, stating that the Secretary of Agriculture will oversee the newly added land. Moreover, it touches upon the rights and uses concerning Indigenous tribes and provides guidelines for land maintenance activities like fire control.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several significant issues arise from this bill. Firstly, the exact location of the land proposed for wilderness designation within the Routt National Forest is not specified in detail, which may lead to management issues. The alteration of previously enacted laws necessitates clear integration with existing frameworks to avoid legal complexities. Additionally, the absence of financial planning concerning the management of this expanded land could lead to budgetary constraints.
Another concern is related to the administrative powers granted to the Secretary of Agriculture, which lack specific guidelines. This could result in inconsistent management decisions. The terms outlining tribal access for traditional uses are also vaguely defined, which may lead to differing interpretations and potential conflicts regarding Indigenous rights.
Impact on the Public
The bill's passage could potentially increase recreational opportunities due to expanded wilderness areas which often become popular for activities such as hiking and camping. However, without precise boundary definitions, ambiguity might affect local stakeholders, including environmental and community groups. Additionally, the absence of explicit funding plans to manage the added land might divert resources from other public services or environmental efforts.
Stakeholder Impact
For stakeholders such as the residents near the Routt National Forest, this expansion could bring both positive and negative effects. On one hand, it might stimulate local economies through eco-tourism. On the other hand, insufficiently defined management practices may lead to conflicts or environmental degradation.
Indigenous communities could benefit from the recognition of their rights to access the wilderness area for cultural and traditional practices. However, the lack of clarity regarding "traditional, religious, and cultural purposes" poses the risk of misinterpretation, possibly leading to disputes over land use rights.
Overall, while the bill could achieve environmental conservation goals and recognize tribal rights, its ambiguities and lack of detailed provisions may create challenges in implementation and stakeholder satisfaction.
Issues
The 'Designation of Sarvis Creek Wilderness addition' section does not specify the exact location within the Routt National Forest, providing only a general description. This could lead to ambiguities in managing or enforcing the wilderness designation, potentially impacting both legal clarity and local stakeholders. [Section 3]
The amendment involves altering previously enacted legislation, which may require further clarification on how it interacts with existing laws and management plans. This lack of clarity could result in legal disputes or challenges. [Section 3]
The map entitled 'Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition Proposal' is referenced but not included, complicating the understanding of the precise boundaries and impact of the amendment, which may lead to future disputes or confusion among the public and officials. [Section 3]
There is no mention of funding or resources needed to manage the additional wilderness area, which may result in unanticipated fiscal impacts and strain on current management capabilities. [Section 3]
The provision allowing the Secretary to determine terms and conditions for controlling fire, insects, and diseases is vague and could lead to discretion being exercised without clear guidelines, possibly resulting in inconsistent or biased decision-making. This issue is significant as it pertains to environmental management and governmental oversight. [Section 4]
The term 'traditional, religious, and cultural purposes' for which Indian Tribes may use the Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition is not clearly defined, potentially leading to interpretative disputes or varying applications. This ambiguity is significant as it involves rights and interests of Indigenous communities. [Section 4]
The mention of 'applicable law' without specifying which laws could lead to ambiguity in understanding which specific legal frameworks are being referenced for permitting tribal access, affecting clarity and legal compliance. [Section 4]
There is no mention of any oversight or accountability measures for the activities carried out by the Secretary in relation to fire, insects, and diseases, which could result in unchecked actions and potential misuse of power. [Section 4]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the official name of the legislation is the “Sarvis Creek Wilderness Completion Act.”
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, two terms are defined: "Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition" refers to the land added to the Sarvis Wilderness by a specific amendment, and "Secretary" refers to the Secretary of Agriculture.
3. Designation of Sarvis Creek Wilderness addition Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 adds about 6,817 acres of land in the Routt National Forest to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness. The law clarifies that the reference date for this addition will be the date when the new act is enacted.
4. Administrative provisions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that nothing in the act changes the treaty rights of Indian Tribes and that the Secretary can allow these tribes to use the Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition for traditional, religious, and cultural activities. It also states that the Secretary is allowed to take necessary actions to manage fire, insects, and diseases in the area, based on their judgment.