Overview
Title
To amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to the scheduling of fentanyl-related substances, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 27, called the "HALT Fentanyl Act," is a new rule to help control a very dangerous drug called fentanyl by making more types of it illegal, but it still lets scientists study it safely.
Summary AI
H. R. 27, titled the "Halt All Lethal Trafficking of Fentanyl Act" or "HALT Fentanyl Act," seeks to amend the Controlled Substances Act focusing on the classification and control of fentanyl-related substances. The bill proposes adding some fentanyl-like substances to the Schedule I category, ensuring strict legal control over them, while also streamlining the registration process for researchers conducting studies on these substances under certain conditions. It aims to balance regulation with enabling scientific research and makes provisions for penalties related to the illegal handling and distribution of these substances.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled the "Halt All Lethal Trafficking of Fentanyl Act" or the "HALT Fentanyl Act," proposes significant amendments to the Controlled Substances Act with a particular focus on fentanyl-related substances. The primary aim is to address the legal classification and regulation of chemicals related to fentanyl, potentially widening the scope of control and imposing penalties to curb trafficking and misuse. Additionally, it streamlines the registration process for researchers working with Schedule I controlled substances and introduces provisions for continuously evolving substances by allowing for ongoing research under certain conditions. The bill also mandates the development of interim and final rules to enforce these new measures.
Summary of Significant Issues
A key issue highlighted by the bill is the expansive definition of what constitutes a "fentanyl-related substance." This wide-ranging classification could lead to enforcement challenges, as distinguishing between controlled and non-controlled substances may become complex. There is also concern over the broad authority granted to the Attorney General, particularly regarding the power to publish lists of substances in the Federal Register, which some fear may lack sufficient transparency or oversight.
Further, the procedural changes related to research registration may inadvertently favor certain government-backed or funded research initiatives, potentially leading to issues of perceived favoritism. Another concern is the potential for indefinite research on newly scheduled substances, as the bill lacks explicit cutoff timelines or stringent oversight measures to prevent continuous research without clear endpoints.
The technical correction section also presents an issue of complexity. It amends previous laws in a manner that could be inaccessible to those without legal expertise, and there might be queries regarding the motivations behind these amendments.
Lastly, the language used in defining penalties for offenses related to fentanyl-related substances is highly technical, possibly making it challenging for the general public to interpret the scope of punishable actions accurately.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill seeks to enhance regulatory measures surrounding fentanyl, a substance with significant public health implications due to its potent and potentially lethal nature. By tightening controls and broadening definitions, the bill aims to reduce the illegal trafficking and misuse of fentanyl-related substances. This could, in turn, potentially lead to a decrease in fentanyl-related overdoses and deaths, positively impacting public safety and health.
However, the complexity of the bill and its reliance on intricate chemical terminology could pose challenges for public understanding and engagement. There may be a need for effective communication strategies to ensure that the broader community understands the implications and intentions of the legislative changes.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For law enforcement and regulatory bodies, the bill may introduce increased responsibilities and challenges in enforcement, given the broad scope of what constitutes fentanyl-related substances. The scientific and research community might find the streamlined processes beneficial, enabling more expedited research into Schedule I substances. However, some researchers could face obstacles due to unclear guidelines around quantities and the need for transparency in approval processes.
Healthcare providers, particularly those involved in pain management and addiction treatment, may need to adapt to the changes in controlled substances guidelines, possibly affecting prescribing practices. On the other hand, families and communities severely impacted by fentanyl abuse may see potential benefits from the enhanced measures aimed at curtailing the availability and proliferation of these substances.
The bill's passage would necessitate clear guidance and ongoing dialogue among affected stakeholders to ensure the legislation's objectives are achieved without unintended adverse effects.
Issues
The definition of 'fentanyl-related substance' in Section 2 is expansive and includes a wide range of chemical modifications. This might lead to ambiguity in its application and difficulty in enforcement due to the complex chemical descriptions and wide range of potential substances covered.
Section 3 outlines various registration requirements with potential issues in legal ambiguities and accountability, especially concerning verification of the amounts of substances and expedited procedures, which might implicitly favor certain research entities, potentially leading to favoritism.
The authority given to the Attorney General in Section 2 to publish lists in the Federal Register might lead to changes perceived as lacking transparency or insufficient oversight.
Section 4, which involves numerous amendments to previous laws, could make understanding difficult for individuals without legal expertise, potentially leading to questions about motivations and impacts of these changes.
The complex legal and chemical language used in Section 6 regarding penalties may be difficult for the general public to understand, leading to potential misinterpretation and ambiguity about punishable actions.
Section 3 allows for continuation of research on newly scheduled substances without clear cutoff timelines, potentially permitting indefinite research without adequate oversight.
The rulemaking process in Section 5 allows the Attorney General to issue interim final rules, which could become immediately effective without demonstrating good cause, thus raising concerns about transparency and due process.
The bill's heavy reliance on chemical nomenclature in Section 2 might not be easily understood by individuals who are not experts in chemistry or pharmacology, leading to challenges in public understanding and legal interpretation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The introductory section of this Act states that it can be referred to as the “Halt All Lethal Trafficking of Fentanyl Act” or simply the “HALT Fentanyl Act”.
2. Class scheduling of fentanyl-related substances Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section adds rules to the Controlled Substances Act to classify substances related to fentanyl. It defines what counts as a "fentanyl-related substance" based on its chemical structure, and it explains exceptions where certain substances, even if they fit the definition, will not be considered under this schedule if the Attorney General has taken other actions to control them or if they are already listed in another schedule.
3. Registration requirements related to research Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines changes to the Controlled Substances Act, making it easier for practitioners to obtain approval for research with Schedule I controlled substances, such as by allowing notifications to the Attorney General instead of separate registrations in certain cases. It also includes provisions for electronic submissions, transparency of special procedures, and rules for continuing research if a substance is newly added to Schedule I, while explicitly excluding the authority to grow marijuana.
4. Technical correction on controlled substances dispensing Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section makes technical corrections to previously issued laws by changing references from "303(g)" to "303(h)" in various parts of Public Law 117–328, adjusting the specific subsections cited for controlled substances dispensing to align correctly with the Controlled Substances Act.
5. Rulemaking Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Attorney General is required to issue rules to implement the Act within six months, with the option to issue them as interim final rules that take effect immediately. These interim rules allow for public comments and requests for hearings before a final rule is established.
6. Penalties Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill amends the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act to include fentanyl-related substances alongside existing substances, like analogues of N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide, under specific legal penalties and restrictions.
7. Applicability; other matters Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines when the amendments of the Act will begin to apply, starting from the date it becomes law, and clarifies that these changes do not affect how previous conduct is evaluated under certain Controlled Substances Act sections. Additionally, it mentions that Congress agrees with a legal interpretation from a 2018 court case regarding this Act.