Overview

Title

To provide for control of remote access of items under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 2683 is a new rule that says people from other countries have to follow special rules if they want to use certain American things over the internet, just like they would if they wanted to take them to another country. This helps keep important U.S. stuff safe.

Summary AI

H. R. 2683, titled the "Remote Access Security Act," aims to regulate the ability of foreign persons to remotely access items under the jurisdiction of the United States, with specific reference to the Export Control Reform Act of 2018. It modifies various sections of the Act to include provisions controlling remote access to items via networks such as the internet or cloud computing. This bill would ensure that remote access, similar to physical exports or in-country transfers, is subject to the same regulatory oversight and control measures to protect sensitive U.S. items and technologies.

Published

2025-04-07
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-04-07
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2683ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,655
Pages:
8
Sentences:
16

Language

Nouns: 393
Verbs: 105
Adjectives: 36
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 70
Entities: 71

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.28
Average Sentence Length:
103.44
Token Entropy:
4.19
Readability (ARI):
48.29

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled H. R. 2683, also known as the "Remote Access Security Act," seeks to amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018. This bill focuses on controlling the remote access of items under the jurisdiction of the United States. Remote access refers to situations where a foreign entity can access U.S. items through a network connection, including the internet or a cloud computing service, from a different location than where the item is physically located. The bill aims to imbue these remote connections with the same regulatory scrutiny as physical exports or transfers of items.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the key issues with the bill is the broad definition of "remote access." The lack of precision in its definition might lead to varying interpretations. This could potentially expand the scope of control beyond the bill's intention, impacting national security and global business operations.

Moreover, the extensive amendments made throughout the bill to incorporate "remote access" into various sections risk redundancies and increased complexity. These changes could make compliance more challenging for businesses, raising concerns about administrative burdens and costs.

Another issue is the need for a clear distinction between "remote access" and other forms of access. This ambiguity could result in inconsistent application of regulations, leading to confusion amongst stakeholders.

Impact on the Public Broadly

The broader public may not directly feel the effects of this bill; however, the indirect consequences could be significant. By adding complexity to export control regulations, the bill might inadvertently delay technological collaborations or projects involving international partners. This could potentially increase costs for industries reliant on remote connections or internet services, which might trickle down to consumers.

Enhancing security through more rigorous remote access controls is intended to protect national interests. Still, it could also limit innovation and slow down technological exchange across borders, affecting industries such as tech and manufacturing.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Businesses: Companies engaging in international collaboration will likely face increased compliance costs. The need to navigate more complex regulations and ensure that all remote accesses are properly controlled could require additional investments in technology and staff training.

Government Agencies: Agencies responsible for enforcing export controls might find the revisions burdensome, requiring adjustments in current practices and procedures to accommodate the expanded scope of regulation concerning remote access.

Innovators and Technologists: This stakeholder group could see both positive and negative impacts. While the bill aims to protect intellectual property and sensitive technologies, the increased regulatory burden may stifle innovation and slow down the process of international technological exchanges.

Privacy Advocates: There may be concerns about privacy and data sovereignty, especially if the broad definition of "remote access" is not clarified. Regulatory overreach could unintentionally infringe on personal and organizational privacy rights.

In summary, while the "Remote Access Security Act" aims to enhance security by including remote access within export controls, its broad definitions and complex amendments present practical challenges. Clarity and precision will be crucial in ensuring that the bill achieves its security objectives without imposing undue burdens on businesses and other stakeholders.

Issues

  • The broad definition of 'remote access' in Section 2, specifically in Section 1742 amended by the bill, might lead to significant interpretation issues and potentially unchecked control over foreign access, impacting both national security and business operations globally.

  • The repeated addition of 'remote access' throughout Section 2, including amendments to sections 1752, 1753, 1754, and 1756, creates redundancy and may increase legal complexity, making compliance difficult for businesses.

  • The lack of clear delineation between 'remote access' and other forms of access in Section 2, specifically as modified in sections 1753 and 1754, could result in ambiguity, leading to inconsistent application of regulations.

  • The extensive amendments in Section 2 may require comprehensive training and guidance for stakeholders, imposing significant administrative burdens and possibly increased costs on businesses to ensure compliance.

  • The potential for regulatory overreach due to loosely defined 'remote access' terms in Section 2 could lead to unintended consequences or ethical concerns regarding privacy and data sovereignty.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official name of the legislation is the “Remote Access Security Act.”

2. Control of remote access of items under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Export Control Reform Act of 2018 is being updated to include rules about "remote access," which means when someone from another country can connect to an item in the U.S. through networks like the internet. These changes ensure that remote access is treated with the same care and responsibility as the physical export or transfer of items.