Overview
Title
To provide for notification to, and review by, Congress with respect to the imposition of duties.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 2665, called the "Trade Review Act of 2025," says that if the President makes a decision to add or raise a tax on stuff coming from other countries, Congress has to be told about it quickly and has 60 days to agree; if they don't, the new tax goes away. This doesn't include certain special taxes for things like unfair trade practices.
Summary AI
H.R. 2665, known as the “Trade Review Act of 2025,” proposes that Congress must be notified within 48 hours whenever the President imposes or increases a duty on an imported article. The bill requires the President to explain the duty's rationale and assess its potential impact on U.S. businesses and consumers. Unless Congress enacts a joint resolution of approval, such duties are set to automatically expire after 60 days. However, the act does not apply to antidumping and countervailing duties, which are governed under a different law.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Trade Review Act of 2025," addresses congressional oversight of duties imposed on imported goods. This bill stipulates that whenever the President imposes or increases a duty on imported articles, Congress must be notified within 48 hours. The bill provides Congress with the opportunity to review these duties within a 60-day period. If Congress does not enact a joint resolution of approval, the duties will automatically expire at the end of this period. Conversely, Congress can also pass a joint resolution to disapprove of the duties, which would render them ineffective. Notably, the bill excludes antidumping and countervailing duties from this review process.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several significant issues emerge from the text of the bill. First, the notification requirement does not clearly specify the format or method for informing Congress, creating potential for inconsistent handling of duty notifications. Second, the bill does not address what happens if Congress does not act within the 60-day window, potentially leading to confusion and uncertainty about the status of duties. Ambiguities also arise concerning the assessment of the "potential impact" of duties, which lacks clear definitions or standard metrics for evaluation. The exclusion of antidumping and countervailing duties could raise questions about the equitable application of the bill’s oversight provisions.
Additionally, the references to legal sections without explanation could complicate the procedural understanding necessary for implementation. The bill also does not provide mechanisms for resolving disputes over the rationale or impact evaluations, potentially affecting fairness in the duty imposition process.
Impact on the General Public
For the general public, this bill could bring both positive and negative outcomes. By involving Congress in the review process, the public is afforded an additional layer of review, which could protect against arbitrary or economically harmful duty increases. On the other hand, the lack of clarification in key areas could lead to inefficiencies and delays, potentially affecting pricing and availability of goods.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Certain stakeholders are likely to experience specific impacts from this proposed legislation. U.S. businesses that rely on imported goods could face uncertainty during the 60-day review period, as fluctuating duties might impact cost structures. Consumers might initially benefit from the additional oversight, but they could also suffer from higher prices or disruptions in supply chains if the process leads to increased costs or delays.
For lawmakers, the bill presents a tool to exert more control over trade policies, but they must navigate complex procedural requirements, which could limit their effectiveness. By excluding antidumping and countervailing duties, the bill leaves a gap in oversight for certain trade actions, potentially affecting domestic industries that depend on such protection.
Overall, the "Trade Review Act of 2025" aims to balance the swift imposition of trade duties with a structured review by Congress. However, ambiguities and potential procedural challenges may temper its effectiveness, necessitating careful consideration and possible amendments to address these concerns.
Issues
The lack of clarity in the notification requirement in Section 2(a) and Section 155(a) regarding the format and method of submission to Congress could lead to inconsistencies and confusion about how notifications should be handled, potentially impacting timely decision-making by Congress.
The absence of specific procedures for Congress to follow if a joint resolution is not approved or disapproved within the 60-day period in Section 2(b) and Section 155(b) raises uncertainties about the validity or continuation of imposed duties, which could have significant financial implications for businesses and consumers.
The term 'potential impact' in Section 2(a)(2) and Section 155(a)(2) is vague and lacks clear definitions or guidelines for assessment, potentially resulting in inconsistent evaluations of the economic impacts on U.S. businesses and consumers.
The exclusion of antidumping and countervailing duties in Section 2(d) and Section 155(d) without an explanation could lead to questions regarding the transparency and fairness of applying reviews to different types of duties, raising concerns about the equitable treatment of trade measures.
The references to other legal sections and expedited procedures in Section 2(e)(3) and Section 155(e)(3) without summarization may pose challenges to understanding and implementation, especially without legal expertise, potentially hindering effective legislative scrutiny.
Potential confusion in the language of joint resolution templates in Section 2(e)(1) and Section 155(e)(1) could arise if information is insufficient or incorrectly filled out, impacting the legislative process and outcomes.
The lack of explicit mechanisms in the bill for resolving disputes over the reasoning or impact assessment of duties, particularly in Section 2 and Section 155, could lead to fairness and objectivity concerns in the duty imposition process.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act states that it can be officially referred to as the "Trade Review Act of 2025."
2. Review by Congress of imposition of duties Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has outlined a procedure for reviewing new duties on imported goods in the United States. The President must notify Congress within 48 hours of imposing or increasing a duty, which lasts up to 60 days unless Congress approves it; Congress can also disapprove duties, while exclusions apply for antidumping and countervailing duties.
155. Review of imposition of duties Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the process for reviewing duties imposed on imported goods to the United States. It requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of imposing or increasing duties, specifies that duties automatically expire after 60 days unless Congress approves them, and excludes antidumping and countervailing duties. Congress can also disapprove such duties through a joint resolution, and expedited procedures apply to both approval and disapproval resolutions.