Overview
Title
To ensure the security and integrity of United States critical infrastructure by establishing an interagency task force and requiring a comprehensive report on the targeting of United States critical infrastructure by People’s Republic of China state-sponsored cyber actors, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 2659 is about making sure important places, like airports and train stations, are safe from cyber bad guys by setting up a special group to keep an eye on them and make plans to stop the bad guys. This group will tell everyone what's happening and will write secret reports about how to keep things safe.
Summary AI
H. R. 2659 aims to protect the United States' critical infrastructure by setting up an interagency task force to address cybersecurity threats from Chinese state-sponsored actors, specifically Volt Typhoon. The bill requires the task force to produce a comprehensive report assessing risks and potential damages to sectors like rail, aviation, and ports, and recommends strategies to counter these threats. It includes provisions for ongoing annual reports to provide updates on findings and recommendations. Additionally, the bill outlines information-sharing protocols and exempts the task force from certain federal advisory and paperwork reduction laws.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The bill, known formally as the "Strengthening Cyber Resilience Against State-Sponsored Threats Act," was introduced in the House of Representatives on April 7, 2025. It aims to safeguard U.S. critical infrastructure by forming an interagency task force to assess threats from state-sponsored cyber activities by the People's Republic of China (PRC), specifically those believed to be carried out by a group referred to as Volt Typhoon. Alongside forming this task force, the bill mandates comprehensive reporting on these cybersecurity threats to be presented to Congress.
Significant Issues
A few key issues have been identified in the proposed mandate for this task force.
Potential Redundancy and Coordination Challenges: The task force could overlap with existing groups addressing similar cybersecurity issues, leading to inefficient use of resources and potentially duplicative efforts. Effective coordination is necessary to avoid such redundancies, but the bill leaves some ambiguity regarding how interagency collaboration will be structured.
Transparency and Oversight Concerns: A notable percentage of the task force's findings and recommendations would be conveyed in classified reports. This restriction limits public and non-governmental oversight, which could be critical in devising a comprehensive response to cybersecurity threats.
Delayed Actionable Outcomes: The timeline for the task force to submit its initial report is 540 days post-establishment, which is considered lengthy. This delay could impede timely responses to pressing cybersecurity threats.
Reduced Transparency Due to Exemptions: The bill exempts the task force from the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Paperwork Reduction Act, potentially reducing its transparency and accountability.
Classified Assessments: The emphasis on classified assessments of PRC's potential to disrupt U.S. Armed Forces or critical infrastructure operations raises concerns over the availability of crucial information to stakeholders needing to respond effectively to threats.
Interagency Coordination Clarity: The bill lacks clarity in defining the responsibilities for ensuring effective interagency coordination, which could lead to jurisdictional overlaps or gaps.
Stakeholder Communication: The mandate for ongoing communication and updates with critical infrastructure owners is insufficient, which could impact continuous threat mitigation efforts.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
The bill's implementation could have significant implications for both the general public and specific stakeholders.
General Public Impact: For the general populace, the overall goal of the bill is to strengthen national security by countering cybersecurity threats. However, the largely classified nature of findings might result in limited public knowledge and understanding of the risks, potentially affecting public trust in governmental cybersecurity measures.
Impact on Government Agencies: Agencies involved, particularly the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), will need to navigate possible jurisdictional challenges and work toward effective interagency collaboration to achieve the bill's objectives.
Stakeholders in Critical Infrastructure: For those directly involved in managing critical infrastructure, the lack of mandated continuous communication might hinder their ability to respond swiftly and adequately to cybersecurity threats. Effective threat mitigation would require more regular updates and potentially increased transparency in how threats are being managed.
National Security: By focusing on threats from state-sponsored cyber actors, the bill could positively contribute to national security. However, ensuring efficient use of resources and clarity in role delineation among stakeholders is crucial to realizing this potential benefit.
Overall, while the bill strives to address a pressing threat to national security, the issues highlighted suggest a need for improvements in coordination, transparency, and stakeholder engagement to effectively counteract cybersecurity threats and protect U.S. critical infrastructure.
Issues
The creation of a new interagency task force to address cybersecurity threats from the People's Republic of China (PRC) could duplicate efforts of existing groups, leading to inefficient resource use if not properly coordinated. This is particularly important given the potential overlap with current task forces and working groups (Section 2(e)).
The act mandates that a substantial percentage of the findings and recommendations derived from the task force are to be delivered in classified reports. This limits public and non-governmental oversight, which might be critical given the sensitive nature of this cybersecurity threat (Section 2(f)(5)).
There is a significant delay in actionable outcomes due to the long timeline for the task force to submit its initial report, which is set at 540 days post-establishment. This could be seen as a protracted timeline for addressing pressing cybersecurity threats (Section 2(f)(1)).
By exempting the task force from the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Paperwork Reduction Act, the bill reduces transparency and accountability of the task force's operations, which could raise concerns about government oversight and public awareness (Sections 2(i) and 2(j)).
The bill emphasizes classified assessments, including the capacity of the PRC to disrupt U.S. Armed Forces operations and critical infrastructure. While these assessments provide vital national security insights, the predominantly classified nature raises concerns about the availability of critical information to stakeholders who need to respond effectively (Section 2(f)(3)(C-E)).
The responsibilities for ensuring interagency coordination lack clarity and might result in jurisdictional overlaps or gaps if the roles are not clearly defined, especially within such a complex operational structure (Section 2(a)).
The task force's initiative requires extensive collaboration with a range of stakeholders but does not clearly mandate ongoing communication and updates with critical infrastructure owners beyond an initial awareness plan, which may be insufficient for continuous threat mitigation (Section 2(f)(3)(H)).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section briefly provides the title of the legislation, which is called the “Strengthening Cyber Resilience Against State-Sponsored Threats Act.”
2. Interagency task force and report on the targeting of United States critical infrastructure by People’s Republic of China state-sponsored cyber actors Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the creation of an interagency task force, led by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the FBI, to address cybersecurity threats from Chinese state-sponsored hackers known as Volt Typhoon. It requires reports on potential risks, necessary resources, and strategies to counter cyber threats, with findings presented to Congress and some published online.