Overview

Title

To prohibit regulations implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act from applying to abortion or the coverage of abortion or abortion-related services.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 2644 is a plan made by some grown-ups in the government to make sure that when they talk about rules for helping moms-to-be at work, they don't talk about anything to do with stopping babies from being born.

Summary AI

H.R. 2644, titled the "Love Them Both Act of 2025," aims to ensure that the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act does not apply to abortion or the coverage of abortion-related services. The bill specifically prohibits the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights from creating, implementing, or enforcing any rules related to abortion under this Act. The bill was introduced by Mrs. Miller of Illinois along with Mr. LaMalfa and Mr. Babin and has been referred to relevant committees for consideration.

Published

2025-04-03
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-04-03
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2644ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
266
Pages:
2
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 95
Verbs: 21
Adjectives: 5
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 8
Entities: 25

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.58
Average Sentence Length:
38.00
Token Entropy:
4.46
Readability (ARI):
22.68

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled "Love Them Both Act of 2025" is introduced in the House of Representatives. This legislation aims to restrict the scope of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act by prohibiting the implementation of regulations that apply to abortion and abortion-related services. Specifically, it prohibits the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Board of Directors of the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights from finalizing or enforcing any abortion-related regulations under this Act.

Significant Issues

A primary issue identified with the bill is the potential for significant legal and political disputes. The bill's prohibition on regulations concerning abortion or abortion-related services is broad and might lead to confusion about what specific practices are affected. This ambiguity could spark debates and challenges in courts as stakeholders seek clarity on its implications.

Another notable concern is the apparent bias implicit in focusing on abortion-related restrictions. This specificity may raise questions about fairness and equity in the regulatory environment, particularly for women's rights advocates and organizations supporting reproductive health services.

Additionally, the reliance on cross-references to existing statutes, like section 105 of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act and 42 U.S.C. 2000gg-3, complicates the bill for those without a legal background. The need to understand these references might cause difficulties in interpretation and potentially in the implementation of related legal norms.

Potential Broad Impact

For the general public, the bill might introduce uncertainty regarding the availability and legality of abortion-related services when receiving workplace accommodations under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. This uncertainty could lead to delays or denials in accommodations for pregnant workers seeking or obtaining abortions, affecting their health and wellbeing.

There might also be broader societal implications given that abortion remains a contentious issue in the United States. Legal challenges could arise from this bill, potentially resulting in significant discussions and rulings in higher courts.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For healthcare providers and organizations advocating for reproductive rights, this bill could present significant hurdles. It might limit their ability to support pregnant workers who require abortion-related services as part of their healthcare rights.

On the other hand, groups and individuals who oppose abortion might view this bill positively as it aligns with their advocacy for limiting abortion access and services under federal law.

Employers might face challenges in navigating the complexities of the law when it comes to accommodating pregnant workers while ensuring compliance with both existing workers' protections and this new legal provision, if enacted. Legal advisors will likely need to be consulted more frequently, resulting in increased administrative burdens.

Overall, the "Love Them Both Act of 2025" is poised to foster debate across multiple sectors, implicating both individual rights and broader social policy considerations.

Issues

  • The prohibition on regulations related to abortion or abortion-related services in Section 2 may lead to significant legal and political disputes. The ambiguity around what specific practices or coverage are affected could cause confusion, making it an important issue for public and legal scrutiny.

  • The focus in Section 2 on preventing regulations related to abortion or abortion-related services may suggest an implicit bias, raising concerns about fairness or equity in regulatory implementation. This could be a significant ethical and political issue.

  • The reference to section 105 of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act in Section 2, without further context, requires additional investigation to fully understand the scope and implications. This complicates the auditing process and may create difficulty in legal and regulatory interpretation.

  • Cross-reference to other legal texts like 42 U.S.C. 2000gg–3 in Section 2 necessitates a thorough understanding by the reader, which may lead to potential confusion or misinterpretation.

  • Section 1 is a short title provision with clear language establishing the Act's name. While it doesn't present ambiguity, it offers no substantive information, making it difficult to identify potential issues related to wasteful spending or favoritism.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill specifies that the official name for this legislation is the "Love Them Both Act of 2025."

2. Regulatory implementation of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Board of Directors of the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights are prohibited from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing any regulation under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act that deals with abortion or covers abortion-related services.