Overview

Title

To require public elementary and middle schools that receive funds under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to obtain parental consent before changing a minor’s gender markers, pronouns, or preferred name on any school form or sex-based accommodations, including locker rooms or bathrooms.

ELI5 AI

Parents need to say "yes" before a school can change a student's name, how they're referred to, or where they go to the bathroom. If the school doesn't ask the parents first, they might not get some money from the government.

Summary AI

H. R. 2616 aims to set a rule that public elementary and middle schools which receive federal funding under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 must get permission from a student's parents before making changes to the student's gender markers, pronouns, or preferred name on any school documents. Additionally, schools will need parental consent to modify sex-based accommodations, such as access to locker rooms or bathrooms. The bill emphasizes safeguarding parental rights over school-related decisions concerning their children's gender identity.

Published

2025-04-03
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-04-03
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2616ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
403
Pages:
2
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 139
Verbs: 35
Adjectives: 18
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 17
Entities: 26

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.20
Average Sentence Length:
40.30
Token Entropy:
4.64
Readability (ARI):
21.81

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed bill, known as the "Parental Rights Over The Education and Care of Their Kids Act" or the "PROTECT Kids Act," seeks to modify the protocols surrounding how public elementary and middle schools handle changes to a student's gender identity-related information. Specifically, it mandates that these schools, if they receive federal funding under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, must secure parental consent before altering a student's gender markers, pronouns, or preferred name on any school forms. Additionally, the bill calls for parental consent before making changes to sex-based accommodations, which include locker rooms and bathrooms.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues are tied to this bill, beginning with the requirement of obtaining parental consent. This element raises concerns about potential negative impacts on students who might not have supportive parents. For transgender or non-binary students, the bill could complicate their ability to navigate schooling environments safely and comfortably.

Another issue is the lack of clear definitions within the bill—specifically, what constitutes "parental consent" and "sex-based accommodations." This ambiguity might lead to inconsistent application and understanding across different educational institutions. Additionally, the measure ties federal funding to compliance with these requirements, which significantly raises the stakes for schools, possibly leading to compliance challenges.

Broad Impact on the Public

The legislation could have wide-ranging effects on public schools and the students they serve. On a broad scale, tying federal education funding to compliance might affect educational resource allocation and could influence how schools prioritize policy implementation. This link between funding and compliance could force schools to adopt rigorous measures to ensure adherence, possibly diverting focus from other important educational initiatives.

Moreover, the bill's requirements might lead to increased administrative workloads for school personnel as they navigate the complexities of obtaining and verifying parental consent. This could result in a need for additional training or resources to effectively manage these new responsibilities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For parents and guardians, the bill offers more direct control over how their children's gender identity is managed in school, aligning with those who advocate for stronger parental rights in educational settings. However, for students, particularly those in the LGBTQ+ community, the bill could present substantial obstacles. Students without supportive environments at home may face difficulties expressing their true identity, which could impact their mental health and overall well-being.

Schools in more diverse or liberal communities could experience heightened tension between inclusive policies and the new federal requirements. These settings may find this legislation in conflict with existing values around inclusion and respect for student identity, which might lead to legal challenges or other forms of advocacy against the bill.

Overall, while the bill seeks to reinforce parental rights, it presents significant potential consequences for students' privacy, safety, and autonomy, with ripple effects on the educational environment and resource allocation within public schools.

Issues

  • The requirement to obtain parental consent for changes to gender markers, pronouns, or preferred names could potentially involve complex situations, particularly for students who do not have supportive parents. This requirement may not take into account the rights and needs of transgender or non-binary students whose safety and well-being could be compromised. (Section 2)

  • The measure ties funding to compliance with the requirement, which amplifies its impact but also could create compliance challenges for schools, particularly those with diverse student populations. (Section 2)

  • It is unclear how 'parental consent' is defined and what form of consent is considered valid. This could lead to varying interpretations among different public schools. (Section 2)

  • The term 'sex-based accommodations' is mentioned, but there is no clear definition provided in the text. Clarification on what changes can be made and in what contexts these accommodations are used is needed to avoid ambiguity. (Section 2)

  • The section lacks any specific detail about the provisions of the act, making it unclear what policies or actions are being proposed, leading to potential ambiguity regarding its purpose. (Section 1)

  • The short title 'PROTECT Kids Act' does not indicate the specific content or focus of the legislation, which might lead to ambiguity regarding its purpose. (Section 1)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the official name of the act is the “Parental Rights Over The Education and Care of Their Kids Act” and it can also be referred to as the “PROTECT Kids Act.”

2. Requirement related to gender markers, pronouns, and preferred names on school forms Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Public schools receiving federal funds under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act must get approval from a student's parents before changing the student's gender markers, pronouns, preferred name, or sex-based accommodations like locker rooms or bathrooms. This requirement applies specifically to minors in elementary or middle school.