Overview

Title

To prohibit the sale of food that is, or contains, unsafe poppy seeds.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 2615 wants to make sure that food sold in stores doesn't have bad poppy seeds that can make people sick, and it gives a government doctor two years to decide how much of the bad stuff is okay before it's dangerous.

Summary AI

H. R. 2615, also known as the "Stephen Hacala Poppy Seed Safety Act," aims to prohibit the sale of food containing unsafe levels of poppy seeds. The bill is named after Stephen Hacala, who died from morphine intoxication due to contaminated poppy seeds. It mandates the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish and finalize rules for acceptable contamination levels by morphine, codeine, and other compounds within two years. Additionally, the bill clarifies that poppy seeds contaminated with these substances are not exempt from regulation under the Controlled Substances Act.

Published

2025-04-02
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-04-02
Package ID: BILLS-119hr2615ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
696
Pages:
4
Sentences:
25

Language

Nouns: 219
Verbs: 50
Adjectives: 40
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 31
Entities: 53

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.19
Average Sentence Length:
27.84
Token Entropy:
4.98
Readability (ARI):
15.80

AnalysisAI

General Summary

H.R. 2615, known as the "Stephen Hacala Poppy Seed Safety Act," was introduced in Congress to address the issue of morphine contamination in poppy seeds, which can have severe health implications. The bill aims to prevent the sale of food products containing unsafe levels of poppy seeds by establishing specific contamination limits for morphine, codeine, and other harmful compounds. These measures are intended to prevent incidents of overdose and to mitigate the negative outcomes from consuming contaminated poppy seeds. The bill tasks the Secretary of Health and Human Services with setting these limits and providing a framework for regulation.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the main issues with the bill is the lack of specificity regarding the exact contamination levels for morphine, codeine, and other compounds that would render poppy seeds unsafe. Without these details, there is potential for ambiguity or delay in the enforcement of the Act. Additionally, there is no clear criterion laid out for how the Secretary of Health and Human Services would designate other compounds as contaminants, which could lead to subjective or inconsistent enforcement.

Furthermore, the bill does not provide an estimate of the financial impact on the food industry or regulatory bodies, leading to concerns about potential wasteful spending. The lack of defined enforcement mechanisms raises questions about the effectiveness of the proposed regulations. The broad language allowing for the designation of contaminants could result in biased decisions, which calls for more explicit guidelines. The term "adulterated" is not clearly explained, causing potential confusion for those unfamiliar with legal jargon.

Another concern is the complexity of the bill's language, which might make it difficult for the general public to understand its implications, particularly concerning the regulation and control of contaminated poppy seeds.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill aims to protect public health by preventing the sale of poppy seeds contaminated with dangerous levels of morphine and other compounds. This could reduce the number of accidental overdoses and limit incidents where individuals face legal or social issues related to contaminated poppy consumption, such as unwarranted scrutiny by child welfare services.

However, due to the lack of specified contamination levels and a clearly defined oversight process, there might be delays in the actual implementation of safety measures. To be effective, the public would need clarity on what constitutes safe versus unsafe levels of contamination in poppy seeds.

Impact on Stakeholders

For consumers, particularly those regularly consuming products containing poppy seeds, the bill offers significant protection against potential health risks. Mothers and servicemembers, as noted in the bill, may face less risk of testing positive for opiates due to contaminated seeds.

Food manufacturers and distributors could face challenges due to the lack of clarity on contamination thresholds and enforcement mechanisms. This could result in financial uncertainty until the specific regulations are established. On the regulatory side, agencies might encounter difficulties designing and implementing effective oversight strategies without a detailed framework provided by the legislative text.

Overall, while the bill has the potential to significantly enhance public safety, its success will depend on how effectively it addresses these critical concerns through clear and actionable guidelines.

Issues

  • The bill does not specify the exact contamination levels of morphine, codeine, and other alkaloid compounds for poppy seeds, which could create ambiguity and delay the enforcement of the Act (Section 3).

  • There is a lack of specific criteria or process for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to designate other compounds as contaminants, which may lead to subjective or inconsistent enforcement (Section 3).

  • The bill does not provide an estimation of the cost or financial impact on the food industry or regulatory bodies for implementing these changes, raising concerns about potential wasteful spending and economic impact (Section 3).

  • The enforcement mechanisms for ensuring compliance with the proposed contamination levels are not clearly defined, leading to concerns about the effectiveness of regulation (Section 2).

  • The broad language used to allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to designate compounds as contaminants could lead to subjective and potentially biased decisions, requiring clearer guidelines (Section 4).

  • The term 'adulterated' as used under section 402 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is not explained in detail, which may cause confusion for those unfamiliar with the legal terminology (Section 3).

  • The language in the bill may be overly complex, potentially making it difficult for the public to understand the implications, especially regarding how contaminated poppy seeds will be controlled and enforced (Section 4).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The short title of this Act is the “Stephen Hacala Poppy Seed Safety Act.”

2. Findings; purpose Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress has found that morphine contamination in poppy seeds has caused numerous overdoses and other issues, leading to unnecessary scrutiny for some individuals. The purpose of the Act is to set strict contamination limits to prevent such problems and prohibit adulterated poppy seeds in interstate trade.

3. Unsafe poppy seeds as adulterants in food Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to propose and finalize a rule within two years about how much morphine, codeine, and other compounds can be present in poppy seeds before they are considered unsafe or adulterated, as per the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

4. Poppy seeds as a controlled substance Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Poppy seeds that are contaminated with compounds like morphine or codeine are not excluded from being regulated as controlled substances under the Controlled Substances Act.